Which of the following was a result of a US Mexican war?
A) United Americans against a common enemy.
B) begin the respect of European nations for America’s military power.
C) enable the United States to annex Texas
D) I give the United States territory know as the Mexican Cession

Mercantilism was an economic policy that centered on accumulating gold and silver through favorable trade balances enforced by high tariffs and other trade controls.

The conclusion regarding mercantilism that is MOST LIKELY accurate is A) Mercantilism promoted the accumulation of gold and silver by governments. The core principle of mercantilism was the accumulation of precious metals as a measure of a nation's wealth.

Governments enforced mercantilist policies such as high tariffs, monopolies, and trade regulation, to maintain a favorable balance of trade, meaning exporting more than importing, and to increase the stockpile of gold and silver. This economic policy opposed free trade, instead creating restrictive environments meant to benefit the mother country at the expense of colonies and other nations. By exporting more than they imported, mercantilist nations aimed to ensure that more gold and silver flowed into the country than flowed out.

The correct answer is B. The government's response to the earthquake was widely criticized by the Mexican society, being seen incompetent to solve the problems generated by the phenomenom. Due to the fact that most of the collapsed buildings were of recent construction and public works projects (bridges, stadiums, routes, public buildings, etc), the government was seen at fault due to mismanagement and corruption in these constructions.

Your answer is government officials for failure to respond quickly.

B is the correct answer.

As a result of Washington's choice, each Executive Department head is known as the "Secretary"

The State Department is led by the Secretary of State, The Treasury Department is led by the Secretary of the Treasury and so forth.

To run the department within the Executive Branch, people choose  secretary.

Executive branches are the administrative arms of the U.S. President. There are currently 15 such executive branches. They look after the enforcement of laws.

In order to run each department of the Executive Branch, the people select a Secretary except the Department of Justice, which is headed by the Attorney General.

Therefore, option B aptly describes the statements.

Learn more about executive branch here:

https://brainly.com/question/18052177

The American principle of justice holds that every person, regardless of their wealth or power, is accountable if they break the law. This embodies the rule of law inherent in the American judicial system, ensuring equal treatment and guaranteeing the right to a fair trial.

The correct answer to the question, 'Which statement about the American principle of justice is true?' is option A: Any person, no matter how wealthy or powerful, is held accountable if he or she breaks a law. This statement embodies the principle of rule of law inherent in the American justice system. Under this principle, everyone is subject to the law and can be held accountable for their actions regardless of their status. The American justice system, based on the Constitution, maintains that everyone has the right to due process and equal protection. This means that every citizen must be treated equally under the law, and that the government ensures a fair trial by providing a balanced and impartial tribunal. While it's important to know that every system has its flaws, the foundational principles of the American judicial system work towards combating these issues and upholding the law.

https://brainly.com/question/14759361

#SPJ3

The legislation that most closely matches the work of Ida Tarbell is the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890. This law was introduced to prevent the formation and operation of monopolies in the oil industry. It is believed that Tarbell's story, The History of the Standard Oil Company, contributed to the collapse of Standard Oil, which happened when the US Supreme Court ruled that the company in question was violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.

Answer:

The Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890

Explanation:

Because it was designed to prevent the formation and operation of monopolies, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890 is the legislation that was most closely related to the work of Ida Tarbell. The History of Standard Oil Company was credited with contributing to the breakup of Standard Oil, which came about when the Supreme Court of the United States found the company to be violating the Sherman Antitrust Act.

It went down because after the war,they had many heavy casualties both allies , U.S civilians,and U.S soldiers.Also they had to pay for the materials to make the tanks,planes,equipment,and bombs.

In 1965, three teenagers from Iowa Marie Beth Tinker, her brother John and their friend Christopher Eckhardt decided to protest peacefully against the Vietnam War, wearing armbands in their public schools. School officials saw this as a violation of discipline and that students who wore armbands had to remove them or be suspended. Teenagers did not want to do it, and the district suspended them until their protest was over.

Parents of children filed a lawsuit against the school district, arguing that the school violated students' free speech. The lower courts confirmed the school district's decision as necessary to maintain discipline, so parents complained to the Supreme Court of the decision. In 1969, the Supreme Court listened to the Tinker case against the Des Moines Independent School District.

One important aspect of Tinker's case was that students' protest was not in the form of a written or pronounced expression, but instead used the symbol: armbands.

The Supreme Court ruled that the armbands were in the form of a symbolic speech, which was protected by the First Amendment, and therefore the school violated the rights of the student to a symbolic speech guaranteed by the First Amendment. The silent protest did not interfere with the work of the school in any way, and therefore the restriction of the school district of students' free speech was not justified.

So, the answer is YES, this case illustrates constitutional protection of symbolic speech.

Answer:

Explanation:

A, symbolic speech

Marcus Garvey organized the first international racial conference in NYC.

Marcus Garvey, a black nationalist, who was born in Jamaica, was the founder of the Pan-Africanism movement, which aimed to bring together and connect all persons of African heritage.

Learn more about Marcus Garvey here:

https://brainly.com/question/6818410?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ2

The correct answer to this question is English.  Many countries had an influence on their legal and court systems by other more developed ones. Americans were influenced by England's North American colonies and English common law.  There were other influences like the Roman civil law.

Answer:

i just finished the exam the answer is  English

Explanation:

They became true enemies i think

the answer is 2 march 1962  - Burmese General Ne Win led a military coup d'etat in Burma.

Answer: The right answer is 1962.

Explanation: Just to elaborate a little on the answer, it can also be added that General Ne Win (1911-2002), acting as Army Chief of Staff, had been previously in charge of bringing a relative and temporary stability to the republic, who had gained its independence from England in 1948. However, that stability did not last, and on March 2, 1962, he staged a coup d’état, becoming Prime Minister and head of the state. Ne Win suspended the constitution and placed the army in control of virtually all aspects of governement. Education, health care and economy were nationalized, and protests from students, workers, and political opponents were violently suppressed. He resigned from power in 1988.    

He was 67 when he died (:

George Washington was born on February 22, 1732 and served as a general and commander-in-chief of colonial armies durning the American Revolution

Thomas Jefferson a democratic-republican.

i think it is c because it provides it

There are several skills that historians need to be able to perform their activities, but among them, three that are very important are: Interpretation, comparison and contextualization. Contextualization, is, basically, the ability to place knowledge within a context and understand said knowledge under the light of a time, a place, a society, a culture and a series of events that are interconnected. And it allows a historian to draw conclusions that are free from any guessing or misinterpretation. One scenario in which a historian might apply this very important skill would be understanding the reasoning behind an event like the Cold War. What led to it? What were the reasons behind it? And a historian might learn by applying contextualization that it is impossible to understand an event like the Cold War unless he/she understands the mindset and complexity of beliefs, customs and ways of thinking and acting that took place during such a time.

Historical thinking skills crucial for historians include critical thinking, analysis, and creativity. Using critical thinking, a historian can evaluate primary documents to understand deeply the complexities of the Civil Rights Movement. This skill leads to a more nuanced historical perspective.

Historians utilize a variety of historical thinking skills to understand and interpret the past. These skills include critical thinking, which allows historians to evaluate sources and arguments; analysis, which aids in understanding complex historical data; and creativity, which is essential for forming novel interpretations of historical events.

To elaborate on the skill of critical thinking, imagine a historian analyzing primary documents from the Civil Rights Movement. By critically evaluating these sources, considering their authors, intents, and contexts, the historian can understand the motivations behind actions taken during that period and gain insight into the social and political dynamics at play. This skill enables historians to construct a more nuanced and accurate representation of the past.

By applying critical thinking, historians can uncover biases, establish credibility, and ultimately provide a clearer picture of history, offering invaluable insight to readers and contributing to a more informed society.

the answer is C) britain

The correct answer is: "Plessy v. Ferguson"

Plessy vs Ferguson was a landmark decision enacted by the US Supreme Court in 1896, which legimitized the existence of segregated public education facilities as long as these were equal in quality. It actually introduced the principle of "separate but equal".

In the Plessy v. Ferguson the justices had considered that, as long as equal quality was provided, segregation was not violating the Equal Protection Clause included in the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution. Therefore, segregation was not contrary to the US Constitution and therefore legitime. Fortunately, the Supreme Court in 1954, in  the case of Brown v. Board of Education understood it differently, and dismantled segregation forever.

Answer:

A.

Explanation:

Answer:

The answer is A.

Explanation:

      1.   The way the Mexica interacted with the environment was impacted by the location of Tenochtitlan because it was founded on a small island within Lake Texcoco and it was connected to the mainland by bridges and causeways leading to the north, south and west, these causeways were interrupted by bridges that allowed canoes and other water traffic to pass freely (these bridges were movable, so the people were able to pull them away, if necessary, to defend the city. All sections of the city could be visited either on foot or via canoe because it was interlaced with a series of canals.    

      2.   Economically the role the city played a role in agriculture and commerce, basically, commerce was to be realized by barter and they used, as a type of coin, grains of cocoa and also beans.

      3.    This term was applied to anyone originating from the vast Northern and Central Asian landmass which was back then known as the Tartary and was dominated by several mostly Turco-Mongol empires and kingdoms.  More recently, however, the term refers to speak one of the Turkic languages.  The Tatar clan still exists among the Mongols, Hazaras and Uzbeks.

      4.   Pastoralism is a branch of agriculture concerned with the raising of livestock. It is the care, tending and use of animals such as cattle, camels, goats, yaks, llamas, reindeers, horses and sheep.  They moved all the time to find better pastures for their animals.

      4.    There is greatly  gender inequality: Men lead the community or tribe, worth is quantified by size of herd, control the herd and are responsible for defense of the herd, on the other hand, women care for the children in the family unit and for others, are responsible for things like cleaning, cooking and maintenance, milking livestock and have a miniscule political and economic power in community .

      5.   In Europe, women were used in commerce which promoted them more freedom.   In most cultures and religions did not have  an equal status to a man and were only useful to bear children and they were looked at as subservient, obedient creatures.  Choosing a spouse who was a good worker and winning an appropriate dowry or inheritance were vital ingredients of family life.  Adult men and women roughly divided labor between field and household.

The South was primarily agricultural and rural. Moreover, prior to 1865, the largest workforce in the South was enslaved Fewer opportunities existed for immigrants in this region than in the bustling urban areas of the North. The answer is C.

Final answer:

Slaves handling nearly all labor needs in the South reduced the necessity for immigrant labor, making the South unattractive for immigration due to social climate and lack of economic opportunities.

Explanation:

The correct answer that best describes why there was no significant need for immigrants to live in the South is primarily C. Slaves handled nearly all the labor needs. The southern economy was heavily dependent on slavery before the Civil War and slaves were the main source of labor, particularly in the agricultural sector. This reduced the demand for immigrant labor. Furthermore, the lack of major ports and manufacturing jobs, and the non-availability of farmland made the South unattractive to immigrants. Additionally, the social climate and entrenched institution of slavery in the South were uninviting for immigrants seeking new opportunities.

Ronald Reagan is the correct answer.

Unlike Jimmy Carter, who was focused on helping America confront the very real challenges that it faced with his speech about America's malaise, Ronald Reagan was focused on an optimistic, perhaps even panglossian, vision for America's future.

The answer is:

Ronald Reagan

Hope this helps!

Federalists. Along with John Jay and Alexander Hamilton, James Madison penned The Federalist Papers. The supporters of the proposed Constitution called themselves "Federalists." Their adopted name implied a commitment to a loose, decentralized system of government.

Businessmen and New Englanders.

There were a variety of changes in American society in the 1840’s. Women started looking for their civil rights, the equality in salaries between men and women, in general the equal treatment in the society. States in North America double the money for schools, this was to improve education for children. In 1840 anti- slavery groups increased, and also black people was fighting for their rights.

Final answer:

In the 1840s, out-of-the-box thinking spurred changes in American society through innovative entrepreneurship, technological breakthroughs, and the development of utopian communities that aimed for a more equitable society.

Explanation:

In the 1840s, out-of-the-box thinking inspired significant change in American society by fostering entrepreneurial ventures, technological innovations, and the creation of utopian communities. During this era, Americans witnessed the emergence of religious utopian societies, attempts to redesign work and living situations for industrial workers, and an overall spirit of innovation that defined the pre-Civil War period.

Moreover, the booming market economy, rapid western expansion, and technological advancements - such as improvements in transportation and printing technologies - all contributed to this dynamism, unleashing new economic opportunities and facilitating societal reforms. Notable utopian communities attempted to realize ideals of equality and harmony, aiming to reshape American civilization with more just and equitable relations. The contributions of influential industrialists like Robert Owen, who sought to improve factory conditions and workers' quality of life, reflected progressive thinking that eventually influenced the broader fabric of American life.

United States foreign policy in the Middle East has its roots as early as the Barbary Wars in the first years of the U.S.'s existence, but became much more expansive after World War II. American policy during the Cold War tried to prevent Soviet Union influence by supporting anti-communist regimes and backing Israel against Soviet-sponsored Arab countries. The U.S. also came to replace the United Kingdom as the main security patron of the Persian Gulf states in the 1960s and 1970s, working to ensure a stable flow of Gulf oil.[1] Since the 9/11 attacks of 2001, U.S. policy has included an emphasis on counter-terrorism. The U.S. has diplomatic relations with all countries in the Middle East except for Iran, whose 1979 revolution brought to power a staunchly anti-American regime.

The United States was extensively involved in the Middle East given its support for the establishment of Israel in 1948. Like other parts of the world, the Middle East and its nations became pawns in the Cold War contestation between Russia and the United States. The US. helped to broker a cease fire between Israel and its five Arab state neighbors to end the conflict in 1948. Ralph Bunche won the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts in this regard. The United States also worked to challenge the Pan-Arab movement promoted by Gamel Nassser, President of Egypt. This led to the Suez Conflict in 1956. Israel also participated in the Six Day War (1967) and the Yom Kippur War in 1973. President Carter negotiated the Camp David Accords in 1978, which brought peace between Egypt and Israel. This accord led to the assassination of Anwar Sadat in 1981. The United States has also been a staunch ally of Saudi Arabia because of its oil reserves. The US has also been involved in the Palestinian conflict.  The United States provided military equipment, technological expertise, diplomatic negotiation, and military force--stationing troops in Lebanon and subsequent involvement in conflicts in the early 1990's in the Near East (Kuwait and Iraq) and subsequent involvement in the invasion of Iraq in the early 21st century.

Question: How did many African Americans in the South respond to the enactment of Jim Crow Laws?

Options:

Answer: They moved out of the South.

Explanation: The African‐Americans in the south responded to the increasing discrimination due to the Jim Crow Laws in many ways, but the most common response was moving out of the South. It started with the Great Migration of African‐Americans, moving from the South to the urban North. This began in the 1890s, and some even went back to Africa.

Answers A and D are incorrect.

The idea of Détente grew as the United States, the Soviet Union and their respective allies sought to reduce the risk of nuclear war. Nevertheless, the Communists used subtle methods of repression: intimidation, imprisonment, refusal of access to studies, refusal to work or dismissal for political reasons.

The legitimacy of communism has been destroyed by the regular condemnation of these practices by the international press because one of the central objectives of the West was the promotion of human rights.

Answer C is the correct answer

i would say the answer is c or d because i learned it was around 2-3

The harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles put Germany in a situation that allowed the rise of Hitler and the Nazis, leading to World War II.

The Treaty of Versailles, which came out of the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, was very punitive towards Germany.  Germany was forced to admit responsibility for causing the Great War (World War I).  We now call that "the war guilt" clause of the treaty.  Germany also was forced to pay large reparation payments to the Allies (who opposed Germany in the war).   Germany also had to give up large portions of its territory and lost colonial territories.  And the German military had major restrictions imposed on it -- it had to be a volunteer military only, of no more than 100,000 men, and they could not have an air force.

The German economy and national pride were deeply wounded by the terms imposed by the Treaty of Versailles.  Coupled with that, the Great Depression (which had worldwide impact) made the economic situation even worse.  The bad situation in Germany made it possible for a radical leader like Hitler, making all sorts of bold promises, to win over enough people to rise to power.  Hitler promised a return to national greatness and fiercely rebuilt Germany as a military machine.  The rise of Hitler and the Nazis brought about World War II in Europe.

After World War I, Germany experienced severe economic hardships, highlighted by hyperinflation, unemployment, and the burdens of the Treaty of Versailles. These conditions set the stage for political unrest, propelling extremist parties such as the Nazis to the forefront of German politics. The political effect was a destabilization of the Weimar Republic and the eventual rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party, leading to authoritarian rule over Germany.

The Great Depression and the economic difficulties post-World War I created a perfect storm for the Nazi Party's ascendancy. The punitive reparations and military restrictions imposed by the Treaty of Versailles bred resentment and national humiliation. Coupled with the global economic downturn, this led to widespread unemployment and poverty, stirring anger and desperation among the German people. The Weimar Republic, perceived as weak and ineffective, failed to manage these crises, driving citizens towards extremist solutions. The Nazi Party, exploiting the social and economic turmoil, promoted a strong, unified Germany and found scapegoats for the nation's woes. Hitler's charismatic oratory and propaganda efforts convinced many that the Nazis could restore Germany's former glory, culminating in their democratic electoral success and Hitler's eventual appointment as Chancellor, which marked a significant political shift in Germany and Europe.