When analyzing any literary work, be it a full text, an excerpt, or any document, for that matter, one way, or one technique that can be used is the analysis of a cause-effect, or causal relationship. Basically, this technique allows the critic to discover the links that exist between a situation, or an event, that takes place and the consequences that derive from said cause. It is almost like tracing a pattern backwards that explains why an action, or a result, happened. In order then for the reader, or critic to use this technique, he/she must take into consideration a series of things:
A: Describe the characters´ actions from past events. This is because, when you discover the past events, you can find an explanation and a link with the action realized and you can understand the sequence in the story.
B: Identify the cause of the action or event. This is a more direct pathway, as it establishes the direct link between cause and effect. In the first option, background history will explain in some form why a character acts in a certain way, but it may not always be the only cause. However, when you find the direct cause of an action, you find this causality.
D: Consider the effect of the action of event. By doing this you are continuing the process that is necessary to establish a cause and effect relationship. It gives you the full picture and the full understanding of the how, when, and why and also of the outcomes. It is almost like the finishing touch to unraveling the mystery in a story.
Answer:
a,b,d
Explanation:
One log forms a natural bridge. The log has a span of 40 feet.
Which sentence combines the two sentences using a present participial phrase?
One log spanning 40 feet forms a natural bridge.
Which of the following would be a good probing question to ask in the following scenario?
Interviewer: Did you like your last job?
Interviewee: Yeah, it was great.
"What was your favorite part about it?"
"How long were you there?"
"What appeals to you most about this position?"
none of the above
Well,
I would most likely choose this answer.
"What appeals to you most about this position?"
Answer:
The option that would be a good proving question to ask in this scenario is “What was your favorite part about it?”
Explanation:
The provided scenario introduces an interviewer who wants to know about the work experience of the interviewee in their former job, then after the affirmation of the interviewee of liking their last job, a good proving question would give the interviewer the necessary information to have a better understanding of the topic that is being discussed.
Which example is the weakest research question?
A. What was the cultural significance of the "space race"? B. Why should the government continue to fund space travel? C. How long does it take to travel from the Earth to the moon? D. What are the possible consequences of prolonged space travel?
C. How long does it take to travel from the Earth to the moon?
This is the weakest research question because it can be easily answered. According to a 2 second Google search, it takes about 3 days for a spacecraft to reach the moon from Earth. This question does not allow for a lot of research for development into an essay. Options A, B and D all have a variety of possibilities that would allow for a multi-paragraph essay with significant topic development.
Answer: Why should the government continue to fund space travel?
Explanation: Apex
1Poe really was the inventor of the detective story, which he called the "ratiocinative" tale. 2Here believing the effect intended was "to perplex the reader and whet his desire for elucidation," he originated two devices useful to this day. 3One might be called "the device of the baffled friend": He gave his brilliant detective a companion not good at solutions and had him tell the story. 4Viewing the happenings through this narrator's eyes, the reader shares his growing puzzlement. 5Poe used his second device at the tale's end: He had the detective disclose his surprising solution and then "elucidate" step by step the reasoning which led to it. 6"The Purloined Letter" demonstrated Poe's use of these two devices in a detective story.
(From: United States in Literature by Walter Blair, Paul Farmer, Theodore Hornberger, and Margaret Wasson. C. 1963 by Scott, Foresman and Company. Reprinted by permission.)
On the basis of the context clue, what is the meaning of the ratiocinative tale?
Ratiocination is the process of logical reasoning. A ratiocinative tale is a type of detective story in which there is a conflict or a case the detective needs to solve, following clues is a logical process. The attractive aspect of these stories is that the clues tend to be misinterpreted by some of the characters, which leads the reader to follow this train of thought, and it is only at the end that the detective reveals the truth, disclosing the true meaning behind the different clues.
Answer:
It's Detective Story
Explanation:
When President Roosevelt gave his Four Freedoms speech in 1941, much of his audience opposed getting involved in World War II, which was raging in Europe at the time. Read the following excerpt:
In the future days, which we seek to make secure, we look forward to a world founded upon four essential human freedoms. The first is freedom of speech and expression everywhere in the world. The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way everywhere in the world. The third is freedom from want . . . .The fourth is freedom from fear . . . .Which best explains the role that the theme of freedom plays in this excerpt?
A. It establishes basic principles on which everyone in the audience can agree.
B. It argues that all Americans are free to oppose World War II.
C. It demonstrates that too many Americans are afraid to oppose their enemies.
D. It explains that many Americans do not understand economics.
I go with A because feel like it's the best one
Answer: A. It establishes basic principles on which everyone in the audience can agree.
Explanation: The option that best explains the role that the theme of freedom plays in this excerpt of President Roosevelt's "Four Freedoms" speech is it establishes basic principles on which everyone in the audience can agree. These four freedoms are the basic freedoms that all human beings have to have access to. These are the basic human rights, so everybody in the audience can agree to this. To defend these rights is why America, neutral up to that moment, has to enter the war.
Which audience is best suited for this informational text? To learn to draw, you need the right instruments. You can choose to learn with a pencil or a felt-tip pen, or even a stylus and tablet computer. The pencil’s advantage is that you can erase any mistakes. On the other hand, learning to draw with a pen helps build confidence. Whatever you choose, the learning process is the same. You also must use good-quality paper, especially if you draw with a pen. Once you have your drawing instrument and paper or tablet computer, you’re ready to learn. The first step is learning to draw basic shapes. Start with drawing straight lines of varying lengths without the help of a ruler. Try to keep the lines as straight as possible. This is particularly challenging because your wrist tends to move in an arc. Once you start drawing straight lines, keep practicing. In fact, practice every day. A. people interested in learning the basics of drawing B. people interested in how people drew in the past C. people interested in drawing using online programs D. people interested in buying new art supplies
The correct answer is A. I am sure. Hope it helps:)
What the poet feels about snakes is true for all wild creatures. Comment in 100 words
Answer:
Yes the poet feels the same about other wild creatures as it feels about the snakes.
Explanation:
In the Poem "Snake" D.H. Lawrence is trying to convey the message that snakes is a beautiful creature, one that needs to be honored and not to be killed. Lawrence also says that snakes are in harmony with nature than the over-educated human beings and uses positive language to describe snakes. He also admits that all wild creatures including snakes has its right to live as long as they cause no harm. It is the man's unreasonable activities that makes him the victim of wild creatures.
Axel is thinking about changing the word feared with dreaded why do u thinkhe want to make that change
Because , Dreaded is a stronger word.
What is the degree of comparison of the underlined adjective in the sentence? The runners were tired but happy at the end of the race. A. Comparative B.Superlative C.Positive i need help
The answer is Positive, I hope this helps! ;)
What mood is created in this excerpt from Dracula by Bram Stoker?
The answer is suspense.
Answer:
Suspension
Explanation:
Why does Poe most likely use a Raven to torment that narrator in this poem?
A. Ravens are considered birds of ill-omen.
B. Ravens are known to comfort those in need.
C. Ravens beautiful and magnificent.
D. Ravens are known birds that migrate.
The answer is A, in older times people greatly believed that ravens meant something bad was going to happen. In some places ravens were believed to be demons that have come to torment those that have done wrong.
Hope this helps!
A. Ravens are considered birds of ill-omen.
Read the excerpt below and answer the question. "No sight so sad as that of a naughty child," he began, "especially a naughty little girl. Do you know where the wicked go after death?" "They go to hell," was my ready and orthodox answer. "And what is hell? Can you tell me that?" "A pit full of fire." "And should you like to fall into that pit, and to be burning there for ever?" "No, sir." "What must you do to avoid it?" I deliberated a moment; my answer, when it did come, was objectionable: "I must keep in good health, and not die." Jane Eyre's naïvete is clearly revealed through _____. Select all that apply. her limited understanding of religious doctrine her very literal interpretation of Mr. Brocklehurst's question Mr. Brocklehurst's belief that she is "naughty" and "wicked" Mr. Brocklehurst's impatience with her behavior
Jane Eyre's naivety is exposed through her simplistic understanding of religious doctrine and her straightforward interpretation of Mr. Brocklehurst's questions which stems from her innocent and honest character.
Explanation:Jane Eyre's naivety is clearly revealed through her limited understanding of religious doctrine and her very literal interpretation of Mr. Brocklehurst's question. The exchange between Jane and Mr. Brocklehurst not only highlights Jane's innocence but also demonstrates her honest and blunt character. This, combined with her lack of comprehensive knowledge of religious teachings, results in her simple and direct response to the complex concept of sin and its repercussions. Her statement, 'I must keep in good health, and not die', to the question about avoiding hell, is a perfect example of her literal interpretation and it suggests her limited understanding of religious doctrine.
Learn more about Jane Eyre's Naivety here:https://brainly.com/question/27988761
#SPJ3
what do the similes in have in common?
https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/46548/harlem
The comparision of dreams and things that perish is that if one has a project in life (dream) and postponesit for whatever reason (deferred) the opportunity and will to take up the challenge might die or dim.
The similes in the poem all have in common that they are related to decay and unpleasantness.
What are the common themes in the similes ?The first simile compares a deferred dream to a raisin in the sun, which suggests that it will shrivel up and become useless. The second simile compares a deferred dream to a sore that festers and runs, which suggests that it will become infected and painful.
The third simile compares a deferred dream to rotten meat, which suggests that it will become smelly and disgusting. The fourth simile compares a deferred dream to something that crusts and sugars over, which suggests that it will become hard and inedible.
Find out more on similes at https://brainly.com/question/24543232
#SPJ3
Detailed information about the life of a person written by that same person which identifies the type of informational text that includes this content?
Identify the adverb clause and the word or words it modifies. The artwork was displayed after the artist had unveiled it. Adverb clause: Word(s) modified:
Adverb Clause: (when) after the artist unveiled it.
Words modified:(verb) was displayed.
The answer to your question would be that the adverb clause identified is the following one "after the artist had unveiled it" and the words it modifies are "was displayed".
An adverb clause is a group of words that function as an adverb in a sentence. Adverbs give more information about how an action was performed, that is, they answer questions like how, why, where, and when. In this case, the adverb clause gives information regarding when the artwork was displayed and it has been introduced by the subordinating conjunction "after".
review the conflict perseus tell the king that he should ask for medusa's head and the king surprises perseus by taking his suggestion. which best analyzes how this conflict develops the plot?
The conflict develops the plot by building suspense about whether Perseus would succeed in killing Medusa.
Perseus did not expect to be sent on such a dangerous task, but because the king wants Danae, he needs Perseus out of the way, ultimately sending Perseus on a suicide mission.
Although the options are not included with the question, we can still look at how this conflict develops the plot.
The king is in love with Perseus' mother, Danae, but Perseus does not think he is worthy of her. I order to get him out of the way, the king asks Perseus for the head of Medusa. He is only using this as a ploy to get his mother. The conflict enhances the excitement of the story and develops the plot, as it makes the reader wonder whether Perseus will be able to achieve this feat.
1. Choose the one with proper subject-verb agreement.
A. The student (as well as the teacher) want to go to the museum.
B. The student as well as the teacher want to go to the museum.
C. The student and teacher wants to go to the museum.
D. The student as well as the teacher wants to go to the museum.
2. Choose the one with proper subject-verb agreement.
A. A group of young people were hanging around on the corner of the street.
B. On our street is many tall trees.
C. Neither of the men are here yet.
D. Sixty days is not enough time to complete the project.
3. Choose the one with correct pronoun agreement.
A. A child can increase his self-confidence greatly by participating in physical activity.
B. If any one of the sisters needs a ride, they can call me.
C. If someone goes through school studying only science, they will complete only part of their education.
D. The Washington team was opportunistic; they took advantage of every break.
4. Choose the one with correct pronoun agreement.
A. Both of the women have made her opinions known.
B. Each of these companies had their books audited.
C. If the board of directors controls the company, they may vote for a raise.
D. When someone has been drinking, he or she may drive poorly.
5. Choose the one with correct pronoun agreement.
A. All of the students turned in his or her research paper on time.
B.Every one of the actresses knows their part by heart.
C. Neither the pilot nor the attendants gave their opinion about the mishap.
D. Teachers can create podcasts for each child, helping them learn how to work in groups as well as plan their own project.
Answer:
we not ansr u test
Explanation:
1. B. The student as well as the teacher want to go to the museum.
2.D. Sixty days is not enough time to complete the project.
3. A. A child can increase his self-confidence greatly by participating in physical activity.
4.D. When someone has been drinking, he or she may drive poorly.
5.D. Teachers can create podcasts for each child, helping them learn how to work in groups as well as plan their own projects.
Subject-verb and pronoun agreement are important aspects of grammar that ensure clarity and grammatical correctness in sentences. In the first set, option B is correct because it maintains a subject-verb agreement with the plural noun "student" and the plural verb "want."
In the second set, option D is the correct choice as it uses the singular verb "is" to agree with the singular noun phrase "Sixty days." Moving on to pronoun agreement, in the third set, option A is correct as it uses the masculine pronoun "his" to agree with the masculine noun "child."
In the fourth set, option D is correct as it uses the gender-neutral pronouns "he or she" to maintain agreement with the singular noun "someone."
Lastly, in the fifth set, option D is correct as it uses the plural pronoun "them" to agree with the plural noun "teachers."
Therefore 1. Option B; 2.Option D 3.Option A; 4.Option D; and 5Option D.
Learn more about subject-verb agreement here
https://brainly.com/question/30491015
#SPJ4
Study the timeline of Russian history, and read the passage from chapter 1 of Animal Farm.
"But is this simply part of the order of Nature? Is it because this land of ours is so poor that it cannot afford a decent life to those who dwell upon it? No, comrades, a thousand times no! The soil of England is fertile, its climate is good, it is capable of affording food in abundance to an enormously greater number of animals than now inhabit it. This single farm of ours would support a dozen horses, twenty cows, hundreds of sheep—and all of them living in a comfort and a dignity that are now almost beyond our imagining."
Which event in Russian history does the sentiment of this passage most point to?
the crowning of Nicholas II, and the bourgeois’ enjoyment of luxuries
the start of World War I, and Russia’s hopes of benefitting from it
the beginning of collectivization, and the idea that all should share in wealth
the Soviet famine, in which so many people died due to poorly planned policies
The answer is the third answer:
"the beginning of collectivization, and the idea that all should share in wealth."
The pigs say that the soil of England is fertile and that the farm could support a bigger number of animals that inhabit the farm now. They also say that all of the animals could live in comfort.
Hope this helps!
The feeling that this passage provides can be associated with the beginning of collectivization and the idea that everyone must share wealth, as shown in the third answer option.
We can arrive at this answer because:
In the excerpt shown in the question above, the pigs are showing how the place where they are is full of resources, where all the animals could live in comfort, working together and sharing what they have.This speech can be associated with the beginning of the collectivization that took place in the Soviet Union.That's because collectivization preached the sharing of resources, where all citizens shared with their peers the resources they had.According to Russian rulers, this would be a very promising idea, as Russia was full of resources.Thus, if all Russians worked and shared what they had, no one would lack anything and everyone would live comfortably.However, collectivization did not fulfill these goals, as didn't the ideas of the pigs in "Animal Farm."
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/2737201?referrer=searchResults
Hamlet - Act 3 Scene 3 and 4
--------------------------------------
1. What warnings about the “cease of majesty” does Rosencrantz explain to Claudius? How is this both foreshadowing and the outcome of an event of the past? (pg. 186)
2. Claudius admits his guilt (to us and to himself): What is the “primal eldest curse” he speaks of? Why can’t Claudius ask for forgiveness from God? (pg. 188)
3. Why doesn’t Hamlet kill Claudius? (pg. 192)
4. Read the scene between Hamlet and Gertrude: Note how her lines “ these words like daggers into my ears” relates to how Hamlet’s father was killed. Why does the Ghost appear when it happens? How is it’s sudden appearance different from its appearance in Act 1, and What does this difference suggest? What is it’s message to Hamlet? (pg. 202)
5. What is Gertrude’s agreement with Hamlet? (pg. 202)
1- Rosencrantz explains that when a king dies he does not die alone.He compares the public figure with a wheel on a mountain .When the wheel falls it makes everything go down with it.It is a foreshadowing because it shows that the death of King Hamlet is already " acting like a gulf.." as with his own son.Prince Hamlet is giving signs of distress which affect the new king, his mother and the whole kingdom.It is the outcome of an event in the past because everything that is happening around Claudius has been originated by himself and his killing of his brother.
2-The primal eldest cause he speaks of is the death of Abel in the hands of his brother Cain..."A brother´s murder.."He cannot ask for forgiveness as he feels too guilty to do so.
3- Hamlet does not kill Claudius because he is praying.If Hamlet kills him while praying, as Christian people beleive, he will die and go to Heaven and he does not deserve eternal peace.
4-The lines relate to how king Hamlet was killed because Claudius put poison in his ear as he was sleeping.The words Hamlet utters are full of poison for Caudius and for herself, his mother.The appearance of the Ghost this time has a double meaning. He has warned Hamlet that the mother is innocent so he might be here in order to remind his son of that, to ask him to intercede with her and also because he wants his son to carry out his revenge. Hamlet gets the message that he has to go on with the revenge but would have liked some confirmation from the mother that Clauduis has murdered his father.He seems to need the mother on his side.
5-Gertrude is told by Hamlet that he has been pretendng to be mad.He wants her to hide that from Caudius, that she knows now what is going onwith her son. She agrees.He demands that his mother avoids being alone with his uncle, too.
In 'Hamlet,' Rosencrantz's warning to Claudius foreshadows future consequences and reflects past events, while Claudius cannot seek forgiveness for his guilt due to the benefits he gains from his sin. Hamlet spares Claudius to avoid granting him heaven, and the Ghost appears to remind Hamlet of his duty, revealing internal conflicts. Gertrude agrees to keep Hamlet's feigned madness a secret.
In Hamlet, Act 3 Scene 3, Rosencrantz warns Claudius about the consequences of the king's actions, which is a form of foreshadowing and also reflects events from the past, particularly the murder of King Hamlet. Claudius acknowledges his guilt in a soliloquy, referring to the "primal eldest curse," involving the biblical story of Cain and Abel, indicating his inner turmoil and inability to seek forgiveness as he still benefits from his sin. Hamlet refrains from killing Claudius in this scene, as he believes Claudius is praying and does not want to send his soul to heaven.
The intense confrontation between Hamlet and Gertrude in Act 3 Scene 4 results in Gertrude exclaiming that Hamlet's words are like daggers, which parallels the poisoning of King Hamlet's ears. The Ghost's appearance during this scene differs from Act 1 because it now seems to serve the purpose of reminding Hamlet of his duty to avenge his father rather than to spur him to action against Gertrude. The difference suggests an internal conflict within Hamlet, as the Ghost does not interact with Gertrude, indicating that she might not see it, thus implying the potential question of Hamlet's sanity or the nature of the Ghost.
Gertrude's agreement with Hamlet is to keep his secret of feigned madness, as Hamlet has convinced her of Claudius's guilt in the murder of his father.
John used 1 3\4 kg of salt to melt the ice on his sidewalk. He then used another 34\5 kg on the driveway.If he originally bought 10 kg of salt, how much does he have left.
0 kg
13/4 = 3.25
34/5 = 6.80
3.25 + 6.80 = 10.05 kg
Which statement correctly compares Steve's journal entry and the screenplay in Monster?
The journal relays objective facts and details of the setting. The screenplay describes Steve's personal reaction to the trial.
The journal includes Steve's plan to prove his innocence. The screenplay includes Steve's view of the people he is accused of committing a crime with.
The journal includes Steve writing about himself in the first person. The screenplay includes Steve writing about himself in the third person.
The journal tells what the people around Steve are saying and doing. The screenplay relays Steve's inner thoughts and fears.
Answer: I believe the answer is C- The journal includes Steve writing about himself in the first person the screenplay include Steve writing about himself in the third person. Please tell me if I’m wrong.
Explanation:
The journal includes Steve writing about himself in the first person. The screenplay includes Steve writing about himself in the third person is the statement correctly compares Steve's journal entry and the screenplay in Monster. Hence, option C is correct.
What is third person?A collection of grammatical devices that refer to someone who is neither the author or speaker of the speech in which they appear nor the intended audience for that utterance. The pronoun "they" is used in the third person.
The first, second, and third person are all used to convey points of view. First person is used in the I/we perspective. You are assuming a second-person perspective. Third person, he/she/it/they perspective.
Examples of third-person pronouns are he, she, it, his, her, it; himself, herself, itself; they; them; their; and themselves. The third person is acceptable when referring to other persons by name. Smith has a different viewpoint, for instance. His analysis shows that previous claims about the topic are untrue.
Thus, option C is correct.
For more information about third person, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/4205453
#SPJ6
In at least one hundred words, compare and contrast Rukmani’s voice in Nectar in a Sieve with Gandhi’s voice in “Gandhi Defends His Beliefs.” Consider how their points of view are similar, as well as how they differ.
Rukmani is a woman in India that faces many difficulties to raise a family. The dream of Ghandi was to conquer the independence of his country and in doing so he always advocated for peaceful means . Rukmany has this idea of making a living in a peaceful way, too. She was not so willing to ask for help. His friend Kenny who was a doctor that helped to have children kept saying that poor people should shout out loud when they needed help.
Ghandi started his fight for independence and in his speech he said that he deliberately wanted to do what he did and he didn't regret anything of what he did. In this aspect Ghandi was a little bit different than Rukmani because he saw the reality of his country and he thought about drawing the attention of the media and powerful people that can help in achieving his cause. Rukmani was more into making her family survive. She had to face many terrible situations but she didn't give up like when her daughter Ira became a prostitute and became pregnant or when the monsoon destroyed the harvest. Ghandi also faced many terrible situations and in his speech he stated that they were worthwhile if he could help his cause. In this aspect both characters are similar.
Rukmani’s voice in Nectar in a Sieve is personal and emotional, focusing on daily survival and family struggles. Gandhi’s voice in “Gandhi Defends His Beliefs” is philosophical and motivational, advocating for non-violent collective action. Both highlight resilience but differ in their scope and style.
Comparing and contrasting Rukmani’s voice in Nectar in a Sieve with Gandhi’s voice in “Gandhi Defends His Beliefs” reveals significant differences and similarities in their perspectives on life and struggle.
Rukmani’s voice is primarily a personal, emotional, and reflective one, focusing on the trials and tribulations of a common woman in rural India. Her narrative is centered around daily survival, family, and the intimate impacts of socioeconomic changes. For example, she often speaks about the personal toll of droughts, financial instability, and the loss of close family members, offering a deeply humanistic view of poverty and resilience.
In contrast, Gandhi’s voice in “Gandhi Defends His Beliefs” is idealistic, philosophical, and motivational. Gandhi addresses broader social and political issues, advocating for non-violence (ahimsa) and civil disobedience as methods for achieving social change. His speeches and writings emphasize the power of collective action and moral integrity, proposing non-violent resistance as not only a strategy but a way of life. For instance, in his speech he might say, “The weapon of ahimsa will lead us to our freedom,” focusing on inspiring his audience towards higher moral and ethical conduct.
Both voices, while differing in scope and style, reflect a deep commitment to resilience and improvement. Rukmani’s voice gives insight into personal and immediate survival, while Gandhi’s focus on overarching principles and collective well-being. Their points of view align in their advocacy for perseverance and moral strength in the face of adversity but diverge in their methods and audience focus.
Which is a compound sentence? A) His mother called to tell him about her impending divorce. B) When the weather is just right you can see the top of Paris Mountain. C) The printing press broke last night, so everyone's newspaper delivery was delayed. D) Although he knew better, John asked her out on a date, and she (surprisingly) said, "Yes!" Submit
c) The printing press broke last night, so everyone's newspaper delivery was delayed.
Which of these endings will NOT create parallel structure for the following sentence stem?
He was running, jumping, and
hiding behind bushes.
sliding under fences.
climbed a tall tree.
singing a song.
The answer is C - climbed a tall tree. All of the other answers end with the same tense that is used in the beginning portion of the sentence. The answer would be the "climbed a tall tree" because it does not match the tenses used in the beginning of the sentence. Finish the sentence with each of your answer options and choose the one that sounds incorrect.
He was running, jumping, and climbed a tall tree.
How do you write a parallel structure?Parallel structure, or parallelism, means using the same pattern of words to show that two or more words or ideas are of equal importance. Words and phrases within a sentence should not only match in structure but also be intense.
What is an example of a parallel structure?My dog not only likes to play fetch but also chase cars. Parallel: My dog not only likes to play fetch, but he also likes to chase cars. My dog likes not only to play fetch but also to chase cars. When you connect two clauses or phrases with a word of comparison, such as than or as, use parallel structure.
Learn more about parallel structure here https://brainly.com/question/1397774
#SPJ2
According to the narrator of A Visit to Europe, which belief did the British hold about Indian marriages? A. Indian women held more power than their husbands. B. Indian men had hundreds of wives. C. Indian women disliked motherhood. D. Indian parents arranged loveless marriages for money.
The correct answer is B. Indian men had hundreds of wives.
Explanation:
In 1889, Mukharji wrote a book called "A Visit to Europe. He talks about the trip he had in England in the year 1886. There was a scene where he was at the restaurant talking about 250 wives he had.
Answer:
Indian men were barbarians in their relationships
Explanation: For Apex Students
21- (short answer) “The Rhinoceros” is what we call absurd fiction. What are some things in this story that seemed absurd? (use the help notes from lessons 4 and 5 to help you. All help notes are on the message board) *
In "The Rhinoceros" people start seeing Rhinos in the street. People begin changing into rhinos and our main character feels pressure to do the same. He is determined not to conform just because everyone else is doing it.
Do you need the analysis of it? I have found the short instroduction that might be helpful for you. Berenger is in his room asleep and having a nightmare. Dudard comes to visit him, but Berenger does not recognize his voice. Berenger is paranoid that his voice may be changing and that may be turning into a rhinoceros, but Dudard assures him that he is normal. They discuss Jean, but Dudard seems unsurprised. He chides Berenger, "you mustn't dramatize the situation," and tells him, "try not to think about it." Please, make sure you check more at Prime Writings site. They are super good at completing your tasks.
What is the central idea of the "Allegory of the Cave"? A. Most men live chained to the wall of a cave all of their lives, facing a blank wall, and trying to guess the nature of objects reflected by a fire. B. A philosopher is like a prisoner freed from the cave that comes to understand that the shadows are not reality, rather he understands reality by his experience. C. Men who allow their experience to be shaped by perceptions and shadows do not know a better life. D. A philosopher must return to share the news of enlightenment with others who will not necessarily accept his good news. Part
The central idea of the Allegory of the Cave combines four main concepts: the unenlightened state of most people, the philosopher's journey to understanding, the limitations of humans bound by perceptions, and the philosopher's duty to share their enlightenment.
Explanation:The central idea of the Allegory of the Cave, a philosophical text by Plato, is not isolated to a singular concept but rather a combination of four main ideas represented in options A, B, C, and D. Each plays a vital part in understanding the text.
A) Represents the condition of most people, living without an understanding of true reality, only knowing shadows which they perceive as reality.
B) Describes the journey of the philosopher, who, like a freed prisoner, learns to understand true reality, not just the shadows.
C) Centers on the limitation of humans who let their lives be shaped purely by their perceptions, without knowing reality.
D) Depicts the duty of the philosopher—enlightened about the true nature of reality—to return to the cave and share this understanding with others, even if they may not believe.
Learn more about Allegory of the Cave here:https://brainly.com/question/30563846
#SPJ6
URGENT! PLEASE HELP! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT!!!
Summarize how you use context clues, sentence analysis, and syntax to understand complex content. Be specific.
Let’s do this by parts.
And also let’s start with CONTEXT CLUES. You can use this methodology with this helpful structure that I found (attached). And it works this way:
• You use the WORD part to understand deeply the meaning of the word and you do it by breaking down the parts of the word and looking for the definition of each part.
• You use the DEFINITION part to find the meaning of the word within the sentence.
• You use the SYNONYM part to have different words that have the same meaning and you might know.
• You use the EXAMPLE part to give you some clues about the meaning of the word.
SENTENCE ANALYSIS. It consist of breaking down the sentence and identify each word of it whether if it is a verb, a noun, a compound noun, subject, a conjunction, subordinating conjunction and others. You do to understand the reason why it is used in the sentence and what the sentence means.
SYNTAX. To analyze this you need to unit the words to form sentences and to express concepts.
When trying to understand complex content, the most important thing is to break it down into smaller pieces that can be comprehended separately:
Context clues give the reader an idea, like the name suggests, of the context in which a certain topic is being discussed or examined: the point of view of the author, the cultural or scientific background, the general setting...Sentence analysis helps to break down the information further, by cutting it into smaller bits that can be more easily researched or understood. It also helps to understand the author more, through the way that they compose the text, as it hints their background and/or stance on the subject.Syntax, which in general terms is the way that words are put to form phrases, it's really important because it defines the meaning of a sentence, and helps to interpret what is being said without ambiguity.Combining all these elements is a good strategy to break down a complex test, in order to research what is less understood and make sense of the whole content.
The secretive, fragmented journal entries used to allow the narrator to tell her story could symbolize
Select one:
a. the sister-in-law’s meddling behavior with regard to the narrator’s illness.
b. the husband’s oppressive behavior toward the narrator.
c. the way the narrator “creeps” around at the end of the story.
d. the increasing fragmentation of the narrator’s sense of self.
I would say D.
because the narrator is telling her story.
Answer: d. the increasing fragmentation of the narrator’s sense of self.
The fragmented journal entries most likely symbolize the increasing fragmentation of the narrator's sense of self. As the narrator has been locked for so long, with no other outlet than that of her journal, this is likely to be the best account of how the narrator feels about her situation. As the journal becomes more fragmented, we can assume that the author becomes more confused about herself. We know that she is deprived of interaction with the world or intellectual stimulation. This forces her to lose her sense of self, and in time, her sanity.
Select all that apply. You suspect that this article has left out some facts that might lead the reader to believe that someone else made the Star-Spangled Banner. What is the best way to verify this?
The best way to verify if these facts were left out is to check the articles' sources. Read through sources to see if any of them mention that the star spangled banner might have been made by someone else. If nothing appears in these sources, further researching can verify it. Use scholarly sources, such as articles published by the government or peer reviewed studies, to research further.