Why was the Three-Fifths Compromise necessary?

The attack on Pearl Harbor lasted just under two hours on December 7, 1941. It resulted in significant loss of life and damage to the US Pacific Fleet, but failed in its strategic goal of crippling the US fleet due to the absence of American aircraft carriers.

The attack on Pearl Harbor occurred on the morning of December 7, 1941, and lasted just under two hours. The surprise assault was executed by the Japanese navy using over 350 planes from six aircraft carriers. This meticulously planned operation decimated the US Pacific Fleet, with 21 ships damaged or sunk, including eight battleships, and resulted in the destruction of 188 US aircraft, with another 150 damaged. The human cost was significant, with 2,403 Americans killed and 1,178 wounded. Among these, nearly half of the fatalities were aboard the USS Arizona. The Japanese, on the other hand, suffered minimal losses.

Although the attack was a tactical success for Japan, it failed to achieve a strategic victory by missing its primary target, the American aircraft carriers, which were not present in the harbor at the time. This event led President Franklin Roosevelt to refer to December 7 as a "date which will live in infamy," as he declared war on Japan the following day, propelling the United States into World War II.

B. Rhode Island practiced religious toleration while Massachusetts Bay Colony did not.

Roger Williams (1603-1683) firmly believed in freedom of conscience. He founded the Rhode Island colony after being banished from Massachusetts in 1636 because of his views. He advocated keeping church and state separate. Rhode Island became a safe place for various religious dissenters and minorities to find a place to exist peacefully -- Baptists, Quakers, Jews and other religious minorities. Years later, when colonial America became the United States of America and the US Constitution was being written, Roger Williams idea of maintaining a “wall of separation” between church and state influenced the framers of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Freedom of religion was not the case in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, dominated by Puritan law. The Puritans came to America so they could practice their religion, but did not allow freedom for others within their colony. Those who did not follow the Puritan ways were often sent away (as Roger Williams was).

The founder of Rhode Island believed in religious toleration, meanwhile, the founders of Massachusetts were Puritans and wanted strict obedience to their beliefs. Therefore, it can be concluded that the major difference between the Massachusetts Bay Colony and Rhode Island was that Rhode Island practiced the idea of religious toleration while the Massachusetts Bay Colony did not have religious toleration or freedom.

EXPLANATION:  

In 1630, eleven ships ran by John Winthrop came in New England with more than 700 Puritan settlers. They founded the Massachusetts Bay Colony and inhabited near the current area of Boston. John Winthrop worked as the new colony’s governor. He desired it to be a "city on a hill" (a Bible’s passage) which would be a model for Europeans of how Protestant society could develop.

The Puritan superiors from the Massachusetts Bay Colony had very firm rules and regulations concerning their church. People who opposed them were usually pushed to quit the colony. Some of these people developed new colonies in southern Massachusetts including Connecticut and Rhode Island.

Roger Williams, a Puritan religious leader, believed that the government must separate from the church. He also considered that people must have greater religious freedom. He was expelled from Massachusetts and established his own settlement so-called Providence in 1636.

Another Puritan leader, Anne Hutchinson, argued the Puritan leaders in Massachusetts. She said they focused on "works" for redemption and not "faith." She was exiled too and began the settlement of Portsmouth in 1638.

Portsmouth and Providence, together with two other settlements, joined together to form the British Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations in 1644.

LEARN MORE:  

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

• Which of the following best summarizes the role of religion in the Massachusetts Bay Colony? https://brainly.com/question/319151

KEYWORDS : Massachusetts Bay Colony, Rhode Island

Subject  : History

Class  : 10-12

Sub-Chapter : Puritans in Early New England

The question specifically refers to a tribe that ceded land for Oregon State University, which requires further research. However, it was federal laws like the Morrill Acts that provided the structure for land grants to establish universities like Oregon State University as affordable institutions of higher education.

Unfortunately, the information about which tribe ceded the land used to establish Oregon State University as a land-grant institution requires additional research. We can discuss, however, how the federal government used land grants to influence state actions, as highlighted by the Morrill Acts of 1862 and 1890. These acts set aside public land and federal funds to create affordable land-grant colleges useful in the professions, trade, commerce, industry, and agriculture.

Oregon State University, then Corvallis State Agricultural College, would have benefitted from these provisions. The federal government did this by donating land or by using funding from the sale of granted lands. These Land-Grant colleges were integral to expanding access to higher education and created a contrast to the private Ivy League universities catering to the elite.

https://brainly.com/question/5482447

#SPJ13

The social group in new Spain that was created through the intermixing of people with Spanish and Native American ancestry is known as the Mestizos.

The characteristics of social groups are as follows:

Mestizos is a social group that significantly bears the Spanish name but followed the cultures and traditions of Indians along with the Spanish. This social group in a very short period of time became the backbone of the Spanish empire in the American region.

Therefore, Mestizos is a social group in new Spain that was created through the intermixing of people with Spanish and Native American ancestry.

To learn more about Social groups, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/782530

#SPJ5

Chandragupta Maurya's rule emphasized military conquest and centralized bureaucratic governance, while Ashoka's rule focused on Buddhist principles, non-violence, and public welfare.

The Mauryan Empire, one of the greatest empires in ancient India, was founded by Chandragupta Maurya in 322 BCE and was later ruled by his grandson, Ashoka. Chandragupta's approach to ruling involved military conquests and centralized bureaucratic governance. He secured control over central and northern India through diplomacy and warfare, supported by the advice in Kautilya's Arthashastra, which detailed statecraft, governance, and warfare.

Frederick Douglass an African American social reformer could be credited as a supporter of the right for women to vote in election or as popularly known women suffrage beside his help on liberating the slaves. His works of writing were among the motivations of the American individuals, one of which is his diary.

Answer:

Equality for all people.

Explanation:

apex

Jefferson’s basic elements of the argument for separation were lack of respect. Furthermore, he framed the arguments in a way that shows that the violation of economic and political rights that the Colonists have had to suffer were the result of a lack of respect. Jefferson is empathizes with the British government in how they have refused to "assent" to the basic principles of dignity and decency that would eventually enable a successful relationship and partnership to develop.

Answer:

A. Many countries took decades after revolution to grant women basic rights of voting and education.

Explanation:

The claims and struggles of women for civil, political and social rights have taken place for many years and in the world. Despite several advances, the actions of the feminist movement are decisive for the achievement of better conditions and gender equality.

The history of the feminist movement had its first great moment motivated by the claims for democratic rights like the right to vote, divorce, education and work in the late nineteenth century. Even with women making a revolution and fighting tirelessly for rights, many countries took decades after the revolution to guarantee women basic voting rights and education.

Out of the choices provided above, it can be concluded to state that the factory work was one of the most important pull factors for new immigrants in the 1800s. Therefore, the option C holds true.

The immigration rate of people from rural to urban areas of the society was largely due to higher levels of industrialization in the American society in the 19th century. This gave the people from rural societies better life and income opportunities.

The number of factories in the urban societies increased rapidly during the period of industrialization, and as a result, the demand for factory workers increased significantly, which led to be sought as an important pull factor for the immigration during the 19th century.

Therefore, the option C holds true and states regarding the significance of immigration during the 19th century.

Learn more about 19th century immigration here:

https://brainly.com/question/27750258

#SPJ2

In the 1800s, religious persecution drove immigrants to seek refuge in countries like the US for freedom of worship guaranteed by law.

In the 1800s, one of the most significant pull factors for new immigrants was religious persecution. Throughout this period, many immigrants were fleeing religious persecution in their home countries, particularly in Europe.

Various religious groups faced discrimination, oppression, and even violence, prompting them to seek refuge in countries like the United States, where religious freedom was guaranteed by law.

This freedom was enshrined in the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protected individuals' rights to practice their religion without interference from the government.

Immigrants were drawn to the promise of being able to worship freely and openly without fear of persecution or discrimination. This pull factor was particularly potent for groups like the Irish Catholics, Jews, and various Protestant denominations who faced persecution in their homelands.

While factory work and farm work were also significant pull factors for immigrants during this time, religious persecution stood out as a compelling force that drove many to seek a new life in America.

The promise of religious freedom provided hope for a better future and the opportunity to practice one's faith without constraint.

Answer:

Battle of Bloody Marsh.

Explanation:

Answer:

by carrying on a violent family feud

Explanation:

Final answer:

After the Civil War, slavery ended in the South and throughout the United States due to the Thirteenth Amendment.

Explanation:

The Civil War, which took place from 1861 to 1865, was fought primarily over the issue of slavery. The Union, representing the Northern states, sought to abolish slavery, while the Confederacy, representing the Southern states, aimed to preserve it. The Union's victory in the war led to the end of slavery throughout the entire country.

Here are a few key points to consider:

In summary, after the Civil War, slavery came to an end not only in the South but also in the rest of the United States. The Emancipation Proclamation and the ratification of the 13th Amendment played crucial roles in abolishing slavery, while the Reconstruction Era aimed to secure the rights of former slaves and ensure their freedom.

Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was:

After the civil war slavery came to an end in the south and where else?

The 50-acre grant of land given to colonial settlers who paid their own way was called Headright.

Like the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise also dealt with how much representation each state would have in Congress.  Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.