Which verb is the correct choice for this sentence?

We ____________ in the choir tomorrow afternoon at the charity event.
A) sing
B) sang
C) did sing
D) are singing

The answer which correctly analyzes each word’s part of speech in the sentence given is this:

During (prep), that (demonstrative adj), epidemic (n), early (adj), warnings (n), circulated (v), widely (adv).

During = indicates the preposition of time

That = modifies the noun epidemic

Early = modifies the noun warnings

Circulated = functions as an action word

Widely = modifies the verb circulated

Answer:

the answer is A.

Explanation:

Final answer:

The next likely event in the story is that the characters will delve deeper into understanding the creature extracted from Effie's eye, as indicated by the doctor's and professor's scientific curiosity and discussion.

Explanation:

Based on the excerpt, it is most likely that the characters will find out more about the creature. The narrative highlights the doctor's curiosity and the involvement of the professor, leading to a scientific interest in the specimen found in Effie's eye. The excitement and quarrel between the doctor and professor over classification indicate a keen interest in further exploration of this new discovery.

Based on the story, the characters will most likely find out more about the creature. The doctor finds the creature very interesting and calls the professor to examine it. The correct option is C.

It is less likely that Daddy will continue to collect new specimens. The story focuses on the examination of the single creature that Effie found in her eye. There is no mention of Daddy looking for more creatures.

Effie does not become more and more afraid. While she is initially in pain, she seems more curious than scared about the creature. She asks her father what it is and takes care of it inside her eye. They argue about the name and family of the creature, which suggests that they are trying to identify it and learn more about it.

The professor and Daddy will likely continue to quarrel. They are already happily arguing about the creature, and this suggests that they enjoy intellectual debate.

The complete question is:

Part 1

It all began with Effie's getting something in her eye. It hurt very much indeed, and it felt something like a red-hot spark—only it seemed to have legs as well, and wings like a fly. Effie rubbed and cried—not real crying, but the kind your eye does all by itself without your being miserable inside your mind—and then she went to her father to have the thing in her eye taken out. Effie's father was a doctor, so of course he knew how to take things out of eyes.

When he had gotten the thing out, he said: "This is very curious." Effie had often got things in her eye before, and her father had always seemed to think it was natural—rather tiresome and naughty perhaps, but still natural. He had never before thought it curious.

Effie stood holding her handkerchief to her eye, and said: "I don't believe it's out." People always say this when they have had something in their eyes.

"Oh, yes—it's out," said the doctor. "Here it is, on the brush. This is very interesting."

Effie had never heard her father say that about anything that she had any share in. She said: "What?"

The doctor carried the brush very carefully across the room, and held the point of it under his microscope—then he twisted the brass screws of the microscope, and looked through the top with one eye.

"Dear me," he said. "Dear, dear me! Four well-developed limbs; a long caudal appendage; five toes, unequal in lengths, almost like one of the Lacertidae, yet there are traces of wings." The creature under his eye wriggled a little in the castor oil, and he went on: "Yes; a bat-like wing. A new specimen, undoubtedly. Effie, run round to the professor and ask him to be kind enough to step in for a few minutes."

"You might give me sixpence, Daddy," said Effie, "because I did bring you the new specimen. I took great care of it inside my eye, and my eye does hurt."

The doctor was so pleased with the new specimen that he gave Effie a shilling, and presently the professor stepped round. He stayed to lunch, and he and the doctor quarreled very happily all the afternoon about the name and the family of the thing that had come out of Effie's eye.

Based on the story, what will most likely happen next?

A. Daddy will continue to collect new specimens.

B. Effie will become more and more afraid.

C. The characters will find out more about the creature.

D. The professor and Daddy will continue to quarrel.

Final answer:

In Romeo and Juliet, an example of anagnorisis is when Juliet wakes to find Romeo dead, leading her to realize the tragic outcome of their actions and take her own life. This moment embodies the tragic realization and understanding that defines anagnorisis in classical tragedy.

Explanation:

An example of anagnorisis in Romeo and Juliet occurs towards the end of the play when Juliet wakes to find Romeo dead by her side. This moment of realization comes too late, as she discovers the tragic outcome of their secret plans and their attempts to overcome the feud between their families.

The recognition of her situation and the irreversible consequences of their actions lead her to take her own life.

The concept of anagnorisis reflects a critical turning point in classical tragedy, where the protagonist comes to an important understanding or recognition about their tragic flaw (hamartia) or the true nature of their circumstances, often leading to the climax or resolution of the drama.

In Romeo and Juliet, both lovers' realizations come tragically too late, symbolizing a powerful commentary on haste, miscommunication, and the devastating effects of feuding families.

It was Proteus :)))))))))))))

Answer:

The answer is A. It's too bad it's raining; I wanted to go for a swim.

Explanation:

In the multiple choices offered as possible answers, the words that are written differently are it's too bad it's raining; I wanted to go for a swim. Option A is the correct answer because it's is a contraction of it is, both times it appears in the sentence; the first too must be writen with two o's because it expresses an amount and the second to is only written with one o because it is a preposition before a verb.

The things that readers learn about G. approach to doing business based on reading this article Adaptability and flexibility:

G. business strategy is centered on responding to the shifting demands of the market and its consumers. According to the paper, G.Workspace was created in response to the COVID-19 pandemic's growing demand for remote work solutions.

G. is a fantastic tech business and a leader in the field. All it takes to keep ahead of the competition is to have workers that take pleasure in what they do. A company's ability to make any kind of financial investment is surpassed by a comfortable workplace.

Learn more about business  at

https://brainly.com/question/18307610

#SPJ3

Answer:

They join verbs that are of equal importance.  

Explanation:

Coordinating conjunctions and, but, for, nor, or, so, and yet join words, sentences and clauses. Therefore, they can connect two o more items in a list. For instance:

I like coffee and tea.

I like coffee, tea and wine.

Besides, they provide a balanced emphasis to two main clauses. For example:

While I was out, the children painted my room and cleaned the house.

Dante employed an indirect approach in the Divine Comedy to support Christian values and critique the Church, consistent with late medieval theological expression and avoiding direct conflict with ecclesiastical authorities.

Dante likely chose to write his views on Christianity in an indirect manner when he wrote the Divine Comedy because he wanted to show his support for Christian values while also critiquing the current state of the Church. This indirect approach was common in the late medieval period, where devotional writings often leaned towards mysticism, and many writers expressed their religious fervor through visions and symbolic interpretations. Following the trends of the time, Dante conveyed complex theological and moral ideas through a narrative that was imaginative and engaging, thereby reaching a broader audience, including individuals who may not have been literate but could appreciate the story as a form of moral instruction.

Works like Domenico di Michelino's 'Dante and the Divine Comedy' demonstrate how artists and writers of the period used creative means to express religious themes. For example, Michelangelo in his later years depicted himself in his artwork as deeply concerned with the fate of his soul, highlighting the intersection of art, personal piety, and theological reflection. Similarly, Dante's Divine Comedy subtly navigates the reader through a spiritual journey that reflects his critiques and beliefs without directly engaging in conflict with ecclesiastical authorities.

Dante likely used an indirect approach in the 'Divine Comedy' to posit a positive representation of Christianity while critiquing the Church, aligning with the era's appreciation for allegory and mysticism in devotional writing, and catering to an elite, literate audience.

Dante likely chose to write his views on Christianity indirectly in the Divine Comedy because he wanted to represent Christianity in a positive light but felt the state of the Church was too negative. By setting his narrative in an allegorical fantasy journey through Hell, Purgatory, and Heaven, Dante was able to critique the Church and its leaders without direct confrontation which could have been dangerous given the political and religious climate of the time. Moreover, the era's trend towards mysticism in devotional writing, the precedent of imperial patronage influencing art, and the commonality of illiteracy which made visual and allegorical depictions of Christianity more accessible, all suggest that Dante's strategy was well-suited to his time and audience.

Additionally, considering the intricate use of language and the fact that reading and writing were reserved for the elite, Dante's approach also may have been a sophisticated literary method to engage readers capable of discerning the deeper moral and theological themes within his entertaining narrative.

Answer: C) Gulliver encounters an architect who builds houses from the top down.

Explanation: something objective is a person or their judgement that are not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts. From the given options, the one that represents an objective summary of the given passage from "Gulliver's Travels" is the corresponding to option C, because the other ones use words like "silly," "ridiculous," and "crazy" which express opinions.

Answer:

ok

Explanation:

He said the king had aboished our most valuable laws, refused his assent, closed colonial legislatures and we could do no laws and that the government was instituted among men. Completing these lines he described the King´s actions like: usurpation, abuse and despotism.

The correct answer is actually A. Toe dancing was developed in the early nineteenth century, but it was not widely used until the 1830s.

A comma splice incorrectly connects two independent clauses - where there should be a conjunction, a comma is incorrectly placed, like in the example above.

B is incorrect because the only thing that changed was that the comma was deleted - it didn't actually fix anything; C is incorrect because the subject is missing after yet - it should be: ...yet IT was not widely used... D is incorrect because there should be a semicolon (;) in front of however and not a comma.

The rhetorical appeal used in the provided sentence is ethos, focusing on establishing the speaker's credibility by mentioning authoritative sources.

The type of rhetoric used in the sentence, To make sure my numbers were correct, I consulted three peer-reviewed journals and a professor at Harvard who has a PhD on the topic, is ethos. This rhetorical appeal centers on the author's credibility or trustworthiness. By mentioning peer-reviewed journals and a Harvard professor with a PhD, the speaker is attempting to establish credibility and demonstrate that his information or argument comes from reputable and authoritative sources, which are aspects of extrinsic ethos. This approach to persuasion aligns with Aristotle's rhetorical proofs, where ethos involves convincing the audience of the speaker's credibility through competence, trustworthiness, and dynamism.