Answer:
The fall of the Western Roman Empire occurred in 476 AD
Explanation:
During the fifth century, the Roman Empire was completely exhausted. Already at the beginning of the century, barbarian tribes began to invade Italy as well. As early as 410 AD, the Visigoths invaded Rome and devastated it for days, which was the first symptom of the collapse of the then unbreakable empire. The weakening of the Roman continued in continuity so that the Romans came into conflict with the Hun tribes. In 451, one of the greatest and bloodiest battles of Roman history took place. True, the result of the battle in the Catalan fields belonged to Rome, but with dire consequences. Only four years after this battle (455.), the Vandals will plunder the "eternal city." All these events will weaken Rome economically, militarily and politically. The last Roman emperor was Romulus Augustus, who was overthrown by German military commander Odoakar and proclaimed king of Italy. Thus, in 476, the largest empire in history ceased to exist.
When we talk about the fall of the Western Roman Empire, we have to look back to the events before 476 AD. The fall of the Roman Empire is not an event that happened "overnight." The causes go back a long way, so for the decline of the Roman Empire, we can say that it is a continuous and long-term process that culminated in 476 AD. Therefore, at the time of the fall, the authorities could do nothing to prevent the Roman Empire from collapsing, an opportunity that led to this event much further into the past. The fact that the Roman rulers were helpless at the time of the fall is also indicated by the fact that Odoakar did not liquidate the last Roman emperor but sent him into retirement (with a very large pension), which means that he did not pose any threat to him. Finally, it is important to point out that the fall of the Roman Empire in world historiography was taken as the beginning of a new period in history, the early Middle Ages.
Answer:
In the fifth century or during, the roman empire was completely exhausted. Already at the beginning of the century, barbarian tribes began to invade Italy as well. As early as 410 AD, the Visigoths invaded Rome and devastated it for days, which was the first symptom of the collapse of the then-unbreakable empire. In 451, one of the greatest and bloodiest battles of Roman history took place. True, the result of the battle in the Catalan fields belonged to Rome, but with dire consequences. Only four years after this battle (455.), the Vandals will plunder the "eternal city." All these events will weaken Rome economically, militarily, and politically. The last Roman emperor was Romulus Augustus, who was overthrown by German military commander Odoakar and proclaimed king of Italy. Thus, in 476, the largest empire in history ceased to exist. When we talk about the fall of the Western Roman Empire, we have to look back to the events before 476 AD. The fall of the Roman Empire is not an event that happened "overnight." The causes go back a long way, so the decline of the Roman Empire, we can say is a continuous and long-term process that culminated in 476 AD. Therefore, at the time of the fall, the authorities could do nothing to prevent the Roman Empire from collapsing, an opportunity that led to this event much further into the past. The fact that the Roman rulers were helpless at the time of the fall is also indicated by the fact that Odoakar did not liquidate the last Roman emperor but sent him into retirement (with a substantial pension), which means that he did not pose any threat to him. Finally, it is essential to point out that the fall of the Roman Empire in world historiography was taken as the beginning of a new historical period, the early Middle Ages. (thank god for Grammarly)
5. Complete the chart by summarizing and explaining the effects of four cases in
which the Supreme Court has interpreted free speech differently (4 points)
Case name
Summary of the case and
ruling
Effects on the
interpretation of the First
Amendment
United States v. O'Brien
Tinker v. Des Moines
Schenck v. United
States
Texas V. Johnson
Four cases in which the Supreme Court interpreted free speech differently are United States v. O'Brien, Tinker v. Des Moines, Schenck v. United States, and Texas v. Johnson.
Explanation:There are several cases in which the Supreme Court has interpreted free speech differently. Here are four examples:
United States v. O'Brien: In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the burning of a draft card during the Vietnam War was not protected by the First Amendment because it was conduct that interfered with a valid government interest.Tinker v. Des Moines: The Supreme Court held that students wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War was protected symbolic speech under the First Amendment, as it did not disrupt the educational process.Schenck v. United States: The Supreme Court ruled that distributing anti-draft leaflets during World War I was not protected speech, as it created a clear and present danger to the country's war effort.Texas v. Johnson: The Supreme Court held that flag burning as a form of political protest is protected by the First Amendment, as it is a form of expressive conduct.These cases have had various effects on the interpretation of the First Amendment, shaping the limits and protections of free speech in different contexts.
Learn more about Supreme Court's interpretation of free speech here:https://brainly.com/question/16121239
#SPJ12
How long have leatherback sea turtles roamed our planet?
Leatherback sea turtles have roamed our planet for 100 million years.
Explanation:
Leatherback sea turtles have a lifespan of about 50 years, these live in oceans and are world's largest turtles about 2m long in length. They also migrate huge distances. These big reptiles have been on our planet earth for a really long time of about 100 million years. These turtles are carnivores in nature i.e they feed on other sea animals like jellyfish. These have been on the planet since dinosaurs existed. For now, these turtles are critically endangered and require conservation and care.
Leatherback sea turtles have existed for around 200 million years and are some of the largest turtles, growing up to seven feet long and weighing over 2,000 pounds.
Leatherback sea turtles have roamed our planet for about 200 million years, making them ancient reptiles that predate many others such as crocodiles, lizards, and snakes. These remarkable creatures are known for their impressive size, with some leatherback turtles reaching up to seven feet in length and weighing over 2,000 pounds. As ectotherms, they lay their eggs on land and exhibit no parental care after their eggs are hatched, a common trait among turtle species.
Select the boxes in the table to compare and contrast Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge’s policies and actions.
Answer:
Harding - raised tariffs.
Coolidge - frugal policies.
Both - pro-business agenda, reduced world wide armament.
Explanation:
Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge were the 29th and 30th Presidents of the United States. Both of their terms were during 1920's.
While their policies differentiated in some aspects, in other they were quite similar. For example, they were both republicans, who had a pro-business agenda.
But, living in the aftermath of World War I, Harding's main political goal was to protect american industries and agriculture to secure postwar recovery and avoid recession. Main strategy for this was to impose and raise tariffs. Coolidge continued with this policies (with keeping the tariffs high, but not raising them anymore), trying to protect american manufacturing against foreign competition. Harding's tariffs were at the record high by that time.
Also, they were both aiming to reduce world wide armament to prevent another disaster like the WWI. While Harding urged for lower defence costs during his campaign, this was not a major issue for him. He enacted an international agreement for reducing naval fleets of major powers at that time - USA, UK and Japan. On the other side, Calvin Coolidge's primary foreign policy initiative was the Kellog-Briand Pact of 1928, with the goal of renuncing war, as an instrument of national policy. Even though this Pact was never fully achieved, he managed to cut spending for the military, which leads us to his broader policies of cutting military spendings.
As oposed to Harding who was a protectionist, Calvin Coolidge believed in the minimal involvement of the state in order to produce government surplus, which is why he is known by his frugal policies.
raised tariffs - Harding
pro-business agenda - Both
reduced worldwide armaments - Harding
turned a profit in the White House through frugal policies - Coolidge
compare and contrast the ancient Roman religion at the start of the empire to the religion that was dominant toward the end and collapse of the empire
Romans were firstly polytheistic, but at the end of Empire Christianity was official religion.
Explanation:
The religion of the Romans is primarily focused on family and worship of ancestors. The first gods worshiped by the Romans were those protecting the family. Each family worshiped the gods of the house, and the father of the family performed many rites before the house altar. Every day, sacrificial gifts (wine, bread, fruits) to Lara, the patron god of the hearth, were placed on the altar. The Romans adopted the Greek gods very early, giving them sometimes different powers and attributes. At the same time, they continued to worship some very ancient Roman gods. So they worshiped Janus, who was the ancient Roman god of all beginnings and endings, and the patron saint of doors and entrances.From 313 according to Edict of Milan, Christianity became an official religion.Learn more on Roman religion on
https://brainly.com/question/895874
https://brainly.com/question/901148
https://brainly.com/question/2592241
#learnwithBrainly
2. What appears to be the Democratic Party's belief on how much taxes citizens should pay to
the government?
Answer:
The traditional policy of Democratic Party´s administrations has been to raise taxes according to income levels. They more you earn, the more taxes you pay, seems to be the philosophy . Raising taxes for people of high incomes are a fiscal tool that supports social spending, an important concern of Democrats.
Explanation:
How did new scientific discoveries between the 15th and 18th centuries
contribute to the Enlightenment?
O
A. They caused massive political disruptions that left countries
looking for new governments.
O
B. They suggested that reason could provide answers about the
world that tradition and religion could not.
O
C. They convinced Catholic leaders to make major changes to church
beliefs and teachings.
O
D. They contributed to a period of peace that helped philosophers
communicate more easily
SUBMIT
B. They suggested that reason could provide answers about the
world that tradition and religion could not.
Explanation:
The Enlightenment movement represented ideas that pulled the civilization of the West out of the darkness of the Middle Ages and then contributed to the greatest prosperity of humanity ever recorded in human history. When the voice of common sense revealed the excuses and techniques by which people in the Middle Ages uttered their evil deeds and renunciation of their life responsibility, and when a critical mass of people resisted the oppressive pressures and manipulative methods of the church, a new age dawned for human civilization, with a prosperity whose fruits we still see everywhere today.Learn more on Enlightenment on
https://brainly.com/question/1600484
https://brainly.com/question/13310693
https://brainly.com/question/1023065
#learnwithBrainly
Which organization called for a boycott of California grapes?
Answer:
On September 8, 1965, Filipino farm workers organized as the Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee decided to strike against grape growers in Delano, California, to protest years of poor pay and working conditions.
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer choice is UFW
Complete the passage about an event in Russian history. A crowd of about 20,000 people demonstrated in 1905 in St. Petersburg to appeal for ________. This demonstration led to ______.
First blank options- the freedom of serfs, workers reforms, the appointment of a new czar.
Second blank options- Bloody Sunday, the Decembrist revolt, or the Crimean war.
The correct options are:
A crowd of about 20,000 people demonstrated in 1905 in St. Petersburg to appeal for workers' reforms. This demonstration led to the Bloody Sunday.
This demonstration along with the Mutiny on the battleship Potemkin (1905) are understood as the first phase of the Socialist Revolution in Russia in early the 20th century.
This series of rebellion against the czar led to the organization of the first soviets, which would be fundamental for the October Revolution 1917. Soviets were councils of organized workers to defend their rights.
A crowd of about 20,000 people demonstrated in 1905 in St. Petersburg to appeal for [tex]\boxed{\text{workers reforms}}[/tex]. This demonstration led to [tex]\boxed{\text{Bloody Sunday}}[/tex].
The event described in the passage refers to the 1905 Russian Revolution, which was a wave of mass political and social unrest that spread through vast areas of the Russian Empire. The demonstration mentioned is known as the Bloody Sunday massacre, which occurred on January 22, 1905 (January 9 in the Julian calendar, which was used in Russia at the time).
The first blank pertains to the reason for the demonstration. The options given are the freedom of serfs, workers reforms, and the appointment of a new czar. Serfdom in Russia had been abolished in 1861 by Czar Alexander II, more than four decades prior to the 1905 events. Therefore, appealing for the freedom of serfs would not have been relevant in 1905. The appointment of a new czar was not a demand of the demonstrators; they were seeking reforms from the current czar, Nicholas II. Hence, the most appropriate option for the first blank is workers reforms, as the demonstrators were appealing for better working conditions, fair wages, and political reforms.
The second blank refers to the consequence of the demonstration. The options are Bloody Sunday, the Decembrist revolt, and the Crimean war. The Decembrist revolt occurred in 1825, and the Crimean war took place from 1853 to 1856, both of which are unrelated to the 1905 event. Bloody Sunday, on the other hand, is the name given to the event when the Imperial Guard fired upon a peaceful crowd of workers led by Father Georgy Gapon, resulting in the death and injury of hundreds of people. This tragic event significantly escalated tensions and contributed to the revolutionary atmosphere of 1905. Therefore, the correct option for the second blank is Bloody Sunday.
Why did the British promise some of their colonies independence during World War II?
The British felt sorry for their colonies.
The British believed it was wrong to have colonies.
The British wanted colonial troops to help in the fighting.
O The British wanted to follow the example that had been set by Germany.
Answer:
C.) The British wanted colonial troops to help in the fighting
Explanation:
Troops from the British Empire fought in every theatre of war through the years of World War Two - as they had fought in a range of conflicts, on the side of Britain, for the past 150 years or so. There were over two and a half million Indian citizens in uniform during the war.
The British promised independence after WW2 because they wanted colonial troops to help in the fighting.
What was the second world war?This was the war that took place between the axis powers and the allied powers.
The reason for the war was because the allied forces wanted to stop the aggression of the axis powers.
Read more on ww2 here:
https://brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ5
Which of the following describes a similarity between the kingdoms of Ghana and Malia
Answer:
Both grew wealthy by controlling access to west african gold mines.
This statement describes a similarity between the kingdoms of Ghana and Malia
Explanation:
The Ghana and the Malia were two strong and powerful kingdoms which established and extended a good as well as a mutual relationship with one another in terms of everything. They became very wealthy and emerged to be very powerful due to the growth of control accessed to the west african gold mines.
Initially, during the early ages they did not have much interest and hence did not interfere much in the trade and business sectors. They trained and raised powerful armies that were capable of increasing and extending their territories.
How does Young explain the effects of the price of bread?
Final answer:
Young explains the effects of the price of bread by discussing its characteristics as a Giffen good and the broader implications of inflation and hyperinflation on the economy.
Explanation:
Young analyzes the effects of the price of bread by showcasing its role as a Giffen good, which is an inferior product that sees an increase in demand as its price rises. This is contrary to normal goods, where demand typically decreases with an increase in price. In the case of bread, if its price goes up, families might end up buying more bread because it remains the most affordable food option despite the price hike, especially if they need to reach a certain caloric intake. This could lead to a reduction in the purchase of more expensive food items.
In terms of the broader economic impact, hyperinflation could lead to a scenario where money loses its value so rapidly that people abandon the monetary system and revert to bartering or using a more stable foreign currency. The hyperinflation example of a loaf of bread costing $550 million illustrates an extreme case of the devaluation of currency, emphasizing how critical the stability of a currency is, to maintaining functional markets and an economy.
how old is jesus ???????????
Answer:
32 years old that was from google lol
Explanation:
#1) According to the constitution, how many people represent each state in the senate?
#2) According to the constitution how many people represent each state in the House of Representatives?
#3) Who could vote for representatives in the lower house?
#4) who would elect the senators ?
If anyone knows the answer.. thank you :D
The U.S. Constitution determines Senate and House representation, with two senators per state and House seats based on population, elected by voters, or designated by state legislatures.
According to the U.S. Constitution:
Senate: Each state is represented by two senators, totaling 100 senators currently.House of Representatives: Representation in the House is based on state population, with a total of 435 members.Voters in each state elect members of the House of Representatives, while state legislatures initially chose senators, a process now changed by the Seventeenth Amendment of 1913.How are the camps an example of legally sanctioned discrimination and prosecution?
(This is talking about WW2 Japanese Internment Camps)
Answer:
Japanese Internment camps during World War II were an example of legal because it issued by President of America, labelling them as a 'The New Enemy' in America.
Explanation:
After the attack of the Pearl harbour by the Imperial Japanese Navy's aircraft, President Roosevelt issued Executive Order NO. 9066. Under this order, American Japanese forced to leave their house to move in the detention camps. American Japanese sent to live in camps so that the authorities could take control over them. Majority of the American Japanese lived in states of California, Washington, and Oregon.
Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs.
Match the following laws with their outcomes.
the Bill of Rights 1789
the Judiciary Act of 1789
Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions
States claimed they could nullify la
they thought were unconstitutional.
Congress passed the first 10 amendments
to the US Constitution.
Federal courts were established.
Answer:
States claimed they could nullify laws they thought were unconstitutional.Answer: Kentucky and Virginia ResolutionsCongress passed the first 10 amendments to the US Constitution.Answer: The Bill of Rights 1789
Federal courts were established.Answer: The Judiciary Act of 1789
Hope this helps!
The tiles matching the correct outcomes are as follows:
Laws: Outcomes:
1. Bill of Rights, 1789 Congress passed the first 10 amendments to the US
Constitution.
2. Judiciary Act, 1798 Federal courts were established.
3. Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions States claimed they could nullify laws
they thought were unconstitutional.
Interestingly, the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, which attempted to induce other states to tow their stance, were intended to give states the right to declare a federal law unconstitutional if states did not accept it.
Thus, these resolutions followed "The Alien and Sedition Acts" which introduced McCarthyism based on the fear of communism.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/16688793
how were louis xiv and james ii similar and different
Answer: Louis XIV and James II aspired to an absolutist system of government.
Explanation:
Similarities: Both rulers advocated absolutism as a system of government. We can define the state in absolutism as a monarchy. It is a system of government created by breaking the links between the Middle Ages and the New Age. The rulers, as proponents of these ideas, sought to put all the institutions of the state under their control. The most obvious example of an absolutist monarchy in Europe is France.
Differences : Unlike the French ruler Louis XIV, who fully implemented his absolutist values, this was not the case with James II. James II in his quest to make England an absolutist monarchy did not find popular support. James II's intentions were contrary to the views of the English Parliament. In the end, coming into conflict with Parliament and even the church (absolutism implied the subjugation of the church), James II would ultimately lose this battle. On the other hand, Louis XIV did not have these problems and until his death, he enjoyed the absolutist model of government.
What happened to the men who killed John Earl Reese in Texas?
Answer:
The men that killed John Earl Reese were found guilty and sentenced to prison, but the sentences were suspended so that they never went to jail. John Earl Reese was 16 years old when he was dancing in a cafe in Mayflower, Texas and white men fired shots into the windows. Reese was killed and two others were wounded
Answer:
The man who killed John Reese was found guilty and sent to prison .
which characteristic of the Mughal empire does the Taj Mahal reflect?
The Taj Mahal reflects the hybridized Indo-Islamic culture of the Mughal empire and was built as a tomb for Emperor Shah Jahan's wife. It showcases a blend of Indian and Islamic architectural styles and features intricate decorations.
Explanation:The characteristic of the Mughal empire that the Taj Mahal reflects is the hybridized Indo-Islamic culture of the dynasty. The Taj Mahal, built by Emperor Shah Jahan in 1631 as a tomb for his favorite wife Mumtaz Mahal, perfectly represents the blend of Indian and Islamic architectural styles. It features a large dome surrounded by four minarets, a reflecting pool, and exquisite decorations such as calligraphy and semiprecious stones.
Learn more about Taj Mahal here:https://brainly.com/question/8774406
#SPJ12
Which two events happened as a result of the US invasion of Irak?
Saddam and Hassan were executed. This also led to the political instability in Iraq.
Explanation:
The United States of America invaded Iraq in the year 2003. The administration in the United States were told by the president Bush that they were going to invade Iraq.
With this invasion, there was a lot of instability in Iraq in political and economic terms. In the invasion, Saddam and Hassan were also executed. This had even more adverse effects on the country.
what is the location referred to as ""here"" in the quote from the divine comedy
The correct answer is Purgatorio
Explanation: "For such pride, here one pays the penalty: and I'd not be here yet, had it not been that, while I
Still could sin, I turned to Him."
Select all that apply. Richard Nixon _____. encouraged President Thieu to resign was the first U.S. president to resign from office was the first appointed president in U.S. history was disgraced by the Watergate scandal
Answer:
The right answers are:
- Nixon was the first U.S. president to resign from office .
- He was disgraced by the Watergate scandal.
Explanation:
Richard Milhous Nixon , the 37th President of the United States (1969-1974), resigned on August 9, 1974. After a long investigation, justice obstruction and amazing investigative reports, the House of Representatives decided to impeach Nixon. Before being impeached, Nixon preferred to submit his resignation. Nixon had ordered to spy the Democratic Party´s campaign in 1972 in what became the Watergate scandal, then he lied by denying any responsibility and was behind administration efforts to obstruct justice.
What do all of the people below have in common? A. George Washington B. Baron Von Steuben C. George Rogers Clark D. Casimir Pulaski E. Marquis de Lafayette F. Alexander Hamilton 1. Enlightenment Thinkers who wrote in support of independence 2. military leaders during the Revolutionary War 3. presidents of the United States 4. founders and leaders of some of the colonies 5. foreigners that came to America to fight for freedom
Answer:
They all wanted independence.
Explanation:
Answer:
The people all have one thing in common which was they where all Military leaders during the Revolutionary war
Explanation:
George Washington, Baron Von Steuben, George Rogers Clark, Casimir Pulaski, Marquis de Lafayette F, Alexander Hamilton where all military officers commanding different divisions during the revolutionary war because they all fought for Independence
What message is the artist trying to send with this cartoon?
The Articles of Confederation is able to overcome obstacles the nation face
B
The Articles of Confederation provides a strong central government.
The Articles of Confederation should replace the Declaration of Independer
D
The Articles of Confederation are not able to overcome obstacles the nation
02019
Illuminate Education
Inc.
Plis is for final test
Answer:
b
Explanation:
yuh know i di this in class
What role did John Brown have in setting the stage for the Civil War
Answer:
John Brown is referred to as an abolitionist who led a group of people. He led this group against the State of Virginia. He found it important to raise this group to fight against the armed slavery. Even though he was bankrupt by the age of 42, he made it quite clear that his intention was to destroy the system of slavery. In his final days he was tried by the State of Virginia on the grounds of treason and murder. The raid is considered as a fail but it is undeniable true that the raid in fuelled the rage of the people which definitely became a root of the Civil War.
John Brown played a significant role in setting the stage for the Civil War through his radical abolitionist actions, particularly the raid on Harpers Ferry.
In 1859, John Brown, a fervent abolitionist, led a small group of followers in an attack on the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia (now West Virginia). His plan was to seize the weapons stored there and use them to arm a large-scale slave uprising. The raid was unsuccessful; Brown was captured by U.S. Marines led by Colonel Robert E. Lee, and he was subsequently tried, convicted, and hanged for treason against the state of Virginia, murder, and inciting a slave insurrection.
Brown's actions and his trial polarized the nation, deepening the divide between the North and the South. To many in the North, Brown was seen as a martyr who had sacrificed his life for the abolitionist cause. His actions highlighted the moral and political conflicts over slavery and contributed to the growing tension that would eventually lead to the Civil War. Conversely, in the South, Brown was viewed as a dangerous fanatic whose actions were indicative of the North's intentions to interfere with Southern institutions and incite servile insurrection.
The significance of John Brown's raid lies not only in its immediate impact but also in its contribution to the radicalization of the abolitionist movement and the hardening of positions on both sides of the slavery debate. His actions and the response to them underscored the irreconcilable differences between the free and slave states, making the Civil War increasingly inevitable.
2. What statement best describes why the words We the People are shown in Source 1?
A They are the first words of the Declaration of Independence.
B. They are the first words of the preamble of the Constitution.
C. They are the first words of the Bill of Rights.
D. They are the words on the American flag.
Answer:
B. They are the first words of the preamble of the Constitution
Explanation:
The words 'We the People' are the first words of the preamble of the United States Constitution which represents the basic principle that the power of governance stems from its citizens.
Explanation:These words, 'We the People', are not the first words of the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, or words on the American flag, as suggested by the other answers. Rather, they are the famous first words of the preamble to the United States Constitution.
These words represent the essence of democracy by emphasizing that the power of governance comes from its citizens, instead of a king or external source. 'We the People' is seen as expressing the fundamental concept that the government serves its citizens and its authority is granted by them.
Learn more about We the People here:https://brainly.com/question/37930356
#SPJ12
Introduction: Match each word with the phrase that best describes its meaning.
declaration
power to enforce laws
authority
a forceful statement
self-government
something that cannot be taken away
unalienable
the right to govern oneself
1) Intro
Done
The words «declaration», «power to enforce laws», «authority», «self-government» and «unalienable» match with their descriptions as a forceful statement, authority, power to enforce laws, the right to govern oneself and something that cannot be taken away respectively.
Explanation:The following words match with the corresponding phrases that describe their meanings:
Declaration: a forceful statement. Power to enforce laws: authority. Authority: power to enforce laws. Self-government: the right to govern oneself. Unalienable: something that cannot be taken away. Learn more about Vocabulary Matching here:
https://brainly.com/question/36508855
#SPJ12
A declaration is a forceful statement, authority refers to the power to enforce laws, self-government is the ability to govern oneself, and unalienable means something that cannot be taken away.
Explanation:A declaration is a forceful statement that proclaims or asserts something. It is often used to make a formal announcement or to express a strong opinion.
Authority refers to the power or right to enforce laws and make decisions. It is typically held by those in positions of leadership or government.
Self-government is the ability of a group or community to govern itself and make decisions without outside interference. It often involves the establishment of a system of laws and institutions to maintain order and provide for the welfare of the people.
The term unalienable means something that cannot be taken away or given up. In the context of self-government, it refers to the inherent right of individuals or communities to govern themselves and make their own choices.
Learn more about definitions of termshttps://brainly.com/question/14308795
#SPJ2
Why was the discovery of the New World a momentous event?
Answer:
Columbus's voyage of discovery also had another important result; it contributed to the development of the modern concept of progress. To many Europeans, the New World seemed to be a place of innocence, freedom, and eternal youth. ... But the discovery of the New World threw many supposedly universal ideals into doubt.
Explanation:
___ what is the Aztec emperor. what did the Spanish do with him
Answer:
Montezuma II was the Aztec emperor. Hernan Cortez and his men were under a siege in a safe(where the city's gold was kept). They trapped Montezuma in there with them.
How did the European colonization of the New World and the development of the Atlantic System affect the economies and politics of Southwest Asia and the Indian Ocean?
European colonization introduced modern technology and expanded commerce in Southwest Asia.
Explanation:
Europeans were successful in taking entire control of Asia. Due o the boom of industrial expansion in Britain and other European countries, many Europeans established power over Asians. Britain annexed Burma, Penang and Malaya states thereby expressing its domination and superiority in south west Asia. The phenomenon of imperialism by Europe which was called new imperialism had seen the conquests of all empires in Asia and thereby surrendering to the dominance of European countries.
The concept of 'white man' burden' enabled the Europeans in civilizing the less gifted and less fortunate in south west Asia. Asia witnessed the colonial imperialism which brought light to many fields and it was also striving towards the age of modernity and development.
The Olmec civilization
A) had poor architectural skills.
B) left behind mysterious stone sculptures.
C) were the most advanced pre-Columbian civilization.
D) was not able to trade because of its geographic isolation.
Answer:
b
Explanation:b