the kind of authority a king had over citizens

The major advantages of the monoply market are B). Consumers have no protection from poor quality or high prices and C). Taxes become higher.

Monopoly refers to the market situation where there is a single seller in the market. It is a type of market, in which a single seller or producer assumes a dominant position in an industry or a sector.

In monoploy, consumers are charged with a higher price than in a more competitive market, there is restrictions on the entry of new firm. It restricts the choice of the consumers and can harm the consumer interests as well.

The company in the monopoly enjoys so many benefits because there is no suitable competition to encourage lower prices or better-quality offerings. In a monopoly, a single supplier controls the entire supply of a product and creates a rigid demand curve.

Learn more about monopoly here:-

https://brainly.com/question/5992626

#SPJ5

The theory is that the Roanoke settlers integrated with the Croatoan tribe after John White found the deserted settlement with the word "Croatoan" carved into a tree, indicating they moved there.

Theory on the Fate of Roanoke Settlers

One theory to explain what happened to the settlers at Roanoke revolves around the settlers integrating with the Croatoan tribe. When John White, the governor of the colony, returned to Roanoke in 1590 after an extended absence, he found the settlement abandoned with no sign of struggle, just the word "Croatoan" carved into a tree. This led to speculation that the settlers moved to live with the Croatoan tribe, possibly due to lack of supplies or other hardships. Despite the attempts by White and later explorers to locate them, their fate remained a mystery after White's return to England and still intrigues historians to this day.

Whip is the answer I did it on USATestPrep                                        

Answer & Explanation: Tax cuts hurt the stability of the empire. Disease and their unableness to keep control of the public also contributed to there decline.

The answer is D. Baron Von Steben

Answer:

A. Charge people money to see the frog

Explanation:

Magical realism, also called fabulism, often contains critiques about the human or societal behavior. As the question says itself: "in a magical realistic story usually stay stuck in the troubling part of human existence". Chances are, the character that finds the frog will use it to his or her own personal gain. The only option that fits this idea is option A.

This appears to be a question in which you are asked to express your view. Form your opinion about the exam system and what it was used for in history and ancient dynasties/civilizations.

A system is a group of moving or interrelated elements that act according to a set of rules to form a unified whole. A system, surrounded and influenced by its situation, is described by its boundaries, structure, and function and shown in its functioning.

Systems are the subjects of study of systems theory and other schemes sciences. I believe the examination system is effective because it serves as a foundation for civil servants who will work in state administration. They will develop experience and knowledge in that field as a result of their training.

Therefore, I believe the examination system is effective because it serves as a foundation for civil servants who will work in state administration

Learn more about the system here:

https://brainly.com/question/19843453

#SPJ2

Answer:

American voters can bring about changes in their government by making sure they vote during elections and also contact elected officials on laws and policy they will like to be changed, they can also engage in peaceful protest and petition elected officials. when the elected officials  propose or implement policies not good enough  

Explanation:

An American  voter is someone who votes or has the right to vote in an American election

The correct answers are A) They executed their rivals by cutting off their heads and D) They threatened their rivals with war.

The statements that describe a method kings and queens of northern Europe used to gain power were "They executed their rivals by cutting off their heads and they threatened their rivals with war."

Northern European monarchies were so interested in not only maintain their wealthiness but on increasing it. They always had imperialistic intentions and aimed to invade and conquer territories to increase their power and dominion. Kings and queens did not hesitate to wage war with other nations and kill and destroy towns in order to capture the land. Once they conquered new lands they jailed its former rulers or cut their heads to show their power and send a message to other rulers.

Kings and queens in northern Europe often gained power by marrying into other powerful royal families, threatening or waging war, and bribing rivals with land. Executions and Olympic competitions were not standard methods for consolidating power in this historical context.

The method that kings and queens of northern Europe used to gain power included various strategies. Primarily, they fostered alliances through marriage with royalty from other powerful lands, which is described in the given options as B - They married royalty from other powerful lands. Another common method was by threatening or actually engaging in military actions to coerce or undermine their rivals, as suggested in D - They threatened their rivals with war. Additionally, they might offer bribes or rewards, such as land, to secure the loyalty or neutrality of potential adversaries, aligning with C - They bribed their rivals with land. Executions and Olympic competitions were not typical measures for consolidating power in this context.

Historical accounts and practices reflected these methods across different regions and eras. For instance, intermarriage was a common diplomatic practice across various empires, used to strengthen alliances and avoid military conflicts. This is seen in the mutually beneficial arrangement of marriages between royal families of allied states, among others. Additionally, powerful states or empires would often control trade and enforce their economic might as seen in the Kingdom of Dahomey's management of the slave trade or how a canny leader would control trade routes. War was sedulously avoided through such diplomacy and economic dominance if feasible.

Day of Infamy is Walter Lord's gripping, vivid re-creation of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on Sunday, December 7, 1941. In brilliant detail Walter Lord traces the human drama of the great attack: the spies behind it; the Japanese pilots; the crews on the stricken warships; the men at the airfields and the bases; the Japanese pilot who captured an island single-handedly when he could not get back to his carrier; the generals, the sailors, the housewives, and the children who responded to the attack with anger, numbness, and magnificent courage.

In compiling his masterpiece, Lord traveled over fourteen thousand miles and spoke or corresponded with over five hundred individuals on both sides who were there, creating the best account we have of one of the epic events in American history.

hope this helps other people. btw this is not in my own words, i just wanted to help people who need this question answered. peace

The 'date of infamy' refers to the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor by Japan on December 7th, 1941, which led to the U.S. entering World War II. President Roosevelt's speech to Congress declared the act as premeditated aggression, rallying American support for war. It's an enduring statement marking America's resolve and sacrifice.

Date of Infamy

The term 'a date which will live in infamy' refers to the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941, as described by President Franklin D. Roosevelt during his speech to Congress. This surprise attack by the Empire of Japan against the United States led to significant American casualties and the destruction of naval and military resources at the Pearl Harbor naval base. In response, President Roosevelt addressed the nation and Congress, condemning the attack as premeditated and dastardly, and called for a declaration of war against Japan, which Congress granted. This pivotal moment marked the entry of the United States into World War II, as Germany and Italy subsequently declared war on the U.S., aligning with their Japanese allies.

President Roosevelt's speech emphasized the severity and treachery of the attack, which occurred without a formal declaration of war and while peace negotiations were still ongoing in Washington. The speech eloquently rallied the American people and solidified their resolve to enter the war. The phrase "a date which will live in infamy" has since become a landmark statement in American history, symbolizing the nation's shock, sacrifice, and eventual unity in the face of aggression. The Pearl Harbor attack is commemorated annually, honoring the victims and reflecting on the event's historical significance.

Answer:

could change protein shape

might be neutral

might be harmful

might be beneficial

Explanation:

Could change protein shape, might be neutral, might be harmful and might be beneficial are effects do mutations have. Hence, options A, C, E and F are correct.

A mutation is a modification to the DNA sequence of an organism. Mutations can result through viral infection, errors in DNA replication during cell division, and exposure to mutagens.

Germline mutations occur in gametes. Somatic mutations can occur in other body cells. Chromosome alterations refer to mutations that alter the chromosome's physical composition. Point mutations change a single nucleotide.

The effects of mutation could be positive, negative, or neutral depending on the circumstance or region. Most non-neutral mutations are detrimental. With each additional base pair that a mutation alters, the effect and likelihood that the mutation will be deleterious rises.

Thus, options A, C, E and F are correct.

For more details about mutations, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13923224

#SPJ6

The correct answer is C) The North remained segregated by habit, not by law.

The statement about race relations in the North and South after Reconstruction that is true is "The North remained segregated by habit, not by law."

After the Civil War, the United States government had officially ended slavery in the country. President Abraham Lincoln tried to reintegrate the Southern States to the Union during the Reconstruction period, but his anxiety to do it quickly allowed the Southern States leeway to do Reconstruction in their own terms. In the North, where many people had supported abolitionism before the Civil War, they were more receptive to integrate black people in society, although the process was not as easy as in theory it should have happened.

C. Battle of chickamauga

Answer:

Three ways in which they were alike:

Three ways in which they were different: