Answer:
not qualified to legislate on some matters, but entitled to key rights
Explanation:
Hi! Your question is lacking its passage, so I went online to find it.
Complete question:
I like the power given the Legislature to levy taxes, and for that reason solely I approve of the greater house being chosen by the people directly. For though I think a house so chosen will be very illy [badly] qualified to legislate for the Union, for foreign nations, etc., yet this evil does not weigh against the good of preserving the fundamental principle that the people are not to be taxed but by representatives chosen by themselves.
Which of the following summarizes Jefferson's views of "the people" in this passage?
-entirely incapable of legislating for the Union
-not qualified to legislate on some matters, but entitled to key rights
-undeserving of being taxed by their government
-the best choice to create legislation for the Union on all matters
Answer:
The correct answer is: not qualified to legislate on some matters, but entitled to key rights .
Explanation:
In this passage, we can read and understand Jefferson's views of the people. Jefferson talks mainly of taxes and the importance of who are the ones that decide on that matter. Since taxing is something that the citizens must take part in, Jefferson believes that they are the ones that should directly choose their representatives of the Greater House. This, however, won't give people the power to decide on matters regarding the Union and foreign relationships. This power to decide over their key rights but not over other issues and topics is what Jefferson thinks it's right for the people.
What was NOT a warning in Washington’s farewell address?
A Do not give the people too much power B Do not take on too much debt C Do not form close ties with European countries D Do not form political parties
Answer:
A - do not give the people too much power.
1863: John D. Rockefeller partners with Maurice B. Clark and Samuel
Andrews to open his first oil refinery
1871: J. P. Morgan becomes a partner in the banking firm Drexel, Morgan &
Co.
1875: Andrew Camegie uses money from earlier investments to open his first
steel mill.
1882: Rockefeller forms the Standard Oil Trust, which controls most U.S. oil
production
1889: Morgan merges several electricity companies to found General Electric
1892: Striking workers at Carnegie's mill in Homestead, Pennsylvania, clash
with hired security forces.
1895: Morgan takes over Drexel and restructures it to become J. P. Morgan &
Co.
1899: Carnegie combines several steel mills that he has purchased into
Carnegie Steel
1901: Morgan buys out Carnegie for $480 million and forms U.S. Steel.
1914: The United Mine Workers strike at a Rockefeller-owned coal mine in
Ludlow, Colorado, ends in a massacre.
The information in the timeline most clearly supports the idea that:
O
A. free enterprise slowed investment in private industry.
O
B. workers and owners built jointly owned corporations.
O
C. promising entrepreneurs benefited from political favors.
O
D. big-business growth led to conflicts with workers.
Answer:
The right answer is:
D. big-business growth led to conflicts with workers.
Explanation:
Divergent interests of investors and workers are a historical fact. Workers have usually demanded better pay and working conditions. Capitalism has evolved since the 19th century in the USA and in the world, workers have more rights now, but labor-capital conflicts are always present, it´s inevitable. All the remaining options shown here are not logical, only D. is a statement that conforms to events and facts provided.
Why was there constitutional crisis during 1955 to 1956 ?
Answer: The Coloured vote constitutional crisis
Was the response of the South African apartheid regime to the adoption of the Freedom Charter at the People's Congress in Kliptown on June 26, 1955.
The 156 defendants were charged with high treason, a charge that led to the death sentence. The defendants were finally found to be "innocent," but some of them were later convicted at the Rivonia Trial.
What was one characteristic of South Africa's policy of apartheid?
A. Nonwhites were forced to live in separate areas from the white
minority
B. Europeans were able to freely immigrate to South Africa and claim
land.
O
C. All South African citizens were allowed to vote in general
elections
O
D. Whites had to pay reparations to nonwhites as punishment for
segregation.
Answer:
One characteristic of South Africa's policy of apartheid is 'Nonwhites were forced to live in separate areas from the white minority'.
Option: (A)
Explanation:
The notion of 'white supremacy' brought into practice by the white minority in South Africa gave birth to segregationist policies. These policies further strengthened to take the form of 'apartheid' which was the worst culmination of the segregationist mentality. Apartheid required the coloreds to live in separate areas other than where the whites lived and live a life devoid of most facilities provided by the state.Answer:
Nonwhites were forced to live in separate areas from the white
minority
Select all of the rights protected under the First Amendment.
This is an all or nothing question, meaning that it must be entirely correct to earn the points.
Freedom of Religion
Right to Peaceably Assemble
Freedom from Monarchs
Freedom to Choose Own Type of Government
Freedom of Press
Freedom of Speech
Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances
Answer:
The right answers are:
Freedom of Religion
Right to Peaceably Assemble
Freedom of Press
Freedom of Speech
Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances
Explanation:
Answer:
Freedom of Religion
Right to Peaceably Assemble
Freedom of Press
Freedom of Speech
Right to Petition the Government for Redress of Grievances
Explanation:
what is the social structure employed by hindus but rejected by buddhist that kept citizens in a rigid hierarchical state
The social structure employed by the Hindus but rejected by the Buddhists is the caste system.
Explanation:
There are several things that define India and that are unique to its society, and one of those trademarks is the caste system. This system is a social structure that has been practiced for thousands of year. The caste system has been implemented by the Hindus, and has been essential part of the Hindu society.
The Buddhist, on the other hand, became majority in India in one period, and the caste system was rejected by them, as it was a system that was discriminatory and restrictive, especially toward the members of the lower castes, and that was not what the Buddhism encourages. That didn't lasted long though, and once the Hindus became majority again, the caste system again became part of the whole subcontinent. It was only recently that the caste system has been outlawed and made illegal, as it was seen as a social structure that harms the society and its progress.
Learn more about Buddhism https://brainly.com/question/12315545
#learnwithBrainly
The social structure employed by Hindus, but rejected by Buddhists, is the caste system. Buddhism promotes equality and liberation from worldly attachments.
Explanation:The social structure employed by Hindus, but rejected by Buddhists, is the caste system. It is a hierarchical social system that assigns individuals to different social classes based on their birth, occupation, and privileges. The caste system is deeply rooted in Hindu religious beliefs, such as karma and reincarnation, and it aims to ensure that people fulfill their proper roles in society based on their past actions. Buddhism, on the other hand, rejects the caste system and promotes equality and liberation from worldly attachments.
Learn more about Caste system here:https://brainly.com/question/40214168
#SPJ11
_____ was founded in 1860 with delegates from the border states of Maryland, Kentucky, And Missouri.
1) The constitutional union party
2) Green peace
3) NAFTA
4)NATO
1) The constitutional union party
Explanation:
The party was founded by John J. Crittenden and John Bell.It lasted for only a year.Bell was even a candidate for the president, and won around 12 percent of votes.Learn more on The constitutional union party on
https://brainly.com/question/480476
#learnwithBrainly
Which TWO sentences describe the demographic effects of the Agricultural Revolution?
The percentage of the total population living in urban areas increased.
The rural population increased steadily, while the urban population stabilized.
The urban population increased steadily, while the total population stabilized.
The percentage of the workforce employed in agriculture decreased.
The percentage of the workforce employed in agriculture increased.
Answer:
The urban population increased steadily, while the total population stabilized.
The percentage of the workforce employed in agriculture increased.
Explanation:
The correct answers are A) The percentage of the total population living in urban areas increased and C) The urban population increased steadily, while the total population stabilized.
The TWO sentences that describe the demographic effects of the Agricultural Revolution are "The percentage of the total population living in urban areas increased and the urban population increased steadily, while the total population stabilized."
Technological advancements were at the very front of the progress made by Agriculture and farming during the Agriculture Revolution. These new techniques made the population grow. From 1700 to 1860, Great Britain continued to progress and increased the production of food. The population grew in England from 5.5 million in the 1700s to 32 million at the end of the 1900s.
Which of Hitler's foreign policy aims was more to blame for the outbreak of WWII?
Group of answer choices
To acquire living space in Eastern Europe.
To destroy the Treaty of Versailles
To create a stronger economy in Germany.
To create a greater Germany.
Answer:
I thought it was to destroy the treaty of versallies
Explanation:
"Adolf Hitler came to power with the goal of establishing a new racial order in Europe dominated by the German “master race.” This goal drove Nazi foreign policy, which aimed to: throw off the restrictions imposed by the Treaty of Versailles; incorporate territories with ethnic German populations into the Reich; acquire ..."
What battle ended the Revolutionary war and how?
Answer:
The last battle of the war was the Siege of Yorktown. The Continental Army sorrounded the British fortified position and the French ships blasted it from the sea. It ended with the surrender in the field of the British commander Gen. Charles Cornwallis on October 17, 1781.
Explanation:
Of the three traditional branches of government, which one encroaches that most on others particularly in a representative republic?why?
Answer:
Legislative because there the (Senate and House of Representatives
Explanation:mark the brainliest plz
Of the three traditional branches of government, it is the legislative branch that encroaches most on others particularly in a representative republic.
What are the branches of government?In a nation, for the smooth running of the government, there are very few strings required by the one who is responsible for all the decisions that are to be taken for the good and benefit of the nation.
The government, as the ruling government position, is responsible for making all kinds of decisions to make responsibilities easier and smoother. There is a distribution of responsibilities among the governments.
But the question is who will be held accountable; historically, three branches of government have been allies: executive, legislative, and judicial.
Therefore, the most important one is the legislative branch.
Learn more about the branches of government from here:
https://brainly.com/question/28397046
#SPJ2
the leader of the Athenian empire worked to
Answer:
The leader of the Athenian Empire worked to give citizens 'direct input' into the government.
Explanation:
Cleisthenes, one of the most visionary leaders Athens has ever had, believed in the participation of common citizens in the government so that it would be easy to make it more and more people-centric. It was his idea that if the people give inputs about how they want the administration to function, the mean of all suggestions given by them would be the best way to govern.Identify three cultural differences immigrants might have faced when they arrived in the United States
Answer:
Immigrants might have had to learn a new language when they came to the United States. They also may have had to change their style to fit into our culture. Also the food here is different so they may of had to find something new they liked.
Explanation:
Answer:
language
religion
education
food
jobs
holidays
traditions and customs
Explanation:
edge  ̄▽ ̄
How much were farmers getting payed in 1920
In the 1920s, U.S. farmers faced hard economic times, with earnings falling due to overproduction and plummeting commodity prices. From 70 cents to 10 cents per bushel, farm earnings dropped significantly, leading to a wave of farm foreclosures and reduced average daily wage rates for farmworkers.
In the decade following World War I, the economic situation for farmers in the United States was dire. Starting in 1920, the farmers' earnings were dramatically affected, with prices dropping from 70 cents per bushel at the beginning of the 1920s to just 10 cents by the end of the decade. The problem of overproduction led to a surplus of food, causing price collapse and triggering a wave of farm foreclosures.
Farmers struggled to recuperate the money they had borrowed during the war to increase production, and commodity prices such as corn, wheat, and pork plummeted. The average daily wage rate for a farmworker also decreased from $2.82 in 1920 to $2.30 by 1929, adding to the financial strain. The hardship for farmers continued into the Great Depression, with many losing their land and livelihoods in the ensuing years.
Why did Adam's plan to encourage advancements in literature, the arts, and science fail?
A) These efforts reached beyond the duties the Constitution gave to the president.
B) There was not enough money in the United States Treasury to finance these efforts.
C) Americans did not feel that arts and literature were important.
D) The United States' accomplishments in literature, art, and science already exceeded that of other nations.
Answer:
Explanation:
B) There was not enough money in the United States Treasury to finance these efforts.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
How did King Menelik Il differ from other 19th-century African leaders?
Answer:
Menelik II differed from other 19th-century African leaders as he kept the independence of his kingdom intact.
Explanation:
Menelik II is considered to be one of the greatest kings of Ethiopia. His expansion campaigns and his defense strategies are praised and remembered until today because the present-day borders of Ethiopia are only up to where King Menelik II expanded them to. During his reign, he had to fight the Italian army. He did it and he succeeded in driving back the possible Italian invasion of Ethiopia.Which of the following city-states is a still a major city in Greece today?
A. Sparta
B. Athens
C. Thebes
D. Crete
Answer:b
(B)
Explanation:
What was President Truman saying about the Soviet Union?
Truman had already adopted an aggressive public stance against Russia in October of 1945.
Explanation:
He produced 12 items that he said would be governed by US policy, including the importance of opening up free markets. This program would be based on 'fairness and justice'. There can be 'no compromise with evil'. As half of his items were aimed at Soviet rule in Eastern Europe, it was clear what evil he meant. He added that no one would be allowed to interfere in US politics in Latin America. In short, Soviet interference with countries essential to its security was evil. But the US's exclusive dominance in its own sphere of interest was fair. The Soviets must have thought this was a nice hoax. In any case, a program based on 'no compromise with evil' is an absurdly naive basis for foreign policy, which condemns the country to a permanent state of war. Around this time, General Patton, among other prominent figures, spoke of the 'imminent Third World War').Learn more on Harry Truman on
https://brainly.com/question/7443963
https://brainly.com/question/1528202
https://brainly.com/question/1365960
#learnwithBrainly
The influence of the media on political discussion
The media influences political discussion in many, many ways. A few of them are:
I) It defines what is object of political discussion. When a journalistic report is made on a subject that wasn't a matter of public concern, it has many more chances to become a public concern.
II) One implication of the previous item is that the media has the power to shape what is believed to be a public matter.
III) It can also define what is not an object of political discussion. If the media doesn't report on a public demonstration, for example, it is saying that it is not important and it doesn't deserve attention.
IV) The media has the power to direct the public's attention. That means it is able to define what the public's attention will turn to. If it is to one or another scandal, corruption case, etc.
V) The media can change the course of a political discussion. Because it is able to direct the public's attention the media can directly influence the course of a public discussion. It can define if at a certain point the public will be paying attention to Congress or some politician's personal life, for example.
According to the poster, what is responsible for the sinking of the ship?
the captain
the shipmate
careless words
the design of the ship
According to the poster, careless words are responsible for the sinking of the ship.
Answer: Option C
Explanation:
This poster was created by Fischer and Anton Otto during the WW II. The poster has the scenario of a ship burning in the sea meanwhile the sailors were rowing lifeboat away from the ship.
Some of them were wearing life jackets and some of them were wounded. It also contains wording that " A Careless Word" on the top and " Needless Sinking" at the bottom. This poster is one of the collections of the WW II collection named American War Posters.
What is the difference between nationalism and internationalism ?
Answer:
Nationalism denotes idea, feelings & action related to indigenous, patriotic essence; whereas, Internationalism holds up closeness with globalization. The senses of nationalism and internationalism are ordained from opposite poles. So, differences are inevitable between them
Explanation:
What traits in a source can be evaluated to help identify bias?
Claims
Tone
Reasons
Evidence
Raw Information
Answer:
Evidence
Claims
Explanation:
Evidence is the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
Claims is the state or assertion that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof.
7. Because birth rates have begun to fall Earth's population will
a. soon stabilize at the level it is today-more than 7 billion.
b. begin to decrease until it reaches 5 billion.
c. increase for a short time and then decrease to current levels.
d. stabilize somewhere around 9 billion by 2300.
Because birth rates have begun to fall Earth's population will stabilize somewhere around 9 billion by 2300.
Answer: Option D
Explanation:
During the modern age there was a rapid growth in the population. Those times there were adequate food supply and better hygiene. Now the birth rate has progressively come down. As women were educated of family planning and techniques on child care the modern women have lowered birth rates.
But the decrease in birth rate is just a mirage as it is equal when compared in urbanization and there is decline in the death rate too. The fact is that the birth rate is actually not deteriorating but it is definite pace.
Earth's population is predicted to grow until around the mid-21st century, peaking at about 9.6 billion before potentially declining. The population is expected to stabilize by 2100, possibly at levels above today's numbers.
Explanation:The question is addressing predictions about Earth's population growth and stabilization. Based on the provided references and current demographic trends, it appears that the world population is expected to continue growing until around the middle of the 21st century, peaking at about 9.6 billion, and then possibly starting to decline towards the end of the century. While birth rates are declining globally, the overall population will temporarily be sustained by increasing longevity. Different agencies suggest that the Earth's population is likely to stabilize by 2100, possibly at numbers slightly higher than today, before it begins to decline.
Considering the information provided, the most accurate answer to the student's question would likely be:
Because birth rates have begun to fall Earth's population will increase for a short time and then decrease to currentlevels.
However, this assertion seems to be more cautious and conservative compared to the general consensus that predicts a stabilization around 9 billion by 2300, as stated in some of the references.
how did the "peace of god" movement and the international peace conference at the hague influence the u.s war department's 1940 code conduct
International peace conference held at Hague aimed at world disarmament
Explanation:
International peace conference which was called by Tsar of Russia to discuss the disarmament and use of weapons to the minimum and it also aimed for maintaining peace and stability. It was held at Hague. Tsar of Russia sought some financial assistance in making the country strong with unique military arsenal and he called for the convention. Tsar of Russia desired to match and compete with the military strength of Austria and Germany.
But the conference was not fruitful but some rules and conventions were maintained and framed in case of a series of war. This conference also facilitated the establishment of international code of arbitration. It also influenced the code of conduct both allied and axis powers in both the world wars.
How were President de Klerk and former President
Botha different?
Botha was more focused on conciliation.
De Klerk was more opposed to progress
Botha was more motivated to make changes.
D
De Klerk was more willing to compromise.
Answer:
The right option is D. De Klerk was more willing to compromise.
Explanation:
Frederik Willem de Klerk (1936-) was the last white president of South Africa (1989-1994), the last state leader of the racist apartheid regime of racial segregation. He released Nelson Mandela and negotiatied with him and Mandela´s African National Congress a political transition to majority rule.
Which is Necessary for a society to be considered a civilization choose all answers that are correct
A.division of Labor
B. Organized schools
C.a hierarchy of priests
D.literature
E.more food than is needed for survival
The correct answers are A and E: division of labor, and a surplus production ("more food than is needed for survival").
These are a few of the fundamental elements in deciding if a society is or is not a civilization. There are four main qualities that a society must have in order for historians to consider it a civilization:
Division of labor;
Surplus production;
Social stratification;
Writing.
Role of prithivi narayan shah in unification of nepal?
Read the passage.
Nina worked in a clothing factory in 1900. When a fire broke out in the factory, Nina’s arms were burned so badly that she could not work for weeks. Nina was fired and her family had to live without her income, while her former employer hired a new worker right away.
Which Progressive Era reform would have helped Nina?
union
boycott
antitrust law
labor standards law
Answer:
The labor standards law would have helped Nina.
Explanation:
If the labor standards law would have been in place, the employer would have had to compensate Nina for her loss. This would have been because as per the labor standards law, it is the responsibility of the employer to take care of the employees at work. The laws not only guarantee safe working conditions but also offer job security, minimum wage limit, and protection against hardship or exploitation.Answer:
d
Explanation:
4. Concurrent jurisdiction allows for which court(s) to hear a case? (1)
Concurrent Jurisdiction allows state and federal courts to hear the case.
Explanation:
Concurrent Jurisdiction means the authority to hear a civil or a criminal case by more than one court. The states courts have the right to hear the case dealt by the federal courts too in US. It can also exist in different levels of state courts, familial courts and other government agencies. It can also make some determinations on the outcome of the case by both state and federal courts.
Mostly state courts have general Jurisdiction which it hears the cases if the residents by implementing the corresponding state laws. federal courts most often deal with the cases which may be of national significance. Diversity Jurisdiction exists when the parties of different states fall in a dispute which may involve more than ten thousand US Dollars.
Concurrent jurisdiction allows state and federal courts to hear the same case, which includes situations involving federal laws or diverse citizenship.
Explanation:Concurrent jurisdiction allows both state courts and federal courts to hear a case, depending on the circumstances. It emerges in situations where a case involves federal law, or when a lawsuit features diverse citizenship, meaning the parties involved are from different states.
With concurrent jurisdiction, plaintiffs have the opportunity for forum shopping, opting for the court that may be most favorable to their case.
This doesn't imply that all cases can be heard in both state and federal courts; certain matters, such as those involving federal questions or exclusive statutes, are limited to the federal level due to exclusive jurisdiction.
what were the constitutional crisis of 1954 to 1955
Constitutional crisis is something which the government is unable to resolve and the constitution does not give any clarity regarding the issue. Colored vote constitutional crisis happened in 1955.
Explanation:
Colored vote constitutional crisis is also called the colored vote case. The Federal government decided to remove colored voters from the common voters list. This caused a conflict between the judiciary and other branches regarding the power of Parliament to alter the entrenched clause in the act mentioned in the constitution or veto that the constitutional amendment is not legal.
The crisis at last got a final conclusion when the government decided to enlarge the senate and modify the process of election of its representatives and amending the constitution by giving franchising rights to the colored voters.