The best answer is B) The only political party allowed to exist is the Communist Party of China. This reflects the oligarchic nature of China's government where power is concentrated in the hands of a small elite group within the Chinese Communist Party.
An oligarchy is a form of government where power resides in the hands of a small group of individuals.In China, the political system is dominated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which controls all aspects of governance and decision-making.The Politburo of the CCP, comprising about twenty individuals, along with its Standing Committee, usually consisting of 7 to 12 high-ranking officials, holds immense power.The CCP is the only political party that is constitutionally protected and guaranteed power, leaving no room for opposition or other political parties.This concentration of power among a small elite group within the CCP highlights the oligarchic nature of China's government.Complete Question:
which answer BEST supports the statement, "China's government can be considered an oligarchy"?
A) The government has traditionally existed as a command economy.
B) The only political party allowed to exist is the Communist Party of China.
C) The right to vote is given to all citizens who are at least 18 years of age.
D) The government is ruled completely by one person who has unchecked authority.
Which factor would typically be addressed in the developmental/family history component of the initial interview?
How does positive feedback affect the way participants remember the crime video?
Final answer:
Positive feedback among participants can significantly corrupt their memories of crime video details, especially when they discuss these details with co-witnesses, thereby impacting the accuracy and reliability of their memories.
Explanation:
Positive feedback in the context of remembering a crime video, as suggested by the research provided, can significantly influence the accuracy of participants' memories. When participants discuss details of a crime with co-witnesses, their common memories for the event can be reinforced, however, this communication can also lead to the corruption of their independent memories. This phenomenon is particularly concerning in legal settings where accurate eyewitness testimony is crucial. Research has shown that subjects' accuracy for details not previously discussed with a co-witness was relatively high at 79%.
However, this accuracy dropped markedly to 34% for items that were discussed among co-witnesses, indicating that discussions allowed co-witnesses to corrupt each other's memories. This showcases the powerful impact of social interaction and misinformation on memory retention and accuracy, and highlights the importance of preventing or limiting discussion among witnesses immediately following a crime to preserve the integrity of their individual memories.
What is bias? falsified data, resulting from pre-conceived ideas about the results racial prejudice on the part of the experimenters systematic error in the way a sample represents a population a situation in which two errors cancel one another errors resulting from getting two strange of a sample?
Answer:
Systematic error in the way a sample represents a population
Explanation:
Just took it
Eric just started saying two-word sentences such as “dada home” and “doggie go.” about how old is eric likely to be? 10 months 12 months 16 months 21 months
Why did aspects of byzantine civilization continue to spread even as the byzantine empire declined?
Many of the delegates chosen to the Constitutional Convention were landowners, bankers, merchants, and ______________________.
A) lawyers
B) professors
C) soldiers
D) farmers
Answer:
A) lawyers
Explanation:
What amendments to the constitution are the most important for the administration of justice?
A researcher observes competitive behavior among children at a summer camp. she notes that "a child saying negative words to another child" is an example of verbally abusive competition. in this example, "a child saying negative words to another child" is:
In the given example, the child saying negative words towards another child is considered to be an operational definition for the behavior category. The operational definition for the behavior category is a way of pointing out or showing the behavior of a certain person of which is being observed and are being defined.
The fact that michelle's signature is required on all documents and her word is the last word on all decisions relating to her unit, suggests that
what are two adaptations that prey organisms have developed to protect themselves?
specialization allows countries to
When looking at faces, infants between age one and two months shift from?
_____ refers to the program's ability to allow trainees to respond to questions. sophistication of the multimedia interactivity auto pacing self pacing
what was Andrew Jackson's belief about Native Americans
They stood in the way of land acquisition by white men. :;;---}
The _________ lobes contain the functions underlying much of our thinking and reasoning abilities.
Serena's psychologist asked her to look carefully at several ambiguous images and say what she sees in the images. serena's psychologist is using what kind of personality test?
The kind of personality test used by Serena's psychologist is projective test .
What is a projective test?A projective test is a personality test used in psychology that asks subjects to respond to ambiguous stimuli, ostensibly to discover hidden emotions and internal conflicts that the subject then projects onto the exam.
Projective testing is mostly used to evaluate personality functioning. Each projective test has some sort of unstructured stimulus material, including smudges, images of individuals in social situations, or a blank sheet of paper.
In contrast to conventional testing techniques like questionnaires or formal interviews, projective tests give participants the freedom to share their opinions and ideas without worrying about criticism or social repercussions.
To learn more about projective test
https://brainly.com/question/10379868
#SPJ5
Compared with ordinary cocaine, crack produces a ________ intense high followed by a ________ intense crash.
To take an organized approach to developing your critical thinking, which group of chapters would you consult in order to learn about the strengths and weaknesses of the three most fundamental forms of human reasoning-comparative, ideological, and empirical?
Consult chapters that detail reasoning strategies, provide critical thinking questions, and introduce logic for a structured and comprehensive approach to understanding the strengths and weaknesses of comparative, ideological, and empirical forms of reasoning.
Explanation:To develop your critical thinking skills around the strengths and weaknesses of the three most fundamental forms of human reasoning-comparative, ideological, and empirical, there are a few chapters that you could consult in a college-level philosophy or critical thinking textbook.
Firstly, chapters detailing the six reasoning strategies-analogy, cause and effect, classification and division, comparison and contrast, problem and solution, and definition-will provide an overarching understanding of the structures of thought and logical reasoning. They also shed light on how personal and cultural views shape reasoning.
Secondly, look for chapters containing critical thinking questions that prompt reflection and critique of existing philosophical positions and foster the development of personal philosophical thoughts. The provision of further reading resources will allow for deeper understanding of topics.
Lastly, consult sections explaining conceptual analysis or introducing logic and its use in verifying and analyzing claims. This will make the connections between philosophy and critical thinking clear and practical, giving you concrete tools for effectively reasoning in academic and personal contexts. Exploring these chapters will improve your understanding of the science of reasoning.
Learn more about Critical thinking and human reasoning here:https://brainly.com/question/6396483
#SPJ11
while on patrol, jerry receives a call regarding a domestic disturbance—a fight between a husband and wife. by the time jerry arrives at the scene of the disturbance, things have calmed considerably, and he decides to merely warn the parties rather than take any further action. which type of discretionary factor is best represented in this circumstance
Officer Jerry's decision to warn the parties involved in a domestic disturbance, rather than making an arrest, exemplifies the use of police discretion informed by the specifics of the situation and backed by research showing varied effects of arrest.
In the scenario described, Jerry, a law enforcement officer, demonstrates officer discretion when he decides to give a warning following a domestic disturbance, rather than taking further action. Officer discretion is a discretionary factor that allows law enforcement officers to make decisions based on the specifics of a situation. This discretion is informed by several factors, including the circumstances of the incident, the attitude of the parties involved, and the officer's judgment on the potential benefits of arrest versus informal resolution. The provided research suggests that the impact of arrest on future violence is conditional, with factors like employment and marital status influencing whether arrest acts as a deterrent or not. Jerry's choice to warn rather than arrest could be based on his assessment that, under these calmed circumstances, informal resolution might suffice without the further consequences that an arrest could entail.
what determine the Cherokee law govern the land of the Cherokee Nation rather than the laws of Georgia 99 points
There were two cases that determined.
1) "The Cherokee Nation v. The State of Georgia", which stated that the Supreme Court cannot hear a suit brought by the Cherokee Nation, as it is not a foreign country.
2) "Worcester v. Georgia", which states that "states" have no criminal jurisdiction in Indian country.
hope this helps
Studies of refugees who fled to the united states found that these groups often had:
The studies of refugees who fled to the United States found that these groups often had the following disorders which are the PTSD and the somatization disorder. The PTSD or also known as the post traumatic stress disorder happens when a person is exposed to a stressful or terrifying scenario that led him or her to experience certain symptoms. The somatization disorder, in the other hand, is when a [person experience somatic symptoms.
Which molecule would you expect to be a free radical? which molecule would you expect to be a free radical? co co2 n2o no2?
NO2 (Nitrogen Dioxide) is expected to be a free radical, as it has an unpaired electron in its molecular structure, making it highly reactive.
Explanation:The term free radical is used to refer to a molecule that contains an unpaired electron in its outer shell, making it highly reactive. A molecule is stable when it has an even number of electrons such that they can completely fill in all of the orbitals, pairing up with one another. Among CO, CO2, N2O, and NO2, this odd electron relationship is seen in NO2 (Nitrogen Dioxide). In NO2, we have one nitrogen atom and two oxygen atoms, amounting to 17 electrons in total: 5 from nitrogen, and 6 from each oxygen atom. With these 17 electrons, one electron will be left unpaired, making NO2 a free radical.
Learn more about free radicals here:https://brainly.com/question/34681981
#SPJ6
Brent moved to a new city and got a new job. on his first day he was nervous to meet a bunch of strangers. his primary concern for these interactions, according to berger, would be to
According to Berger's theory of Social Interaction, Brent's primary concern would be Uncertainty Reduction. People communicate with others to reduce uncertainties, this could be the case for Brent when he first meets his new colleagues.
Explanation:According to Berger's theory of social interaction, Brent's primary concern when meeting a bunch of strangers in his new job would likely revolve around uncertainty reduction. According to Charles Berger, humans are uncomfortable with uncertainty in social situations, so they use communication as a tool to reduce this uncertainty. This could be reflected in Brent's nervousness and concern when meeting new colleagues because he knows little about them. Over time, as he communicates and interacts with his colleagues, his uncertainty and nervousness should decrease, improving his comfort in these social interactions.
Learn more about Berger's Theory of Social Interaction here:https://brainly.com/question/31793430
#SPJ12
_____ refers to the tendency for old patterns of problem solving to persist.
Why females, particularly older women, produce aneuploidy gametes more often than do males?
Which of the following is true of good human relations?
Cooke scholars are committed to making the world a better place. they are inventing solutions, advocating for others, and giving back to their communities. however, most started with small steps. what steps, big or small, have you taken to make your own impact on the world?
In this world, human kind is bounded with every ability to enjoy each and every resource they are given. People are destined to donate to the helpless people who are not able to have all this freedoms we can enjoy effortlessly in this world. The ethics and morale say that we have to aid and give our influence to the society where all people could not have the basic facilities of food, shelter and clothing. As we provide little share or giving a bit to needy people from our better lifestyle and would not make it any lesser.
Approximately what percentage of state and local expenditures do bond referenda account for? 25 percent. 10 percent. less than 1 percent. 50 percent.
Which is the best term to use when describing the energy of motion?
Answer:
Kinetic
Explanation:
Edg 21
Statements by someone with special knowledge on a given subject are known as
Answer: expert testimony.
Explanation:
Expert testimony refers to an opinion provided by a person who is deemed an expert because of specific education, skills, or experience in a specific subject. The expert is considered an authority in the subject, although he can still be called into question by other evidence or experts. Expert testimony is better used after entering a main point or subpoint of our argument, to better support and explain it.