Write the sentence correctly. Amelia earhart was born in Atchison Kansas, from 1897

Many scientists believe in Evolution as the common answer to the origin of life. A huge percentage of scientists claim that Evolution is a fact. However, fail to put in doubt this widespread theory and fail to achieve to find proff about the credibility of this theory. How can one know that evolution is not a fact but instead a mere theory or even a myth? The many theories evolution has itself is very complex and oftentimes incomprehensible; it does not bring peace and sastisfactory answers to an individual looking for a purpose in life but instead leaves the person with doubt and many questions which seem to have no answer. The theory of evolution is an idea which can easily be debunked by any person with wits who knows that such a theory has many controversies and that in the end can lead to no final conclusions.

Evolution is no scientific fact but instead a philosophy. However, people believe it’s a fact because of fossil remains that seem similar to modern animals. For example: In the book (Science: Preparation for the Test) states: “Scientists compare animals living today with the fossilized remains of animals that no longer exist. By doing so, they can obtain [supporting ideas] of common ancestry.” And an example of ancestry observed by scientists is found on in the same book mentioned, where it says: “Scientists have found fossilized remains of a series of animals that are relatives of today’s whales...Pakicetus... the skull represents [similarity] between the ear of a land animal and an aquatic animal”. Now, such claims are pointless and overbearing. If we look at both creatures the pakicetus has no registered fossils of evolutionary signs which can give any proven fact of its evolutionary trip from land to the sea. The book entitled: “Life... How did it come to be” has logical insight to the imperfections found in the theory of Evolution. The book mentioned states: “Why are registered fossils so important in Evolution? Gene expert G.L Stebbins said: “No biologist has seen in reality the origin of evolution. None of the great organisms has made an evolutionary change.” Today, we see no organisms who evolve through evolution.” Even Charles Darwin admitted: “The distinctions characterized in specific forms of life and the fact that they are not connected between themselves... is very obvious “. Using common logic Evolution cannot be a direct fact. But, instead it must remain only as a mere theory and in the future a possible myth.

Almost all scientists which claim to follow Darwin’s evolutionary theories have failed to provide proff of its existence and left results to experiments inconclusive. The Magazine entitled: “The origin of life” states: “Biology professor Alexandre Meinesz said in 2008 that during the past 50 years “No proff has sustained the hypothesis of a spontaneous arrival of life on Earth by means of a molecular soup and no scientific knowledge pointed towards this direction”. There is a basic law in science and that is that life cannot emerge on its own, life always comes from a pre-existing life source. However, Evolution claims that life has come from material that was unresponsive and non-existent. How can such a thing even be possible if the basic law of science is that life produces life? The magazine “The origin of life” also states: “Life comes from life. Believing that a simple live cell came to be by a casualty using [un-living] material is an act of faith”.

Evolution can be considered a hypothesis and a theory but in no way can it be considered a straight up fact, no matter how logical or convincing most scientists make it seem. It is simply not a proven fact. Nature, animals, the performance of the human body, etc is absolutely perfect. That is why that something that seems perfect in every sense possible cannot be a work of casualties. The work “Evolution or Creation” states: “Evolution is an act of faith”. Just like religion is an act of faith believing that raw materials can turn to living things is also an act of faith. Unless Evolution had photographic and physical proff of its existence there is no possible way that it can be a teachable fact.

Whenever we want to practice or belief a certain idea, thought, etc. We must first consider who founded the belief or idea and why they founded it. We must later confirm for ourselves if it’s the truth and if not discard of it immediately. Charles Darwin is considered the first to have hypothesized a theory which contradicted all the religious beliefs of there ever being a Creator. Such a critical hypothesis came to him after the death of his beloved daughter. Looking for some religious consolation Darwin was left upset and frustrated by the religious clergy of his time who affirmed that God needed another angel in heaven; by saying this they directly affirmed that God was the direct cause of his child’s death...

Hope this helps, call out for me if you need anything else sweetie :D

My best explanation will be a deep liking for something or someone. Something important to you.. sorry if it’s wrong

Orwell's purpose in writing this essay is to inform the “bad habits” of writing in politics, because of the lack of thinking their words through, and how Political writers declined the value of the English language to mislead people. This is about "Politics and the English Language" by the way

This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question.  

Read the excerpt from "Politics and the English Language" by George Orwell.

Things like the continuance of British rule in India, the Russian purges and deportations, the dropping of the atom bombs on Japan, can indeed be defended, but only by arguments which are too brutal for most people to face, and which do not square with the professed aims of political parties. Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness.

What is George Orwell's purpose in writing?

A. to inform readers of political events happening in his day

B. to inform readers of strong language used in political writing

C. to persuade readers that vague language is often used to soften harsh reality

D. to persuade readers that political speech should be softer and less specific

Answer: C. to persuade readers that vague language is often used to soften harsh reality

Explanation:

In his 1946 essay, Orwell criticizes the corruption of political language, which he claims was purposefully vague because it was meant to cover the ugly truth instead of revealing it.

Orwell understood that the use of vagueness and abstract ideas was a political tool to hide awful realities. That´s why he defended independent thinking and writing as required for truthful political development.

Not a requirement

Arrange ideas in a unconventional manners

Do not reveal the sources of information used in a paper

Make all sentences short, and begin each sentence with an adjective

Students can fresh food that would more healthier for them and the local farmers can get money in return.

Equal Opposites. North And South, East and West.

Answer:

[tex]\boxed{\bold{Opposite \ Ends \ Of \ The \ Axis}}[/tex]

Explanation:

Polar: Equal Opposites

Eg: North and South Poles

The North & South Poles are polar opposite in two ways. Geometrically, they both stand the same exact distance away from each other, but are both attached to the same axis. Polar also means glacier, or very cold, which is a similarity they both have. Polar comes from the Latin and Greek word 'polos', which means 'axis'.

tell the story of grendel's encounters with humans.

Hey I did not KNOW the answer, I just said what I thought was right. Do not judge. :)

your choses would be A

hope this helped

An outline allows a writer to categorize the main points, to organize the paragraphs into an order that makes sense, and to make sure that each paragraph/idea can be fully developed. Essentially, an outline helps prevent a writer from getting stuck when performing the actual writing of the essay.

An outline is crucial for organizing ideas and creating a coherent structure in writing. It acts as a guide for the writer and ensures that the reader can follow the essay or speech logically.

An outline is essential to writing because it serves as a road map that helps to organize thoughts and ideas effectively. Creating a preliminary or rough outline is a critical step after brainstorming, as it allows a writer to select the most compelling and relevant ideas for an essay. This process of organizing ensures that all main points are well developed before the actual writing begins.

A well-developed outline provides a clear and hierarchical breakdown of a document's parts, making the writing process smoother. It helps prevent becoming stuck during writing by laying out a clear plan of the text structure, ensuring logical progression and cohesion. Furthermore, outlines can be adjusted to individual writing styles—ranging from formal, numbered outlines for in-depth research papers to informal sketches that guide one's writing.

Outlining can also be beneficial for creating a coherent structure that assists both the writer and the reader. A structured essay or speech is easier to follow and understand, enabling readers to track the progression of ideas clearly. Therefore, regardless of one's personal writing style, an outline facilitates a more organized, effective, and ultimately successful piece of writing.

D.) Instinct is an important part of survival

The dog represents pure instinct, a trait necessary for survival in the extremely cold Yukon at this time of year.  ("But the dog knew; all its ancestry knew, and it had inherited the knowledge. ")

The man never uses instinct, which would inform him without thinking that certain actions are dangerous while others are absolutely necessary for survival. The reason the man never uses instinct is explained in this sentence: "Possibly all the generations of his ancestry had been ignorant of cold, of real cold, of cold one hundred and seven degrees below freezing-point."

The correct option is definitely D. Instinct is an important part of survival.

Final answer:

The inference from 'Did Franklin Really Collect Electric Fire from the Sky?' pertains to Benjamin Franklin's experiment demonstrating the connection between lightning and static electricity, hinting at how he saw unity in the laws of nature through electricity.

Explanation:

From the statement, "Did Franklin Really Collect Electric Fire from the Sky?" one can infer that it references Benjamin Franklin's famous experiment where he flew a kite during a thunderstorm to demonstrate the connection between lightning and static electricity. Benjamin Franklin was not only an influential politician and scientist but also played a pivotal role in the understanding of electricity. His experiment involved drawing sparks from a key tied to the kite string, which were similar to the sparks from static electricity one might experience when touching a metal doorknob after walking across a wool carpet. Franklin's findings linked these everyday occurrences to the grand scale of electrical storms, showcasing the unity of natural laws.

✯Hello✯☆(❁‿❁)☆

↪  THE ANSWER IS C

↪  During Macbeth, Malcolm and Macduff are in England talking about Macbeth. Malcolm speaks of his alliance with King of Enlgland and how they are going to invade to help the rightful king take his place

↪ HOPE THIS HELPS

★ВУёヽ(‘∀`○)ﾉВУё☆

❤Gianna❤

Answer:

Do you have a picture

Explanatio:?

Answer:

c. my heart seem to beat out of my chest

Explanation:

Onomatopoeia is the answer:)Goodluck!

Answer:

The correct answer is synecdoche.

Explanation:

Onomatopoeia is not the answer. Onomatopoeia refers to words that represent a sound by imitating it, such as bang, crash, click, buzz etc.

Synecdoche is a type of figurative language that uses a part of a whole to represent the whole. In the sentence we are analyzing here, the speaker mentions the ABC's. As we know, the ABC's refers to the alphabet. A, B, and C are the first three letters of the alphabet, which is constituted of 26 letters total. Therefore, when we say "ABC's", we are using a part - the first three letters - to refer to the whole - the complete alphabet with 26 letters. What we have is synecdoche.

C is the correct answer.

Final answer:

The best paraphrase of the given lines is that love cannot heal physical ailments or injuries, encapsulating love's emotional depth but its inability to intervene in matters of physical health.

Explanation:

The best paraphrase of the lines 'Love can not fill the thickened lung with breath, Nor clean the blood, nor set the fractured bone' from the sonnet is C) Love cannot heal someone who is sick or physically hurt. This paraphrase accurately reflects the limitations of love in the context of physical ailments, as described in the lines. The sonnet explores the idea that while love is a powerful and profound emotion, it does not have the capability to remedy physical injuries or cure illnesses.

The correct answer would be 'Principals/their'

I would say B but if I'm wrong it's D.

Hope This Helps!    Have A Nice Weekend!!

I think the answer is B.

None of the exemplified words changed while addind to them. Maybe for " nervous" an "e" was lost ( nerve-nervous)

“my reputation has been completely ruined” because it has a first point of view word “my”

The answer is B. Claim of value

There are fewer advantages to reading books online than in paper, according to a claim of value. Hence, the answer is (B).

A policyholder who needs coverage or payment for a covered loss or other policy event must make a formal claim to the insurance company. The insurer confirms the claim (or denies the claim).

In the event that it is accepted, the insurance provider will make a payment to the insured or to a recognized interested party on their behalf.

Insurance claims cover a wide range of expenses, including both normal and extensive medical examinations as well as death payments on life insurance policies.

An insured person's claims may occasionally be submitted by a third party. But most of the time, only the person(s) named on the policy is/are eligible to make a claim for benefits.

Learn more about policy claim , from :

brainly.com/question/22898077

#SPJ7

There seem to be no instructions, therefore you just have to read it.

Answer by PinkLemonadeTae:

Hi! :)

Your answer is:

The use of the phrase admiring Bog reveals the poet thinks that being well known is,

A) Unpleasant because everyone pays attention to what you do!

Have a BEAUTIFUL day~

Answer:

A.  unpleasant because everyone pays attention to what you do

Explanation:

Jekyll believed that man does not have one side ‘but truly two’. He asserts that human soul struggling for mastery is a battleground for a “fiend” and an “angel”. Therefore, it can be separated by bringing the dark side into being. :)

The above passage is taken from a gothic novel ‘Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” by Robert Louis Stevenson. This passage develops the theme "Evil can never truly hide itself” when Utterson and Enfield are horrified when they see Jekyll’s transformation”.

Jekyll believed that man does not have one side ‘but truly two’. He asserts that human soul struggling for mastery is a battleground for a “fiend” and an “angel”. Therefore, it can be separated by bringing the dark side into being.

Gothic novels are stories that incorporate horror and romanticism elements and often include supernatural events and mystery. Explore the characteristics, background, and origin of Gothic novels and discover examples of the supernatural, madness, and romance in Gothic literature.

Gothic novel, European Romantic pseudo medieval fiction having a prevailing atmosphere of mystery and terror. Its heyday was the 1790s, but it underwent frequent revivals in subsequent centuries.

To learn more about Gothic novel, refer

https://brainly.com/question/18852693

#SPJ2

If I were you, I wouldn't let anyone near that crystal vase.

B

If you look at the definition, they spell imploring correctly, and B is the only answer that isn't spelled so in the definiton

Answer:

B

Explanation:

c. ABA because the 1st and 3rd line rhyme

The correct answer is option B ("Denver gets an average of 57 inches of snow every year").

We refer to "logos" as a literary or argumentative device employed to persuade someone of a certain statement using logical reasoning. In the present case, the only example that utilizes an appeal to logos, would be option B, since it's stating a clear logical fact based on statistics. This type of data could very easily be used in an argument to strongly support a specific stance.

Hope this helps!

A is your answer. (●__●)

Answer:

C. The Bill of Rights list the rights all U.S. citizens possess, including the rights to free speech and due process.

Explanation:

Bill of Rights involves the first ten amendments to the constitution of the United States that offers a formal declaration and guarantee of the civil rights and liberties like freedom of speech, assembly, press, and religion. It also displays the limitations of federal and state governments which broadens the concept of equality among the American people. Thus, we may conclude with option C as it best summarizes the purpose(objective) and content of the Bill of Rights.

The objective summary will be C. The Bill of Rights list the rights all U.S. citizens possess, including the rights to free speech and due process.

Bill of Rights involves the first ten amendments to the constitution of the United States that offers a formal declaration and guarantee of the civil rights and liberties like freedom of speech, assembly, press, and religion.

It also displays the limitations of federal and state governments which broadens the concept of equality among the American people. Thus, we may conclude with option C as it best summarizes the purpose(objective) and content of the Bill of Rights.

The correct option is C

Learn more about objective summary

https://brainly.com/question/25046487

#SPJ6

Sample response:

Immigrating to America

Begin by telling about the trip. Include details about most immigrants traveling in steerage. Explain who had to go through Ellis Island and who did not.

Explain about the process of going through Ellis Island. Discuss the steps immigrants went through, including an eye hook test, a mental health test, and a legal examination.

Talk about the challenges immigrants faced. Mention that many did not speak English, had trouble making friends, and were not prepared for their jobs.

What did you include in your procedure? Check all that apply.

I began with the title.

I wrote the steps of my presentation.

I numbered my steps.

I included detailed descriptions of what I will discuss in each step.

I used verbs that command.

Answer:

Immigrating to America

Begin by telling about the trip. Include details about most immigrants traveling in steerage. Explain who had to go through Ellis Island and who did not.

Explain about the process of going through Ellis Island. Discuss the steps immigrants went through, including an eye hook test, a mental health test, and a legal examination.

Talk about the challenges immigrants faced. Mention that many did not speak English, had trouble making friends, and were not prepared for their jobs.

Explanation:

because i just did the assignment