"The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) is one of the most pivotal opinions ever rendered by that body. This landmark decision highlights the U.S. Supreme Court's role in affecting changes in national and social policy." Which statement accurately supports the view that the Supreme Court affected national policy with its decision in Brown v. Board of Education?
A) The Supreme Court ruling legally ended unequal funding in America's public schools.
B) The Supreme Court ruling legally ended racial segregation in America's public schools.
C) The Supreme Court ruling legally ended gender discrimination in America's public schools.
D) The Supreme Court ruling legally ended the use of affirmative action in America's public schools

The Treaty of Versailles imposed several terms on Germany, including military restrictions and war indemnity. It also caused feelings of dishonor and vulnerability.

The Treaty of Versailles imposed several terms that specifically affected Germany. One of the most significant terms was the restriction on Germany's military capacity. The German Army was limited to 100,000 troops, and the production and possession of various military equipment were curtailed. Another important term was the "war guilt" clause, which blamed Germany for starting the war, causing feelings of dishonor and imposing harsh monetary reparations on the country. Additionally, the treaty required Germany to disarm, leading to a significant blow to German pride and a sense of vulnerability.

https://brainly.com/question/6704005

#SPJ6

Answer:

Roosevelt said that the US would prevent Latin American countries from illegal actions.

Explanation:

The correct answer is A). Slavery.

Enacted on July 13, 1787, The Ordinance was an act of the Congress of the Confederation of the U. S. that created the first organized region of the U. S.: the Northwest Territory. The ordinance prohibited slavery and included a fugitive slave clause although there was a servant agreement law that permitted anti-abolitionist to have slaves but could not be bought or sold.

The prohibition of slavery in this region helped to establish the Ohio River as the boundary between abolitionist and anti-abolitionist territories, between the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River.

Answer:

13 Colonies

New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York,

New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina,

South Carolina and Georgia: They fought for the British.

Final answer:

Settlers in the original 13 colonies generally supported Great Britain during the French and Indian War, which was influenced by land disputes and was intertwined with Native American alliances.

Explanation:

During the French and Indian War, also known as the Seven Years' War, the settlers of the original 13 colonies primarily supported Great Britain. The conflict was a result of increasing tensions over colonial land and influence, particularly in the Ohio River Valley. George Washington's defeat at Fort Necessity marked the beginning of hostilities that would escalate into a full-scale war. The war was not only between the French and the British but also involved various Native American tribes who aligned with both sides for strategic purposes. The Iroquois tribes, for example, sided with the British due to long-standing enmities with the Huron tribes, who aligned with the French. Through the course of the war, the British colonists hoped for greater access to western territories for settlement post-war, a desire that would eventually lead to conflict with the Crown over tighter controls and revenue measures enforced after the war's end.

Answer:

poland

Explanation:

Answer: C - Violated the right to privacy

They could support larger populations.

They became more settled

They made more decoritve pottery

They made more decorative pottery.

Industrialism had changed the United States. Americans began to view their nation with increasing nationalism. The spirit if expansion and imperialism was fueled by these feelings. For one hundred years America had taken a back seat to the traditional European powers, that many American felt, should change.

In order for America to take its rightful place amongst the worlds power many felt we needed to control a vast imperial empire. This empire would provide a market for our goods, raw materials for our factories and protection for our commercial interests. The expansion was, as previously discussed, justified by the need for our people to expand commercially and the social Darwinist idea of the white man's burden. With this need in mind eyes turned towards Spain. Spain, a once mighty empire, still with vast colonial holdings many of them in our Caribbean backyard, was now a much weaker nation than us. They were ripe for the picking and a their imperial holdings would be the spoils of victory.

Federalists ideology is also known as nationalist. In 1787, Federalists were active in making the new Constitution of U.S .That gives more strengthened to the national government over states and people.

The Antifederalists did not agree to the ratify of the US Constitution. They had to opposed the ratification at each convention of state. Because they are less organized compared to the federalists.

Example: They force first congress to create a bill of rights to give surety for liberties that was missing in the constitution.
Federalists was believed that only constitution was sufficient to protect the rights of citizens but antifederalist believed bill of right is also necessary.
Belief of federalists was more persuasive because they supported the strong central government. It provide government more power and ability to take decisions.

Some of the most persuasive arguments for the Constitution in the Federalist Papers included the idea of a stronger and more centralized government, the need for a balanced government with a separation of powers, and the promise of protection for individual liberties through a Bill of Rights.

One of the most persuasive arguments for the Constitution in the Federalist Papers was the idea that it would provide for a stronger and more centralized government. This argument was presented in Federalist Paper No. 10, written by James Madison, where he argued that a large republic would be better able to control factions and prevent tyranny than a small republic. Madison explained that in a large republic, there would be a greater diversity of interests and opinions, which would help to mitigate the power of any single faction.

Another persuasive argument was the need for a balanced government with a separation of powers. This was highlighted in Federalist Paper No. 47, written by James Madison, where he argued that a concentration of power in a single branch of government would lead to tyranny. Madison proposed a system of checks and balances, where the legislative, executive, and judicial branches would each have separate and distinct powers.

Additionally, the Federalist Papers argued that the Constitution would provide for the protection of individual liberties through the inclusion of a Bill of Rights. This was discussed in Federalist Paper No. 84, written by Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton acknowledged the concerns of those who believed that a Bill of Rights was necessary to safeguard individual freedoms and argued that the Constitution already contained provisions that protected these rights.

https://brainly.com/question/31778232

#SPJ12

In this case, it was Stated that the constitution implies a fundamental right to privacy. This decision was based on the Bill of Rights, even though the constitution doesn't mention "privacy" in itself, but considering that this was what was Stated, we can say that it was their interpretation that The Constitution forbids unreasonable Search and Seizure. Meaning the correct Answer is letter C.

Answer:

The correct answer is C. The idea in which the decision in Griswold v. Connecticut was based upon was that the Constitution forbids unreasonable search and seizure.

Explanation:

Griswold v. Connecticut was a landmark case in the United States in which the Supreme Court ruled that the US Constitution, through the Bill of Rights, protects the fundamental right to privacy from unreasonable search and seizure on the part of government.

The case involved the Connecticut Comstock Law, that barred people from using "any medicine, medical article or instrument intended to prevent conception." By 7-2, the Supreme Court overturned the law for violating the "right to marital privacy," laying the foundation for the right to privacy, regarding the methods and decisions that each couple intends to make regarding pregnancy prevention.

The correct answers are:

workers unions- to get at least a certain wage

labor strikes

labor laws

Workers were united in strikes and unions forming societies such as Journeymen Cordwainer’s union, United Tailoresses of New York, Mechanic’s Union of Trades Associations. United they would do strikes like the Boston House Carpenter’s Strike and the Philadelphia Carpenter’s Strike.

The Ten-Hour Movement began in 1835, they wanted shorter working hours and high wages. This made possible the Philadelphia General Strike in 1835.

The Emancipation Proclamation, issued on January 1, 1863, declared that all slaves in Confederate states were to be forever free, but did not immediately result in freedom as it depended on Union military victories, which is given in Option (d), making it the correct answer.

Answering the question regarding the true statement of the Emancipation Proclamation given the options, the correct answer is that it freed all slaves living in states that had seceded from the Union (option d). On January 1, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as a war measure during the American Civil War, declaring all slaves in Confederate territory to be forever free.

It's important to note that this did not immediately free all slaves. The Proclamation applied only to states that had seceded from the Union, leaving slavery untouched in the border states. It also exempted parts of the Confederacy that had already come under Northern control. Most importantly, the freedoms it promised depended on Union military victory.

The title given to the chief law officer of the state is Attorney General.  The Attorney General also has considerable authority in interpreting and enforcing state laws.

The chief law officer of the state is known as the Attorney General. This role involves representing the state in legal matters and providing legal advice to government officials.  

The title given to the chief law officer of the state is Attorney General. This position is primarily responsible for representing the state in legal matters, providing legal advice to the government, and ensuring that the state's laws are enforced. The Attorney General holds significant authority and is often involved in issuing opinions on the constitutionality of laws and administrative actions.

The long-term causes of the French Revolution were an economic crisis, social inequality, and the influence of Enlightenment ideas.

The long-term causes of the French Revolution can be attributed to a combination of social, economic, and political factors. Some of the key long-term causes include:

These long-term causes created a growing discontent among different segments of society, and the demands for political and social reforms eventually led to the French Revolution.

After the French Declaration, equality was not fully realized as women, enslaved individuals, and non-Europeans were excluded from the rights it proclaimed; only male citizens truly benefited.

The Declaration, influenced by the Enlightenment and the grievances of the French Revolution, asserted that "men are born and remain free and equal in rights" and aimed to establish equality before the law and other basic liberties. However, in practice, this equality was largely limited to male citizens. Women, enslaved people, and those who were not of European descent were generally excluded from the rights and privileges that the Declaration aimed to ensure. Social status and racial prejudice continued to play a significant role in determining one's effective rights and participation in government.

During the Napoleonic Era, the Declaration's principles of liberty and equality were further constrained and interpreted in ways that reinforced existing social hierarchies. Women's rights were largely ignored, and in the colonies, the abolition of slavery was not immediately realized, further demonstrating the selective application of these proclaimed rights. As a result, the revolutionary call for equality was not wholly fulfilled, and many segments of society remained disenfranchised.

The 'bundle of legal rights' pertains to property law and outlines the rights that accompany property ownership. Examples of these rights include the right to use, enjoy, sell, or restrict access to one's property. These rights can be limited under certain legal circumstances.

Learn more about Bundle of legal rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/33726028

#SPJ6

Answer:

I believe its d

Explanation:

Answer:    C. The Vedic

Explanation:  Hinduism is a polytheistic religion, it is considered to be one of the oldest religions in the world, and it has been in existence since 5000 years ago and perhaps more, of course not in today's form.  In Hinduism, there are customs of worship of sacred flora and fauna, which is considered to be a pre-Vedic tradition, also known as the Dravidian tradition. With the arrival of Aryans to the Indian peninsula from Persia, the tradition of Veda (or Vedic), somewhere between 2000 and 1200 BC has arrived. Scientists say that today's Hinduism is a fusion of pre-Vedic tradition, that is, the Dravidian tradition and traditions of the Aryans-the Vedic, as well as some other influences.

Buddhism originated from Hinduism in the fifth century BC, while Christianity was created approximately, after 33 AC, and Islam in the seventh century AC, which means that these three religions can not be the root from which Hinduism grew.

The part of the affordable care act that a total of 26 states challenged as well as texas is the expansion of the Medicaid. They had challenged to expand the Medicaid as a way of providing an option that may be of continuous and affordable for the people.