Which of the following was one event that convinced early American leaders that the Articles of Confederation needed to be replaced by a document that would provide for a stronger central government? A.
the Nullification Crisis
B.
Shays' Rebellion
C.
the Boston Tea Party
D.
the outbreak of the War of 1812

they are monarchy and dictatorship

It was the refinement of the Bessemer process, first used in the United States in the 1860s, that allowed for the major advance in skyscraper construction. As steel is stronger and lighter in weight than iron, the use of a steel frame made possible the construction of truly tall buildings.

Some early skyscrapers have a steel frame that enables the construction of load-bearing walls taller than of those made of reinforced concrete. Modern skyscrapers' walls are not load-bearing, and most skyscrapers are characterized by large surface areas of windows made possible by steel frames and curtain walls.The development of skyscrapers came as a result of the coincidence of several technological and social developments.

im sleepy and im not sure on the answer but i think it is a b c

The correct answers are A) peaceful non-violent resistance to foreign rule,  B) taking up arms to overthrown terms of unfair peace treaties established by the allies of World War 1, and C) westernizing in the areas of science and technology.

The nationalistic ideology of early twentieth century Asian leaders includes peaceful non-violent resistance to foreign rule,  taking up arms to overthrown terms of unfair peace treaties established by the allies of World War 1, and westernizing in the areas of science and technology.

Nationalism started in the 19th century in Europe. It supports the national identity, tradition, history, and values of the nation. Nationalism surged in Asia countries due to the influence of Western nations and their foreign policy. For instance, the Meiji Restoration of 1868 in Japan, where nationalistic ideas served as the base of the strength of the Japanese Empire.

Answer:

European and foreign powers were more likely to help the colonies and the fact that it was so widely spread.

Thomas Paine’s Common Sense advocated for American independence by presenting simple and clear arguments against British rule and the concept of monarchy, making the idea of a republican government and self-governance relatable to ordinary people, which increased support for independence and influenced the creation of the Declaration of Independence.

Thomas Paine's Common Sense and Support for Independence

According to Robert Middlekauff, one key way Thomas Paine's Common Sense promoted support for independence was through its straightforward, understandable language that reached a broad audience. Paine's arguments against monarchy and the British Empire struck a chord with many colonists, aiding the shift in public opinion towards independence. His approach to presenting simple facts, plain arguments, and common sense made the complex political arguments accessible and compelling, ultimately influencing the sentiment of Congress and accelerating the adoption of the Declaration of Independence.

The pamphlet notably made a case for a republican form of government as opposed to hereditary monarchy, empowering the colonies to aspire to self-governance. By simplifying what had been discussed by congressional and provincial assemblies, Paine made the case for independence not just a scholarly debate, but a tangible possibility for the average colonist. His radical ideas and persuasive rhetoric were instrumental in the colonies' decision to seek freedom from British rule, thereby igniting a new era in American history.

Frederick Lugard justifies Britain's actions of imperialism by saying that Britain will be honoured for its efforts to improve foreign societies.

In "The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa", Lugard argues that Britain needed to provide for their growing population by opening new markets, opportunity for emigration, employment and taking raw materials that were not being used in Africa. In exchange, they would bring the benefits of western political organization, commerce and infrastructures.

Answer:

The correct answer is: "Britain will be honored for its efforts to improve foreign societies."

Explanation:

Hope this helps!!!

Nikita Khrushchev and Mikhail Gorbachev. Hope this helps you :D

He fled the Massachusetts colony over his controversial religious beliefs.

The House of Representatives

Hope This Helped

House of Representatives is the answer

The Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, when it officialy granted self-governing to it's republics and was reduced to Russia. Moscow had began losing control in 1988 and in 1990 had lost six republics, Lithuania, Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Armenia and Georgia, in 1991 Boris Yeltsin was elected president and declared the end of the United Socialist Soviet Republics.

The destruction of the Soviet Union happened on 26 December 1991, authorised granting self-governing independence to the Republics of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). It was a consequence of the declaration number 142-Н of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union. The declaration recognised the independence of the former Soviet republics and formed the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), although five of the signatories approved it much later or did not do so at all.

Due to the increase in hourly wages that each employee receives each year increases every three years by $ 0.50, this means that the increase remains constant over a period of 3 years, therefore the function described by this scenario is:

y= {0.5 if x <3  

    {1 if  3 ≤ x <6  

    {1.5 if 6 ≤ x <9  

    {2  if  9 ≤ x <12

Therefore, the last graph correctly represents the salary increase for x <12.

This is an incredibly easy question. The correct answer is Columbia.

Final answer:

Colombia is the country among the given options that is located in South America.

Explanation:

Among the options provided to identify which country is in South America, Colombia is the correct answer. Mexico is located in North America, Costa Rica in Central America, and Puerto Rico is an island territory of the United States located in the Caribbean Sea. Colombia is situated in the northern part of South America and shares its borders with Venezuela to the east, Brazil to the southeast, Peru to the south, Panama to the northwest, and the Pacific Ocean to the west.

constitution i think

Most tribes come and go/conquered or mix in

Franks successful in settling - Establish roots

The Franks and Vikings differed in terms of origins, religion, and governance. The Franks were a Germanic tribe who established France and western Germany while the Vikings were seafaring Scandinavians. Around the 5th to 10th centuries, the Franks were mainly Christian while the Vikings followed Norse paganism.

The Franks and the Vikings were both important groups in the medieval period, but they differed in several significant ways. Firstly, the Franks were a Germanic tribe that eventually established the region of France and western Germany, while the Vikings were seafaring Scandinavians who raided and traded from their homelands across wide areas of Europe.

Regarding religion, around the 5th to 10th centuries, the Franks were largely Christian due to the influence of the Roman Empire, while the Vikings followed Norse paganism. It wasn’t until around the late 10th and 11th centuries that conversion to Christianity occurred significantly in Viking regions.

Their governance also differed; the Franks established a type of monarchical system under Charlemagne’s effective leadership as a king and emperor while Viking society was a combination of democracy and monarchy.

Learn more about Franks and Vikings here:

https://brainly.com/question/449407

#SPJ2

I believe the answer is 123 years not 126 but it's only a three year difference, so the answer is probably C). 126 Years

126 Years is the answer

Slaves maintained religious and cultural traditions from Africa is not true about slavery in America. Thus, option (c) is correct.

What is slavery?

A person who works for is owned by, and is under another else's authority is referred to as a “slave.” Slaves also referred to it as “slavery.” The individual is completely reliant on a strong individual, such a landlord. Enslavement can take many forms, such as forced labor and sexual slavery.

According to the slavery system of America, the slaves are the several generations of slaves. The children are too young to live with two parents' guidance. The gender ratio must be balanced. The population of the slaves is to be increased. However, slaves are not based on America's religious and cultural traditions.

As a result, slaves maintained religious and cultural traditions from Africa is not true about slavery in America. Therefore, option (c) is correct.

Learn more about slavery, here:

https://brainly.com/question/9331183

#SPJ2

However,it was in law and politics that Roman influence can be felt most strongly today.Much European law is still derived from Roman law.The ideas of equity,equality before the law,citizen's rights and elected officials,while originating through the Greeks,were all taken further by the Romans and have down to us in a basically Roman form.

Roman citizenship was provided to the people of Rome and all of them had equal rights in the eyes of the law.Even a jew in a far away province who happened to possess Roman citizenship could cry for help and that person will be taken to Caesar.The great legal digests of the late empire enshrined these principles and passed them on to future European civilisation.

In spite of the fact that you have not provided the map,  to the best of my knowledge, Italy was fully united in 1871 because In 1870, the Italian army annexed Rome and the Papal States. These additions provided Italy nearly its current boundaries, and the city of Rome became the Italian capital.

The Republican Constitution was approved on 1 January 1948.Under The Treaty of Peace with Italy of 1947,most of Julian March was lost to Yugoslavia,and later The Free Territory of Trieste was divided between the two states.Italy also lost all of its colonial possessions,formally ending the Italian Empire.

Poll taxes and literacy tests were established to limit the voting rights of African Americans.

Following the freeing of southern slaves in Abraham Lincoln's "Gettysburg Address", which led to the freeing of slaves in southern-occupied territories, and the slaves in the border states that were allied to the Union. This soon led to the defeat of the Confederates that surrendered in the Appomattox Court, where the South surrendered to the North. This soon led to the freeing of slaves, and the Reconstruction Age, in which Northern abolitionists then pushed to give equal rights for the African Americans. In the effort to stop these rights, the South tried to find different ways to limit their previous slave's rights, including Poll taxes, literacy tests (which limited their political voting powers), producing groups such as the KKK (Ku Klux Klan), which was a terror group that lynched and killed African Americans, and separation of White and African American public rooms. All of these (& more!) were used to limit the rights and make life harder for the African Americans.  

Specifically for this question, poll taxes were instituted against the African  Americans, because following the outcome of the Civil War, many African Americans could did not have any money. In an effort to limit both the Republic Party and their supporters, the South instituted the Poll Tax, which forced all voters to pay a certain fee to cast in their votes. However, this also limited the ability of poorer southerners, and so they used literacy tests instead. With the use of literacy tests, the probability of Southern whites being left out was very small while, as the percentage of previous-slave population was being able to read and write was very small), it led a greater and concentrated discrimination against the African Americans.

While literacy tests were effective in their beginning years, they waned after many African Americans started to attend and learn how to read and write. This soon led to an increase role of the KKK to keep African Americans from voting.

In the end, all of these were just a way for Southern whites to keep African Americans from voting and voicing their rights, and essentially failed, as we can see today.

Answer:

African American men.

Explanation:

he means to say the america will never be the one to start the war, only respond to threats and help our allies, he is trying to say that we will stay out of foreign conflict unless an attack is made on us or we have already agreed to aid one of our allies

Concurrent powers are powers in nations with a federal system of government that are shared by both the federal government and each constituent political unit (such as a state or province).

Concurrent powers refer to shared responsibilities between state and federal governments, which includes, among other things, the ability to collect taxes, borrow money, and establish court systems. This concept is critical to cooperative federalism, wherein both levels of government work together to address nationwide concerns.

In the context of government and law, concurrent powers refer to the abilities and authorities that are shared by both state and federal governments. These shared powers include responsibilities such as collecting taxes, borrowing money, defining and punishing crimes, and establishing court systems.

These powers are an integral part of what is referred to as cooperative federalism, where both state and federal governments work hand-in-hand to address national issues. The U.S Constitution does not give explicit exclusivity of these powers to the federal government, and hence they can be exercised by the states as well.

However, it is important to note that the distribution and execution of these powers should always align with the U.S. Constitution's design outlining the separation of powers among different levels of government.

https://brainly.com/question/2459928

#SPJ12

The United States did not directly vote for senators during the first 125 years of the federal government. The Constitution, which was adopted in 1788, declared senators elected by state legislatures. The first proposal to amend the constitution and elect senators by popular vote was presented in the House of Representatives in 1826, but the idea did not receive enough support until the 19th century, when several problems related to elections in the Senate became evident. . . Several state laws were paralyzed by the elections of the senators, which made Senate seats remain vacant for months and even years. In other cases, the political machines gained control over state laws and the senators elected with their support were seen as puppets. In addition, the Senate was perceived as the "millionaire's club". That is public service. The rise of the Popular Party, called the Populist Party, motivated the creation of a Senate more responsible to the public.

The Seventeenth The Constitution of the United States (XVII) the direct election of the United States Senate by popular vote. The amendment replaces Article I, Section 3, Clauses 1 and 2 of the constitution, under which the Senate was elected by the State Legislatures. It also alters the method of filling vacancies in the Senate, to be consistent with the method of choice. It was adopted in April 1913.

The Seventeenth Amendment is a reform because it allows citizens to participate directly in the election of representatives. Most who oppose the amendment point to the reassertion of state power in Washington and  restoring checks on federal expansion.

Answer:

guilds

Explanation:

the revolution that established Mexico as an independent republic

the revolution that established Mexico as an independent republic

Answer:

The answer is here

Explanation:

An international conference called the Paris Peace Conference was held in January 1919 at Versailles outside of Paris. Establishing the terms of the post-World War I peace was the goal of the gathering. Hence option B is correct.

The "Big Four"—Great Britain, France, the United States, and Italy—represented the almost thirty participating countries. The negotiations that resulted in the creation of the Treaty of Versailles, a document that outlined the compromises agreed at the conference, would be dominated by the "Big Four.

" A League of Nations was to be established as an international forum and system of collective security, according to the Treaty of Versailles. President Woodrow Wilson of the United States was a staunch supporter of the League because he thought it would up coming wars.

The Paris Peace Conference's negotiations were not always straightforward. As Allied Powers, Italy, France, and Great Britain engaged in joint combat throughout World War One.

Although it fought with the Allies, the United States was not required to uphold earlier commitments made by the Allied countries when it joined the war in April 1917 as an Associated Power.

Learn more about George’s Clemenceau  here

https://brainly.com/question/2049342

# SPJ 2

Islam was the most important influence on Africa caused by trade relationships with others.

Answer: Option D

Explanation:

Trade and travellers have always credited the spreading of new ideas in the region they travel to around the world and the continent of Africa is no exception to this.

It was during the 8th & 9th century when many Arab traders and also the travellers started to spread ideas of Islam in the region of Eastern coast of Africa and also in the central and western Sudan.

With time, the influence had spread so much the Rulers encouraged the construction of mosques and Islamic learning. A new method of weighing and art of writing was introduced in Africa by Islam.

Islam spread with the expansion on the Ottoman empire. When they conquer were exposed to this religion and many people converted. They also used trading to spread Islam trough southeast Asia, Africa an many more parts of the world. The first conversions were flexible, s it was easy for people to convert into Islam.

Final answer:

Brazil declared its independence from Portugal on September 7, 1822, through the Grito do Ipiranga by Crown Prince Pedro. This event transitioned Brazil from a Portuguese colony to a monarchy under Pedro I, maintaining a connection with its colonial legacy.

Explanation:

The day Brazil declared its independence from Portugal was on September 7, 1822. This pivotal event is known as the Grito do Ipiranga, where Crown Prince Pedro boldly declared Brazil's independence on the banks of the Ipiranga River in São Paulo. Following this declaration, Pedro I was crowned as the Constitutional Emperor and Perpetual Defender of Brazil, marking the start of a new chapter in Brazilian history. Unlike other Latin American countries, Brazil transitioned from Portuguese colony to a monarchy, maintaining a degree of continuity with its colonial past. This path to independence was unique because it did not immediately lead to the establishment of a republic but rather established a monarchical system under Pedro I, preserving a connection to Brazil's royal lineage.

The Columbian Exchange event best example of the population trend shown in this graph.

A population is a complete set of a group of individualists, whether that group constitutes a nation or a group of groupings with a common characteristic. In data point, a population is the pool of individuals from which a statistical sample is drawn for a study. As we see, different countries have different populations.

The Columbian Exchange because the time frame depicted in the illustrations matched the years in which this occurred. The Caribbean suffered the greatest, with most islands' Native American populations have fallen by more than 99 percent by 1600. Throughout the Americas

Therefore, option (A) is correct

Learn more about populations here:

https://brainly.com/question/27991860

#SPJ6

Great Britain’s victory over France in the Seven Years’ War, also known as the French and Indian War, gave it control over all of eastern North America. Most native tribes had allied with the French during the conflict, and they soon found themselves dissatisfied by British rule. In May 1763, just a few months after the formal conclusion of the Seven Years’ War, a pan-tribal confederacy led by Ottawa chief Pontiac rose up in rebellion. His warriors attacked a dozen British forts, capturing eight of them, and raided numerous frontier settlements. Hundreds died in the process. In response, the British handed out smallpox-infected blankets to Pontiac’s followers. Moreover, a gang of whites known as the Paxton Boys massacred 20 defenseless Native Americans who had nothing to do with the fighting.

In an attempt to prevent similar incidents from occurring, King George III issued a royal proclamation on October 7, 1763, which established three new mainland colonies (Quebec, West Florida and East Florida), extended Georgia’s southern border and gave land to soldiers who had fought in the Seven Years’ War. More notably, it banned colonial settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains, at least “for the present, and until our further pleasure be known.” Those colonists already there were ordered to relocate. Acknowledging that “great frauds and abuses have been committed,” the proclamation furthermore prohibited individuals from buying tribal territory. Instead, only the crown could now make such purchases. “We shall avoid many future quarrels with the savages by this salutary measure,” said General Thomas Gage, who commanded all British forces in North America.

The British made a perfunctory effort to enforce the proclamation, periodically stopping settlers as they headed west and forcibly removing others. On one occasion, redcoats from Fort Pitt in present-day Pittsburgh even burned the huts of some nearby pioneers and escorted them back across the boundary. For the most part, though, colonists disregarded the proclamation without fear of punishment. Some wanted only enough land for themselves and their families, whereas others were speculators looking to make a hefty profit down the road. George Washington, for one, wrote to his agent in 1767 in support of illegally buying as much Native American land as possible. The Proclamation of 1763 will soon be revoked, Washington explained, because—“this I say between ourselves”—it was only meant “as a temporary expedient to quiet the minds of the Indians.” Other famous speculators included Patrick Henry, best known for his “Give me liberty or give me death” speech, and Henry Laurens, who later served as president of the Continental Congress.

Washington’s prediction proved prescient the following year, when the British moved the boundary line westward as part of the Treaty of Fort Stanwix. Under the deal, the Iroquois agreed to give up parts of present-day New York, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia in exchange for cash, gifts and the (soon-to-be-broken) promise of a permanent border. But although the Iroquois claimed those lands, they did not live there. The tribes that did, such as the Shawnee, were infuriated, and ended up going to war with the British in 1774. Meanwhile, further south, the Cherokee surrendered tens of thousands of square miles in a series of treaties. Also losing territory were the Creeks, who purportedly referred to the colonists as Ecunnaunuxulgee, or “People greedily grasping after the lands of the red people.”

Ultimately, the new acquisitions failed to quiet colonial discontent with the Proclamation of 1763. And though it would be later overshadowed by other complaints against the British, such as the Sugar Act, the Stamp Act, the Townshend Acts, the so-called Intolerable Acts and the Boston Massacre, it remained enough of a concern that the Declaration of Independence criticized King George III for “raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.” By winning their freedom from the British in 1783, the Americans rendered the proclamation moot. But it has lived on to this day in Canada, where it forms the legal basis for native land rights. “We must recall the intent that brought all our ancestors together so many years ago,” Shawn A-in-chut Atleo, national chief of Canada’s Assembly of First Nations, said earlier today at a 250th anniversary event, “and ensure that [we live up] to the promises in the treaties and other agreements that stem from the foundation of the royal proclamation.”