Type of government where states and a central government share power

Before the invasion of the Allies from the South to the Europe, they had to control the North Africa.

The involvement of the North African military in the world war, was very important for both Allies and Axis power.

The Axis power tried to stop the Allies from using the oil supplies and other resources of its empire in other countries.

So, the North Africa offered the Allies to gang up against the Axis power and destroyed the German and Italian troops.

Learn more about the invasion of the Allies here:-

https://brainly.com/question/849339

#SPJ2

Before invading Europe from the south, the Allies first had to control D) North Africa.

The correct answer to the question is that before they invaded Europe from the south, the Allies had to control D) North Africa.

After significant victories in North Africa in early 1943, including the push into Tunisia, the Allies aimed to weaken Axis powers by opening a southern front.

This led to the invasion of Italy, where they met strong German resistance but managed to make progress northward.

This strategic move forced Germany to allocate troops to Italy, reducing their presence on other fronts.

The Allies' success in North Africa was crucial for several reasons:

The Allied invasion of Italy began on the island of Sicily in July 1943, eventually leading to a broader campaign on the Italian mainland.

Despite initial surprises, German reinforcements slowed the Allied advance, making the campaign longer and more arduous than expected.

The correct answer is B) control the strategy of the party.

The leader of a political party in the legislative branch has the power to control the strategy of the party.

That is why it has the power, the faculties and is the leader of the party. They are representing the interests of the people who voted for them and most importantly, the interest of the citizens of the United States. So the leader of the party must have in mind the big responsibility it has when discussing, debating and voting for a new law. This leader has to establish a good strategy for the other members of its party to follow and present a common front during debates.

The other options were a) nominate various officials, c) select state and national judges and d) decide how members will vote.

The leader of a political party in the legislative branch, like the Speaker of the House or the Senate Majority Leader, exerts significant control over the legislative process, managing the floor business and guiding the party's political agenda. The party in government seeks to control its members, and during divided government, enacting policy agendas can be challenging. Leadership roles are powerful, setting committee chairs and controlling the legislative process.

Power of a Political Party Leader in the Legislative Branch

The leader of the political party in the legislative branch, such as the Speaker of the House in the House of Representatives or the Senate Majority Leader in the Senate, wields significant influence over the legislative process. The Speaker of the House, elected by the majority party, controls the floor business, makes parliamentary decisions, and can articulate and push the party's political agenda.

The Senate Majority Leader schedules and manages the Senate's business. These figures play pivotal roles in setting priorities, selecting committee chairs, and guiding bills through the legislative process, often using special rules to focus outcomes to their party's advantage.

In addition, the party in government, made up of organized partisans such as Democrats and Republicans in Congress, works to impose discipline on members and adhere to policy goals, although members' diverse constituencies can sometimes make this challenging. During periods of divided government, when the president and the majority of Congress are from different parties, the ability of the party leaders to enact their policy agendas can be complicated.

The institutional leadership roles, such as the Speaker and the Senate president pro tempore, are distinct in their functions—you have the Speaker being the business manager and decision-maker in the House, while the Vice President of the United States serves constitutionally as the Senate president—and can cast a vote in the event of a tie, which demonstrates the party leadership's significant control on the floor of each chamber.

Answer:

Explanation:

Answer Expert Verified The Greek and Roman idea of democracy had a substantial, lasting impact on the eventual American form on government. The Greek had established a direct democracy by which decisions were made.

The geographic advantages the Arabian peninsula possess is that the exterior and the interior parts of peninsula has great opportunities for agriculture .

Some of the other advantages that Arabian peninsula has are :

Thus , Arabian peninsula has a big coastal area where there are many geographic advantages .

For more information  related to arabian peninsula process ,  https://brainly.com/question/15106102?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

b. family road vacations

Explanation:

Answer:

B: Family Road Vacations

Explanation:

Source? Trust me bro

During the Warring States period, Daoism offered practical political alternatives such as governance methods through the Five Phases theory, contributing to unification efforts, and the influential concept of wuwei, suggesting limited government intervention. These principles, though in competition with Confucianism, were sometimes integrated, showing Daoism's adaptability in political thinking.

To understand the extent to which Daoists offered practical political alternatives during the period of the Warring States, one should consider various aspects. Firstly, Daoism contributed to governance through methods such as the Five Phases theory, encouraging a laissez-faire approach which influenced Emperor Wen's decisions on land and slave ownership, potentially destabilizing the small farmer class. The Daoist text Huainan zi compiled a vision of Daoist governance, suggesting an alternative way of ruling.

Additionally, Daoists were instrumental in unification efforts by serving as a bridge between social classes. The merging of Daoist principles with economics and science could have led to a distinctly different civilization, had it been the dominant approach over Confucianism. Furthermore, Daoism proposed the concept of wuwei (nonaction), promoting limited government intervention in the lives of people, which was an appealing political doctrine of its time.

Lastly, while Daoism often appeared in competition with other schools of thought like Confucianism, the two also borrowed from each other. This eclecticism shows the adaptability and potential of Daoist ideas to contribute meaningful alternatives to the period's political discourse.

Final answer:

The Massachusetts Bay Colony was more successful than Plymouth due to a larger population, focus on education and industry, and organized efforts to spread Christianity, ultimately leading to its economic prosperity and expansion.

Explanation:

The Massachusetts Bay Colony was more successful than Plymouth for several reasons. A larger exodus of Puritans, who settled the Massachusetts Bay Colony in the 1630s, resulted in a sizable and more diverse population, fostering a robust and prosperous community. In contrast, Plymouth remained relatively small. Education and industry were critical in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, driven by the Puritan belief that a thorough understanding of Scripture was necessary for church membership. This focus on education led to the establishment of schools and eventually Harvard College. Such educational infrastructure was not as common in Plymouth.

Furthermore, the Puritans of Massachusetts Bay also believed in idleness being a sin, which pushed them to develop various industries. This industrious nature, combined with the larger population, contributed to Massachusetts Bay's growth and economic prosperity, eventually absorbing Plymouth when it became a royal colony in 1691. The creation of Praying Towns and the pursuit of spreading Christianity to the local native populations also reflect the broader ambitions and organized efforts of the Massachusetts Bay settlers compared to those at Plymouth.