how did the GI Bill of Rights affect the future of the U.S.

Although no shots were fired, the Berlin blockade was the first case of a direct conflict between the West and the Soviet Union. The blockade was an attempt by the Soviets to gain control over Berlin. But the airlift crushed their plan. As a result, the Soviets backed down from the conflict, which could be seen as a victory for the West.

The international peacekeeping organization which was formed directly after the end of World War II, was the United Nations. Its aims were to solve conflict between nations so as to prevent the outbreak of a war. Besides, this intergovernmental organization which replaced the ineffective League of Nations, has sought to pursue international peace and security by developing friendly relations among nations, protecting human rights, delivering humanitarian assistance as well as achieving international cooperation among its members.

Answer:

During mid-19th-century overland trails were very popular means of travel by immigrants. The immigrants began to settle North America and the region west of Great Plains. After the Mexican and American war in 1849 mass immigration started again. Two major wagon networks that were famous among the migrants were the Oregon Trail and Santa Fe trail. The Santa Fe trail was the southern trail. The Oregon trail was Missouri based route. According to estimates between 1843 and 1869, at least 500,000 emigrants used the Missouri based trails.

A. The Red Scare

Communists were associated with the color red because of the red flag of the Soviet Union -- thus the "Red Scare." One manifestation of the Red Scare was how people's privacy was invaded. Accusations about communists and communist sympathizers were aimed at all sorts of people.  Many people in the Hollywood film industry were targeted during that time, for instance.  But defenders of freedom (including film and television people) fought back against that.  Those who aimed to protect the rights and liberties of each individual saw the Red Scare tactics as "witch hunts," where we suspect our neighbors of evil for no good reason.

Speaking of "witch hunts," the playwright Arthur Miller wrote a really powerful play in 1953, during the Cold War, which focused on the Salem witch trials. He was making the point that what was happening in the Red Scare (hunting for communists) was another manifestation of the witch-burning craze that had happened at a previous time in history.

A) He claimed he was following orders from his superiors.

At the Nuremberg Trials, Rudolf Höss defended his actions by claiming he was merely following orders from his superiors. This defense, commonly referred to as the "Nuremberg Defense," was used by many Nazi officials to argue that they should not be held personally responsible for their crimes as they were acting under higher authority. Höss emphasized that he was carrying out policies dictated by higher-ranking Nazi leaders.

Complete Question:

How did Rudolf Höss defend his actions to the court?

A) He claimed he was following orders from his superiors.

B) He insisted he did not know what was happening in the camps.

C) He argued that the prisoners were treated humanely.

D) He stated that he believed in the Nazi ideology and thought his actions were justified.

Answer:

B.Each established a totalitarian government.  

Explanation:

Totalitarianism was a conservative reaction to democracy and political and economic liberalism. Thus, after the disaster of World War I, the idea arose that governments should be strong to be efficient.  It would be up to the citizens to follow in the footsteps of a charismatic leader who would be in charge of conducting national politics. Political parties should not exist, for they were the expression of discord.

Josef Stalin used totalitarianism in order to establish socialism in the Soviet Union. In the same way, Benito Mussolini used totalitarianism to implant the fascist in Italy.

King George's primary goals were to restore the monarchy's power, end the rule of the Whigs, and conclude the Seven Years' War. His approach was not devoid of ministerial advice and his policies led to the American Revolution.

The correct statement about the rule of King George III is: "King George's main goals for his reign were to return the monarchy to its former glory, end the rule of the Whigs in Parliament, and end the Seven Years' War." During his reign, King George was determined to reassert the power of the monarchy, which had been in economic and political decline. His ambition was also to end the influence of the Whigs, a political faction in Parliament with whom he often clashed. Moreover, he sought the conclusion of the Seven Years' War, a major conflict which had been draining on the nation's resources. His approach towards decision making was not autocratic, he often relied on his ministers. English policy in American colonies became increasingly assertive and controversial under his reign, leading to the American Revolution.

https://brainly.com/question/20671273

#SPJ12

According to the author of the US telegraph, the United Nation was participating in the United Nations in order to reduce the power of the United States in the international stage.

The USSR became widely involved in the United Nations and its decisions. His admission to the Organization occurred in the year 1945, urged by the United States of America.

But with the development of the Cold War, the USSR began to use its power to confront American advances in international politics. Thus, he insisted that there be a right of veto in the Security Council, in order to boycott the American proposals in there.

When one is on the silk road, the things that you would

Silk road was an essential trade route which helped linked the East and West of the world.

The road was mostly known for the trades that occurred there and how it assist established civilization.

Learn more on the silk road here: https://brainly.com/question/12293841

#SPJ1

Final answer:

On the Silk Road, one would experience a rich sensory and cultural panorama, seeing diverse traders and goods, hearing multiple languages, feeling the textures of traded items, and tasting and smelling exotic spices and dishes. It was a hub of trade and cultural exchange, connecting distant lands and civilizations.

Explanation:

If you were on the Silk Road, you would experience an array of senses from sight to smell. You'd likely see a diverse mix of people, including traders from various parts of the world, camels carrying goods, and perhaps even caravans setting up camp for the night. The sounds would range from the chatter of different languages and dialects, the clinking of coins as trade deals are made, to the noises of animals and the bustling activities of marketplaces. You might feel the rough textures of silk, spices, and various goods being traded. The taste and smell of exotic spices in the air would be unmistakable, along with the aroma of cooked dishes from various cultures mingling together. Each stop along the Silk Road offered a chance to experience new and unique flavors from distant lands. The Silk Road was not just about trade; it was also a cultural exchange. You would feel the vibrancy of different cultures coming together, sharing their knowledge, goods, and traditions. It was a testament to the interconnectedness of humanity, even in ancient times.

The correct answer is D) they have inspired similar laws in the United States and other countries.

The mentioned three commandments have in common that they have inspired similar laws in the United States and other countries.

The Ten Commandments were given by God to Moses at the top of the Sinai Mountain. Those ten commandments served as the Hebrew code of conduct for the people in those early years according to the Old Testament. Three of them have inspired other nations to be included in the United States and other countries. They are: you shall not kill, you shall not steal, and you shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.  

There are several reasons why we might oppose to the annexation of Hawaii by the United States government. Some of this could be:

Answer:

List of arguments against the annexation of Hawaii:

Hawaiian people not consulted

American people not consulted

unconstitutional method of increasing US territory

Hawaii too remote; too costly to defend

ethnically diverse population in Hawaii

not crucial for the US commercial interests of business and trade

not militarily necessary for the United States

better to secure independence of Hawaiian people with a more favorable policy rather than a takeover

Justification: One argument against the annexation was that it wasn’t crucial to the US commercial interests of business and trade. Even though the United States had extensive trade relations with Hawaii, it didn’t really need to annex the islands. The United States was engaged in trade across the world. It could have found a substitute trade partner that was also financially profitable instead of annexing the islands to prevent its colonization by others.

Edmentum Answer

Answer:

Patriotic call to the American people for duty and action.

Explanation:

Thomas Paine's pamphlet "Crisis, No. 1" was to persuade the American people to fight for their country. This pamphlet can also be regarded as a wartime propaganda as it supports the idea of war and the American people's need to join the war.

He also argues that since America had been trying all ways to prevent a war, God will be with them. For God will surely help a nation that had tried all means to avoid wars. He also emphasized on the right choice of going to war. This cause of revolution is right for they are concerned with the rights and freedom of the Americans. So, the people need not have any reservations about fighting but instead be patriotic about it.

Answer:

it is D. United Arab Emirates

Answer:

A) United Kingdom

Explanation:

Under the Balfour declaration from the United Kingdom, and approved by the United Nations, was supported, and technically agreed on a territory partition Between Israel and Palestine. the measure was taken between other reasons,  for the lack of an official territory for the Jew people, forced to spread across Europe and other territories forming different communities.

Is not a secret to affirm that UK made this in order to ¨make a favor¨ to the jews, and receive their support as a strategical ally in WWI times.

However, this ¨territory partition¨  and land assignment for the jew people was a boiling point for a series of political and Belic conflicts between the cultures and religions generating a constant confrontation between factions, leaving thousands of victims in the process.

The purpose of voter registration is to assure that people vote only once.

Shaka Zulu was the leader of the Zulu empire from the late 18th century until the early 19th century, oral traditions refer to him as a heartless leader and as an amazing military strategist. At first, most of the Zulu tribes identified themselves as farmers and they struggled because of the internal conflicts between each other. Shaka Zulu unified the Zulu tribes and formed one of the most powerful African nations that could even stop the British colonization in the south of Africa.

Shaka Zulu led tribes who mostly identified as Option C) warriors.

Shaka Zulu, a prominent leader of the Zulu Kingdom in the early 19th century, led tribes that primarily identified as warriors. The Zulu people were known for their strong military organization and tactics, which were revolutionized under Shaka's leadership. He implemented significant reforms in military strategy, weaponry, and organization, creating a formidable force that expanded the Zulu Kingdom's influence and power in southern Africa.

The identity of the Zulu people as warriors was deeply ingrained in their culture and social structure. Warriors played a central role in society, and military prowess was highly valued. Young men underwent rigorous training from an early age to become skilled fighters, and military success brought social status and prestige.

Therefore, when considering the historical context of Shaka Zulu and the Zulu Kingdom, the correct answer to the question is C. warriors. This reflects their cultural identity and the central role of military activities in their society during Shaka's reign.

Answer:

The Latin American country that won its independence from France is Haiti.

Explanation:

Haiti was the first Latin American nation to gain its independence from France in 1804, after a successful anti-colonial and anti-slavery actions against the French colonial rule. This movement triggered further independence movements in Spanish America.

A primary source is the best place to find evidence for an argumentative essay. Option C is correct.

Argumentative essays seek to present a position on an issue and provide numerous reasons, supported by evidence, for agreeing with that position.

An argumentative should have one thesis statement which consists on one sentence in the introductory paragraph that concisely summarizes the main point and claim, and should present the stance of the writer on the topic.

The table on the price of different number of pens and proportionality is B. Yes, because the price is 3 times the number of pens.

A proportional relationship between two variables (in this case, the number of pens and the price) means that they are related by a constant ratio. That is, if we increase one variable by a certain factor, the other variable should increase by the same factor.

In the given table, we can see that the ratio of price to the number of pens is constant.

For example, if we compare the first two rows, we have:

Price for 2 pens = $6

Price for 4 pens = $12

They are increasing by 3 which means that the price is three times the number of pens so the increase is proportional.

Find out more on proportional relationships at https://brainly.com/question/28777033

#SPJ1

Answer: it B

Explanation:

:P

The correct answer is A. The factor that contributed to the success of federal troops in the Red River War was the destruction of native Plain villages

The Red River War was a military campaign led by the US Army in 1874 to repel Indian Comanche, Kiowa, South Cheyenne and Arapaho tribes from the southern Great Plains. This conflict ended in 1875, when the last group of Comanche warriors offered his surrender to Fort Sill. Until then, they were the last free Indians in the southwestern United States.

The war began when white hunters, backed by the federal government, practically exterminated the buffalo, which was the main source of food for the natives of the area. This, added to continuous incursions of the whites into their territories, was taken as an affront by the native tribes.

The determining factor that gave the victory to the federal forces was the devastation of the native villages, which cut the already scarce supplies that the tribes had as a result of the practice extinction of the buffalo in the area. This made it impossible for the tribes to stay in battle against well-supplied troops.