Which statement explains why the perimeter of the rectangle can be found using l + w + l + w or 2l + 2w?

she "grew" negative 3.25 inches

 it is negative because she was taller in December than she was in January

The correct answers are:

A) yes; B) 0.0059; C) 0.0059; D) 1; E) 0.9872.

Explanation:

A) A binomial experiment is one in which the experiment consists of identical trials; each trial results in one of two outcomes, called success and failure; the probability of success remains the same from trial to trial; and the trials are independent.

All of these criteria fit this experiment.

B) The formula for the probability of a binomial experiment is:

[tex] _nC_r\times(p^r)(1-p)^{n-r} [/tex]

where n is the number of trials, r is the number of successes, and p is the probability of success.

In this problem, p = 0.9.

For part B, n = 100 and r = 97:

[tex] _{100}C_{97}(0.9)^{97}(1-0.9)^3
\\=\frac{100!}{97!3!}\times (0.9)^{97}(0.1)^3
\\
\\=161700(0.9)^{0.97}(0.1)^3=0.00589\approx 0.0059 [/tex]

C) We are changing the probability of success this time. Since 90% of people have had chicken pox, then 100%-90% = 1-0.9 = 0.1 have not had chicken pox. For part C, n = 100, r = 3, and p = 0.1:

[tex] _{100}C_3(0.1)^3(1-0.1)^{100-3}
\\
\\=_{100}C_3(0.1)^3(0.9)^{97}
\\=\frac{100!}{97!3!}\times (0.1)^3(0.9)^{97}
\\
\\=161700(0.1)^3(0.9)^{97}=0.00589\approx 0.0059 [/tex]

D) For this part, we want to know the probability that at least 1 person has contracted chicken pox. For this part, p = 0.9, n = 10 and r = 0. We will then subtract this from 1; this will first give us the probability that none of the 10 contracted chicken pox, then subtracting from 1 means that 1 or more people did:

[tex] 1-(_{10}C_0(0.9)^0(1-0.9)^{10-0})
\\
\\=1-(\frac{10!}{0!10!}\times (0.9)^0(0.1)^{10})
\\
\\=1-(1\times 1\times (0.1)^{10})= 1-0 = 1 [/tex]

E) For this part, we find the probability that 3 people, 2 people, 1 person and 0 people have not had chicken pox. The probability p = 0.1; n = 10; and r = 3, 2, 1 and 0, respectively:

[tex] _{10}C_3(0.1)^3(1-0.1)^{10-3}+_{10}C_2(0.1)^2(1-0.1)^{10-2}+
_{10}C_1(0.1)^1(1-0.1)^{10-1}+_{10}C_0(0.1)^0(1-0.1)^{10-0}
\\
\\=_{10}C_3(0.1)^3(0.9)^7+_{10}C_2(0.1)^2(0.9)^8+_{10}C_1(0.1)^1(0.9)^9+
_{10}C_0(0.1)^1(0.9)^{10}
\\
\\120(0.1)^3(0.9)^7+45(0.1)^2(0.9)^8+10(0.1)^1(0.9)^9+1(0.1)^0(0.9)^{10}
\\
\\0.057395628+0.1937102445+0.387420489+0.3486784401
\\
\\=0.9872 [/tex]

The binomial distribution is appropriate for calculating the probability of having a specific number of American adults who had chickenpox during childhood. The probability of exactly 97 out of 100 adults having chickenpox can be calculated using the binomial probability formula. The probability that at least 1 out of 10 adults have had chickenpox and at most 3 out of 10 adults have not had chickenpox can also be calculated using the binomial probability formula.

(a) To determine if the use of the binomial distribution is appropriate, we need to check if the conditions for using it are satisfied: (1) There are only two possible outcomes - having or not having chickenpox. (2) Each trial is independent - one person's chickenpox status does not affect another person's. (3) The probability of having chickenpox is the same for each person. The given information satisfies these conditions, so the binomial distribution is appropriate.

(b) The probability of exactly 97 out of 100 randomly sampled American adults having chickenpox during childhood can be calculated using the binomial probability formula:

P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1-p)^(n-k)

Where:

P(X = k) is the probability of getting exactly k successes (97 in this case)

C(n, k) is the number of ways to choose k successes out of n trials (100 in this case)

p is the probability of success (probability of having chickenpox = 0.90)

n is the total number of trials (100 in this case)

Using these values, we can calculate:

P(X = 97) = C(100, 97) * 0.90^97 * 0.10^3

= 100 * (0.90)^97 * (0.10)^3

≈ 0.0975

So, the probability that exactly 97 out of 100 randomly sampled American adults had chickenpox during childhood is approximately 0.0975 or 9.75%.

(c) The probability that exactly 3 out of a new sample of 100 American adults have not had chickenpox in their childhood can be calculated using the binomial probability formula:

P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1-p)^(n-k)

Where:

P(X = k) is the probability of getting exactly k successes (3 in this case)

C(n, k) is the number of ways to choose k successes out of n trials (100 in this case)

p is the probability of success (probability of not having chickenpox = 0.10)

n is the total number of trials (100 in this case)

Using these values, we can calculate:

P(X = 3) = C(100, 3) * 0.10^3 * 0.90^97

= 161,700 * (0.10)^3 * (0.90)^97

≈ 0.0315

So, the probability that exactly 3 out of a new sample of 100 American adults have not had chickenpox in their childhood is approximately 0.0315 or 3.15%.

(d) To calculate the probability that at least 1 out of 10 randomly sampled American adults have had chickenpox, we can use the complement rule: P(at least 1) = 1 - P(none)

Where P(none) is the probability of none of the 10 sampled adults having chickenpox.

Using the binomial formula:

P(X = 0) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1-p)^(n-k)

Where:

P(X = 0) is the probability of getting exactly 0 successes

C(n, k) is the number of ways to choose 0 successes out of n trials (10 in this case)

p is the probability of success (probability of having chickenpox = 0.90)

n is the total number of trials (10 in this case)

Using these values, we can calculate:

P(X = 0) = C(10, 0) * 0.90^0 * 0.10^10

= 1 * (0.90)^0 * (0.10)^10

≈ 0.3487

So, P(none) ≈ 0.3487

Therefore, P(at least 1) = 1 - P(none) = 1 - 0.3487 = 0.6513

So, the probability that at least 1 out of 10 randomly sampled American adults have had chickenpox is approximately 0.6513 or 65.13%.

(e) To calculate the probability that at most 3 out of 10 randomly sampled American adults have not had chickenpox, we can add up the probabilities of getting 0, 1, 2, and 3 successes:

P(X ≤ 3) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + P(X = 2) + P(X = 3)

We can use the binomial probability formula to calculate each individual probability:

P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1-p)^(n-k)

Where:

P(X = k) is the probability of getting exactly k successes (0, 1, 2, or 3 in this case)

C(n, k) is the number of ways to choose k successes out of n trials (10 in this case)

p is the probability of success (probability of not having chickenpox = 0.10)

n is the total number of trials (10 in this case)

Using these values, we can calculate each individual probability:

P(X = 0) = C(10, 0) * 0.10^0 * 0.90^10

P(X = 1) = C(10, 1) * 0.10^1 * 0.90^9

P(X = 2) = C(10, 2) * 0.10^2 * 0.90^8

P(X = 3) = C(10, 3) * 0.10^3 * 0.90^7

Adding up these probabilities, we get:

P(X ≤ 3) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + P(X = 2) + P(X = 3)

≈ 0.9873

So, the probability that at most 3 out of 10 randomly sampled American adults have not had chickenpox is approximately 0.9873 or 98.73%.

Adding together the whole number parts gives us 21. When we add the fractions, we get 25/15, which simplifies to 1 10/15. Adding this to our whole number sum gives us 22 10/15, or 22 2/3.

To find the sum of these mixed numbers, you'll want to first add the whole number parts, and then add the fractions. In this case, adding together the whole numbers 7, 5, and 9 gives us 21.

The fractions 2/15, 2/3, and 13/15 can be added together by finding a common denominator. The common denominator for 15 and 3 is 15, therefore 2/3 becomes 10/15 when it is converted.

When we add 2/15, 10/15, and 13/15, we get 25/15, which can be reduced to 1 10/15.

When we add this to our whole number sum, we get 22 10/15,

which simplifies to 22 2/3.

https://brainly.com/question/11279314

#SPJ2

Answer:

0.4 liters of sugar.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello, I think I can help you with this

you can easily solve this by using a rule of three

Step 1

if

5 liters flour⇒  1 liter sugar

2 liters flour⇒ x?liter sugar

do the relation

[tex]\frac{5\ liters\ flour}{1\ liter\ sugar}=\frac{2\ liters\ flour}{x}\\\\solve\ for\ x\\\\\\\frac{x*5\ liters\ flour}{1\ liter\ sugar}=2\ liters\ flour\\x=\frac{2\ liters\ flour*1\ liter\ sugar}{5\ liters\ flour} \\x=\frac{2}{5}liter\ sugar\\x=0.4\ liters\ of\ sugar\\[/tex]

0.4 liters of sugar

I hope it helps, Have a great day-

Hypothesis 1 supported (potentially adapted wings), 2 needs more data, 3 and 4 not supported (scavengers and traffic constant).

Here's how to proceed:

1. Match Data to Hypotheses:

Hypothesis 1:

Relevant Data: "The wing shapes of swallows killed on roads differ from those of the general population."

Hypothesis 2:

Relevant Data: Not directly provided in the given options. More information is needed about the actual population size of cliff swallows living near roads over time.

Hypothesis 3:

Relevant Data: "Avian scavengers did not increase during this time, and terrestrial scavengers probably did not increase."

Hypothesis 4:

Relevant Data: "Car traffic stayed the same or increased during this time."

2. Evaluate Hypothesis Support:

Hypothesis 1:

Supported (additional data may be needed). The wing shape difference suggests potential adaptation, but more evidence would strengthen the conclusion.

Hypothesis 2:

Cannot be determined without direct data on population size changes.

Hypothesis 3:

Not supported (probably not a factor). The data indicates scavenger populations haven't increased, suggesting they aren't significantly affecting the number of road-killed swallows found.

Hypothesis 4:

Not supported (probably not a factor). The data shows car traffic has remained steady or increased, making it less likely to be the cause of a decrease in observed road-killed swallows.

Complete Question:

Answer:

experiment

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct option is A. 8

Given f (x)=1/4 (2)^x.

[tex]f(x)[/tex] [tex]=\frac{1}{4} 2^{x}[/tex]

We have to calculate F(5), means put x = 5.

So, [tex]f(5)=\frac{1}{4} 2^{5}[/tex]

[tex]f(5)=\frac{1}{4} \times 32[/tex]

[tex]f(5)=8[/tex]

Hence [tex]f(5)=8[/tex] .

For more details on function of x follow the link:

https://brainly.com/question/17014384

Answer:

1.3 times

Step-by-step explanation:

Jean is 12 years old. Joan is 24 years old, and Jane is 20 years old. Four years ago, Joan was 20 and Jane was 16.

Let's denote:

- Joan's current age as J

- Jane's current age as N

- Jean's current age as I

Given:

1. Jean is 12 years younger than Joan: I = J - 12

2. Joan is twice as old as Jean: J = 2I

3. Four years ago, Joan was the same age as Jane is now: J - 4 = N

4. Jane was twice as old as her niece four years ago: N - 4 = 2(I - 4)

Using equation (1) and (2):

J = 2(J - 12)

J = 2J - 24

J = 24

Now substituting J = 24 into equation (1):

I = 24 - 12

I = 12

So, Jean is currently 12 years old.

The expression for the number of quarters Peter has in terms of the number of dimes is [tex]\( \frac{3}{4}d \)[/tex].

Let's denote the number of dimes Peter has as [tex]\( d \)[/tex]. According to the problem, Peter has three times as many quarters as dimes. Therefore, if we let [tex]\( q \)[/tex] represent the number of quarters, we can write the relationship between the number of quarters and dimes as:

[tex]\[ q = 3d \][/tex]

However, the question asks for an expression that gives the number of quarters in terms of the number of dimes, but using the same variable [tex]\( d \)[/tex]  to represent the total value of the dimes in dollars. Since each dime is worth $0.10, the total value of the dimes in dollars is:

[tex]\[ \text{Total value of dimes} = 0.10d \][/tex]

To find the number of quarters in terms of the total value of the dimes in dollars, we need to divide the total value of the dimes by the value of one quarter, which is $0.25, and then multiply by 3 because there are three times as many quarters as dimes:

[tex]\[ q = \frac{0.10d}{0.25} \times 3 \][/tex]

Simplifying the fraction [tex]\( \frac{0.10}{0.25} \)[/tex] gives us [tex]\( \frac{1}{2.5} \)[/tex], which simplifies further to [tex]\( \frac{2}{5} \)[/tex]. Therefore:

[tex]\[ q = \frac{2}{5}d \times 3 \][/tex]

[tex]\[ q = \frac{3}{5} \times 2d \][/tex]

[tex]\[ q = \frac{3}{5} \times 2 \times \frac{d}{1} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ q = \frac{3}{5} \times \frac{2d}{1} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ q = \frac{3}{5} \times d \times 2 \][/tex]

[tex]\[ q = \frac{3}{5} \times d \times \frac{2}{1} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ q = \frac{3}{5} \times \frac{2d}{1} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ q = \frac{3 \times 2d}{5} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ q = \frac{6d}{5} \][/tex]

However, we must remember that the original relationship was [tex]\( q = 3d \)[/tex], not . This means we made a mistake in our calculation. Let's correct it:

[tex]\[ q = 3d \][/tex]

Since each quarter is worth $0.25, the total value of the quarters in dollars is:

[tex]\[ \text{Total value of quarters} = 0.25q \][/tex]

[tex]\[ \text{Total value of quarters} = 0.25 \times 3d \][/tex]

[tex]\[ \text{Total value of quarters} = 0.75d \][/tex]

Now, to express the number of quarters [tex]\( q \)[/tex] in terms of the total value of the dimes in dollars using the same variable [tex]\( d \)[/tex], we need to adjust our equation to account for the value difference between dimes and quarters. Since the value of the dimes is given in dollars as [tex]\( d \)[/tex], and each quarter is worth $0.25, we can express the number of quarters as:

[tex]\[ q = \frac{d}{0.25} \times 3 \][/tex]

[tex]\[ q = \frac{d}{\frac{1}{4}} \times 3 \][/tex]

[tex]\[ q = d \times 4 \times 3 \][/tex]

[tex]\[ q = 4d \times 3 \][/tex]

[tex]\[ q = 12d \][/tex]

But this is not the expression we are looking for, as it gives us the number of quarters in terms of the total value of the dimes in dollars, not in terms of the number of dimes. We need to divide by 10 to convert the total value of the dimes in dollars back to the number of dimes:

[tex]\[ q = \frac{12d}{10} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ q = \frac{3}{4}d \times 4 \][/tex]

[tex]\[ q = 3d \][/tex]

This is the correct expression, as it gives us the number of quarters in terms of the number of dimes, with [tex]\( d \)[/tex] representing the number of dimes, not their value in dollars.

To find two points with negative slopes, we can calculate the slopes of the lines passing through the point (2, 8) and each of the given points. The pairs of points with negative slopes are (-2, -6) and (1, -3).

A line has a negative slope when it goes down from left to right. To find two points with negative slopes, we can calculate the slopes of the lines passing through the point (2, 8) and each of the given points.

Using the slope formula, slope = ∆y / ∆x, we can calculate the slopes:

-2, -6: slope = (-6 - 8) / (-2 - 2) = -14 / -4 = 3.5

1, -3: slope = (-3 - 8) / (1 - 2) = -11 / -1 = 11

Therefore, the pairs of points with negative slopes are (-2, -6) and (1, -3).

Answer:

8.25y-14

Step-by-step explanation:

The given expression is [tex]4(1.75y-3.5)+1.25y[/tex]

Distribute 4 over the parenthesis

[tex]4\cdot1.75y+4\cdot(-3.5)+1.25y\\\\=7y-14+1.25y[/tex]

Now. group the like terms

[tex](7y+1.25y)-14[/tex]

Finally combine the like terms

[tex]8.25y-14[/tex]

Therefore, the simplified expression is 8.25y-14

quotient is divide

-20/4 = -5

-5 -3 = -8

Answer:

y=log4 64=2.6665.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that logarithmic expression

y=log 464

By using logarithmic rules

Substitute the decimal point after end digit and then put zero after decimal point

We can write as

y=log464.0

To put the decimal point after one digit from left then we move two steps.Therefore ,we write 2 on left side of the decimal point in final result

Now, we see the value of 46 at 4 from log table then we get the value of 46 at 4 is 6665

Therefore , y=log464=2.6665

Hence, the value of y=2.6665

The value of y to the equation log₄(64) = y is y = 3.

The given logarithmic equation is :

y = log₄(64)

This can be written in exponential form as :

4^(y) = 64

It is known that :

4 × 4 × 4 = 64

So,

4³ = 64

Hence the value of y = 3.

Learn more about Logarithmic Functions here :

https://brainly.com/question/30339782

#SPJ6

To write the equation in point-slope form, we can use the formula y - y1 = m(x - x1), where (x1, y1) is a point on the line and m is the slope.

To write an equation in point-slope form, we can use the formula y - y1 = m(x - x1), where (x1, y1) is a point on the line and m is the slope. In this case, the given point is (-8, -2) and the slope is 5. Plugging in these values into the formula, we get:

y - (-2) = 5(x - (-8))

Simplifying the equation, we get:

y + 2 = 5(x + 8)

Therefore, the equation in point-slope form of the line that passes through the point (-8, -2) with a slope of 5 is y + 2 = 5(x + 8).