Why did the state delegates meet in 1787?

Answer:

God's covenant with Israel was that he was going to make a big nation. And it would be more than stars that Abraham could count.

Explanation:

In Israelite belief, the covenant with Abraham promised his descendants a prosperous land and a great nation in exchange for worship and moral righteousness. This agreement involved the rite of circumcision and established their special relationship with God, serving as a precursor to the Sinai Covenant and the universal application of divine law.

God's Covenant with Abraham

According to Israelite belief, God's covenant with Abraham is a foundational aspect of Jewish faith. This covenant was a promise from God that in return for their devotion and the circumcision of all Hebrew males, God would bestow upon Abraham's descendants a prosperous land, known as a 'land of milk and honey'. This promise also indicated that Abraham would be the father of a great nation, and his name would be honored. This agreement further extended to a moral obligation where the Hebrews would foster justice and righteousness, setting an initial foundation for the Israelites and later widening to all humanity.

The renewal of this covenant 14 years later affirmed that Abraham's descendants would possess the land of Canaan perpetually, changing his name from Abram to Abraham, signifying 'father of a multitude'. It instituted the practice of circumcision as a sign of the covenant among non-kin members of the household, highlighting that national identity in Israel was not based solely on ethnicity. This everlasting agreement was marked by faith in one supreme deity, Yahweh, and set the stage for further covenants, notably the Sinai Covenant made with the Israelites through Moses at Mt. Sinai.

The broader scope of this covenant is seen as not only a relationship between God and the Israelites but as a cornerstone for the development of monotheistic traditions and a universal application of God's laws, eventually intended to encompass all nations.

In the early days of Church it was a common practice for Church to meet and sit together at homes in small congregations, where they would eat and converse as it is stated in Acts 2:46 
And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart.” which in modern times has changed to reserve attitudes and the congregations only meet at some special or reserved occasions. Another thing which has changed is the usage of wealth which was for the wellbeing of poor and needy as said in 2 Corinthians 9:7...
"Each of you should give what you have decided in your heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver."
The practice no more exists in its true meanings.

Final answer:

The Union's capture of New Orleans significantly weakened the Confederacy by disrupting its economy and cotton exports, and allowing the Union to control a critical part of the Mississippi River, contributing to the Confederacy's isolation.

Explanation:

The Union's capture of New Orleans in the spring and summer of 1862 severely hurt the Confederacy by cutting off a major economic resource and disrupting the southern export of cotton. It was a significant blow due to New Orleans being the most important port in the Confederacy. The access to the Mississippi River was critical for the transport and export of goods, particularly cotton, which was a staple of the Southern economy.

The capture of New Orleans had far-reaching effects, particularly as it was followed by further Union successes such as the capture of Vicksburg and the Union's control over the Mississippi River. These victories were not only tactical but also struck a blow to the morale and economic stability of the Confederacy, which was already struggling with infrastructure and resource limitations compared to the North.

Answer:

They started the stamp act riot and forming a mob in front of Governor Thomas Hutchinson’s house. Demanding that he wrote the letter to England to repeal the act.

Explanation:

The Stamp Act of 1765 was an act of the Parliament of Great Britain that imposed a direct tax on the colonies in North America and required that the printed materials in there should be produced in London.

The Sons of Liberty were a secret organization created by the thirteen American colonies to fight taxation by the British Government. They did the job so effectively that the tax was never collected. After achieving that the group disbanded.

I hope this answer helps you.

The correct answer is A) More and more land was cleared for farming during this time.

Significant population growth on the Great Plains between 1880 and 1930 resulted of more land was cleared for farming during this time.

In the early 1800s, just a few people lived on the Great Plains because they considered that the land was dry and for that reason, was not good for farming. People started to arrive at the Great Plains in 1862 when the Homestead Act was passed. The government sold 160 acres of land for a very cheap price. The condition was for farmers to farm the land for five years. This way they could own the land. So the new settlers learned how to farm on the Great Plains because the soil had grassroots and this presented serious difficulties for farming. As time went by, people from the East moved to the West as land was clearing for farming and all the opportunities that this created.

Answer:

a

Explanation:

got it right

England was concerned about French settlements in the Ohio and Mississippi valleys due to the threat they posed to expansion and economic interests. This led to the French and Indian War and subsequent British decisions that limited colonists' westward ambitions, fueling tensions between the colonists and Britain.

England was concerned about the presence of French settlements in the valleys of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers for several strategic and economic reasons. The English colonists had ambitions to expand into the fertile Ohio River Valley, which was seen as critical for agricultural growth and westward expansion. The presence of the French posed a direct challenge to these aspirations, leading to conflicts such as the French and Indian War. Moreover, after Britain's victory over France, the need to maintain peaceful relations with the Native American tribes limited the immediate settlement opportunities for the colonists, creating tensions with the British government.

These tensions were further compounded by issues such as the return of Loyalist property and control over the vital Mississippi River, which was essential for trade and settlement in the west. The British government's decisions, including the prohibition of settlement west of the Appalachians, often clashed with the colonists' expectations, leading to increasing dissatisfaction that contributed to the growing disharmony in American-British relations and set the stage for future conflicts.

The place where two populations are living together and they have their own rules, power and government, this is known as the Middle grounds. The middle grounds by with the Atlantic seaboard had to rearrange or to find the group that is controlled by the Europeans. In nineteenth century, the middle grounds are abolished and this make the place for the Europeans in which Indian were cold-heartedly troubled.

Inequalities in land ownership contributes to the racial tensions during the reconstruction because of during this period, opinions were given in various and different ways towards the slaves in their time as they focus more and direct their attention to land owners than slaves, as this shows that they favor land owners than slaves, causing inequality among the society.

The similarities between the SCLC and the SNCC are:

The differences are:
SNCC wanted more strategies that were confrontational, SCLC did not. SCLC was comprised mostly of church folk, SNCC was made up of mainly the poor.

The full meaning of SNCC is  - Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee.

The full meaning of SCLC is  - South Christian Leadership Conference.

See the link below for more about SNCC and SCLC:

https://brainly.com/question/3080855

Martin Luther King Jr. masterfully used work, speeches, songs, and the Bible in his speeches to deeply resonate with diverse audiences, drawing on shared cultural and spiritual resources to promote the civil rights movement. His skillful use of prophetic rhetoric and emotional appeal helped galvanize support and advance the cause of racial equality, leaving a lasting legacy as one of history's greatest public speakers.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. strategically used work, speeches, songs, and the Bible in his speeches to connect deeply with his audience, drawing on shared cultural, spiritual, and intellectual resources to advocate for civil rights. By referencing the Bible, King invoked the moral authority and prophetic tradition central to his audience's values, emphasizing the struggle for justice as a divine mandate. His speeches often highlighted the systemic inequalities and injustices faced by African Americans, drawing parallels with historical and biblical narratives of oppression and liberation. King's use of freedom songs and poetry, deeply rooted in African American spiritual and oral traditions, further united and mobilized the civil rights movement, grounding their collective action in a shared quest for dignity, respect, and equality.

The power of King's oratory lay in his ability to weave together logical argumentation with emotional appeal, encouraging empathy and identification with the civil rights cause. Through his speeches, King not only presented a compelling case for racial equality but also inspired hope and courage among supporters, utilizing the transformative power of words to challenge and change societal norms. His reference to contemporaneous issues, such as the unfair treatment of African Americans in various spheres of life, served as a call to action, highlighting the urgent need for legislative and societal changes.

In summary, King's rhetorical choices were deeply intentional, leveraging the cultural, spiritual, and emotional resonance of his references to galvanize support and effect change. His legacy as a speaker is marked by his skillful integration of diverse elements into a coherent and persuasive vision for a more just and equitable society.

The Declaration of Independence asserts government legitimacy from "the consent of the governed." The Articles of Confederation establish decentralized governance, requiring collective state consent.

The principle of popular sovereignty, the idea that the authority of the government is derived from the consent of the governed, is evident in both the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation.

In the Declaration of Independence, the document begins with the assertion that "Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." This emphasizes that the legitimacy of government stems from the people it governs.

The Declaration then goes on to list grievances against King George III, highlighting the colonists' belief that their rights were being violated without their consent, thus justifying their rebellion.

Similarly, the Articles of Confederation reflect popular sovereignty by establishing a decentralized system of government in which states retained significant autonomy. Each state had equal representation in the Congress, reflecting the idea of equal participation and consent of all states.

Additionally, major decisions required the consent of nine out of the thirteen states, further emphasizing the principle of popular sovereignty through collective agreement.

Overall, both documents underscore the foundational principle that governmental authority should derive from and be accountable to the people it governs, exemplifying the essence of popular sovereignty.

Portugal did not take the lead in developing and testing innovative sailing technology in the 1400s.

Portuguese exploration in the 15th and 16th centuries was driven by advances in sailing technology, including the caravel ship design, the astrolabe for navigation, and improved mapmaking. This enabled Portuguese explorers like Vasco da Gama and Ferdinand Magellan to chart new routes and explore distant lands.

While Portugal did play a significant role in maritime exploration during the 1400s, it did not take the lead in developing and testing innovative sailing technology. The advancements in sailing technology were actually a result of adopting new non-Western maritime technologies from Arab sailors in the Middle East, such as the lateen sail and the sternpost rudder. Portugal's innovation was more focused on exploration and establishing trade routes.

https://brainly.com/question/750641

#SPJ12

The end of Reconstruction after the American Civil War is attributed to both the South and the North. Southern 'Redeemers' used methods to regain power and suppress freed African Americans' rights. Conversely, Northern commitment to protect these rights waned due to political fatigue and a re-focus on economic development.

The Reconstruction era, following the American Civil War, was a period of reintegration for the Southern states back into the Union. The question refers to the DBQ (Document Based Questions) about who from the North or the South killed the Reconstruction era. There's a considerable debate over this with historians attributing the end of Reconstruction to both southern white resistance and northern neglect.

Many historians argue that the Southern 'Redeemers' played a significant role given them the name 'South Killed Reconstruction'. These were southern whites who used both political and violent means to regain power and effectively suppress the rights of freed African Americans.

However, a counter viewpoint suggests that the North bears responsibility, being termed as 'North Killed Reconstruction'. The argument here is that the Northerners gradually retreated from their commitment to protect African American rights due to fatigue over the political fight against the South and a shifting focus to economic development.

https://brainly.com/question/34697345

#SPJ6

The 2000 elections are notable for resulting in a presidency where the winner, George W. Bush, received fewer popular votes but won through the Electoral College. Furthermore, the Supreme Court's involvement in a disputed Florida vote recount marked it as one of the 'disputed elections' and raised significant questions about the U.S. electoral process.

A significant outcome of the 2000 elections is that it illustrated the complexities and potential pitfalls of the U.S. electoral system. During this election, the winner, George W. Bush, received fewer popular votes than his opponent, Al Gore, but prevailed with a majority in the Electoral College, highlighting one of the critical aspects of this indirect voting system. The election outcome was ultimately decided by the Supreme Court's intervention in the vote recount in Florida, which was marked by numerous disputed ballots and allegations of irregularities, particularly in counties traditionally dominated by Democrats.

This election is considered one of the five U.S. presidential elections where the winner lost the popular vote but won the Electoral College. It is also counted among the six 'disputed elections' in U.S. history, raising questions about the political process and the meaning of democratic elections. The close outcome and subsequent legal challenges demonstrate the concept of rational abstention, where voters may feel their votes do not count in a predominantly.

Answer:

oligarchy

Explanation:

In an oligarchy it is often the wealthy that govern the society, in this case it´d be better to have an oligarchy since they can actually fund and give money to help the country in this case the city that´s under attack and they would do it with no problems since they are directly part of the government.

Answer:

A) To give up all claims to Cuba

C) To sell the Philippines to the US

D) To give Guam to the US

Explanation:

on edg2020