Why did josh want peak to be the youngest summit Everest?

Answer:

Protagonist. A protagonist is the leading character of a story, therefore that's your answer.

Explanation:

can i get bainlyist

Answer:

carictitezation

Explanation:

Onomatopoeia is the answer:)Goodluck!

Answer:

The correct answer is synecdoche.

Explanation:

Onomatopoeia is not the answer. Onomatopoeia refers to words that represent a sound by imitating it, such as bang, crash, click, buzz etc.

Synecdoche is a type of figurative language that uses a part of a whole to represent the whole. In the sentence we are analyzing here, the speaker mentions the ABC's. As we know, the ABC's refers to the alphabet. A, B, and C are the first three letters of the alphabet, which is constituted of 26 letters total. Therefore, when we say "ABC's", we are using a part - the first three letters - to refer to the whole - the complete alphabet with 26 letters. What we have is synecdoche.

It's basically poetry- or more explained, when the writer/poet puts rhymes in their sentences.

Answer:

Heavy use of rhyme

Explanation:

D) Some drunk drivers don't think much of their convictions, because they are often just given a "slap on the wrist."

The answer to this question is D.                                                                                                                                  

I'm pretty sure the answer is D, that is the only conflict that is internal (with emotions) and not external (with other people/society)

An example of an internal conflict in The Crucible is Elizabeth Proctor struggling to forgive her husband for having an affair.

The correct answer is D. Elizabeth Proctor struggles to forgive her husband for having an affair. This is an example of an internal conflict in The Crucible because it involves an emotional struggle within Elizabeth herself. She is torn between her love for her husband, John Proctor, and her hurt and betrayal over his affair with Abigail Williams.

This internal conflict is evident throughout the play as Elizabeth grapples with her feelings and ultimately must decide whether or not to forgive John and save his life.

Internal conflicts like this are important in literature because they add complexity to the characters and provide insight into their motivations and inner struggles.

https://brainly.com/question/29774093

#SPJ2

Students can fresh food that would more healthier for them and the local farmers can get money in return.

Answer:

The correct answer is A. which beauty of nature can't compensate for the existence of death.

Explanation:

To understand the message given by the author, it is necessary to understand the time and the situation in which the poen was written. It was after the World War that the writer composed this poem and she shows anger and sadness, she expresses that nature is beautiful, but the horror of the war is unavoidable. The poem exalts this feeling of terror by talking about the new life of spring in a way that brings up the ideas of violence and death.

D.) Instinct is an important part of survival

The dog represents pure instinct, a trait necessary for survival in the extremely cold Yukon at this time of year.  ("But the dog knew; all its ancestry knew, and it had inherited the knowledge. ")

The man never uses instinct, which would inform him without thinking that certain actions are dangerous while others are absolutely necessary for survival. The reason the man never uses instinct is explained in this sentence: "Possibly all the generations of his ancestry had been ignorant of cold, of real cold, of cold one hundred and seven degrees below freezing-point."

The correct option is definitely D. Instinct is an important part of survival.

None of the exemplified words changed while addind to them. Maybe for " nervous" an "e" was lost ( nerve-nervous)

The correct answer is C: Jem

Jem is considered one of the major characters of To Kill a Mockingbird, he is the older brother of Scout, narrator of the novel.

At the beginning of the novel Jem is 12 years old, and very close to Scout, but as the novel progresses he gets closer to his adolescence he identifies more with the adults.

Answer:

C: Jem

Explanation:

Jem is one of the leading characters in the novel. Jem is the older brother of Scout, who is the narrator of the story, and he is, from the beginning, a great influence in Scout's life, and the closest person to her. In fact, the novel begins with Scout describing the accident that Jem had when he was was nearly thirteen and analyzing the events leading to that accident.

a is the answer hope i help you

what is the question?

C is the correct answer.

Final answer:

The best paraphrase of the given lines is that love cannot heal physical ailments or injuries, encapsulating love's emotional depth but its inability to intervene in matters of physical health.

Explanation:

The best paraphrase of the lines 'Love can not fill the thickened lung with breath, Nor clean the blood, nor set the fractured bone' from the sonnet is C) Love cannot heal someone who is sick or physically hurt. This paraphrase accurately reflects the limitations of love in the context of physical ailments, as described in the lines. The sonnet explores the idea that while love is a powerful and profound emotion, it does not have the capability to remedy physical injuries or cure illnesses.

A!

Principal- Head teacher

Principle- belief/ideas/concepts

They are the wrong way around

It should be:

The principal of the school makes decisions based on his principles.

Answer:

A

Explanation

principle=a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behaviour or for a chain of reasoning.

Principal= a chief or head, particularly of a school.

If I helped, please mark as brainliest

In Act II, Scene III, of Romeo and Juliet, Romeo visits Friar Lawrence and declares his love for Juliet. He then asks the Friar if he will marry them:

I’ll tell thee as we pass, but this I pray:

That thou consent to marry us today.

The Friar is shocked that Romeo wants to marry Juliet because he claimed to be madly in love with Rosaline, a silent character in the play. In fact, Romeo was quite love-sick and it was the Friar who tried to convince Romeo to let Rosaline go because she did not reciprocate his feelings. The Friar then goes on to scold Romeo because he did not want him to abandon his love for Rosaline only to go on to fall in love with another woman. However, when he realizes that Romeo is serious about Juliet and that she reciprocates his feelings, he agrees to marry them. He also recognizes that this marriage is an opportunity for the two warring families to be reconciled:

For this alliance may so happy prove

To turn your households' rancor to pure love

Final answer:

The climax in 'Romeo and Juliet' is when Romeo takes his life, mistaking Juliet's temporary sleep for death, while adaptations of the play can vary in presentation and length.

Explanation:

As part of an examination of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, we focus on the concept of the climax within the narrative. The climax of a play like Romeo and Juliet occurs during a pivotal moment, specifically when Romeo, unaware that Juliet is only asleep, decides to take his own life. This moment occurs as Juliet lies in the tomb, and the dramatic tension is at its peak because the audience is aware of the tragic misunderstanding. Once Romeo dies and Juliet awakens to find him deceased, her subsequent marks the beginning of the falling action leading to the resolution of the play, which is the arrival of Friar Lawrence and the revealing of the moral lesson - the destructive power of hate.

The character of the Nurse greatly contrasts with Juliet, providing levity but also foreshadowing the eventual tragedy. Performances of Shakespeare's plays, including Romeo and Juliet, can be adapted for various formats, such as matinee school performances or cultural reinterpretations like the Filipino production, illustrating that while the central story remains, presentation styles can vary widely.

Homo erectus is a species of archaic humans that lived throughout most of the Pleistocene geological epoch :)

Final answer:

The inference from 'Did Franklin Really Collect Electric Fire from the Sky?' pertains to Benjamin Franklin's experiment demonstrating the connection between lightning and static electricity, hinting at how he saw unity in the laws of nature through electricity.

Explanation:

From the statement, "Did Franklin Really Collect Electric Fire from the Sky?" one can infer that it references Benjamin Franklin's famous experiment where he flew a kite during a thunderstorm to demonstrate the connection between lightning and static electricity. Benjamin Franklin was not only an influential politician and scientist but also played a pivotal role in the understanding of electricity. His experiment involved drawing sparks from a key tied to the kite string, which were similar to the sparks from static electricity one might experience when touching a metal doorknob after walking across a wool carpet. Franklin's findings linked these everyday occurrences to the grand scale of electrical storms, showcasing the unity of natural laws.

Which of the following lines in Sonnet 29 marks a turn in the poem’s meaning?

Line 9

Answer:

line 9

Explanation:

Lines 4, 7, and 8 continue and/or develop the ideas of their respective preceding lines.

Only line 9 marks a turn in the poem’s meaning.

Answer:

Hello there! On both cartoons violates the liberty to vote stated on article 21 and partly on article 22.

Explanation:

The first cartoon titled "Woman's Suffrage before 1920"  we can see that the majority of states allowed women to vote, but at that year the country was not still equal applying equality on all states.

The second cartoon shows an irregularity on voting when the guy on the left says that "they used his confession against himself" inferring that the government buys votes and sometimes bribes citizens.

Article 21 states that "Everyone has the right to take part in  government and freely chose their representatives" and article 22 states that "as a member of society has the right of social security and its entitled realization and satisfaction to develop freely his/her personality".

These two cartoons violate the liberty to vote, giving the government and/or public organizations the control to take away the citizen's liberty to choose their representatives.

An unreliable narrator is a narrator whose credibility has been seriously compromised.

someone who says something that you can not rely on

Answer:

C. The Bill of Rights list the rights all U.S. citizens possess, including the rights to free speech and due process.

Explanation:

Bill of Rights involves the first ten amendments to the constitution of the United States that offers a formal declaration and guarantee of the civil rights and liberties like freedom of speech, assembly, press, and religion. It also displays the limitations of federal and state governments which broadens the concept of equality among the American people. Thus, we may conclude with option C as it best summarizes the purpose(objective) and content of the Bill of Rights.

The objective summary will be C. The Bill of Rights list the rights all U.S. citizens possess, including the rights to free speech and due process.

Bill of Rights involves the first ten amendments to the constitution of the United States that offers a formal declaration and guarantee of the civil rights and liberties like freedom of speech, assembly, press, and religion.

It also displays the limitations of federal and state governments which broadens the concept of equality among the American people. Thus, we may conclude with option C as it best summarizes the purpose(objective) and content of the Bill of Rights.

The correct option is C

Learn more about objective summary

https://brainly.com/question/25046487

#SPJ6

1. C. The work was difficult, yet Lucy was glad to have a job.

2. C. Folks were struggling to survive in most places, but in California they had jobs.

3. B. Dos Palos was a small community, but the land was good for farming.

I'm fairly certain of all these answers!

Hope this helps :)

C. How sharks sense food.

In other words, everything in the passage is showing their survival abilities for seeking prey.

Sharks have highly specialized senses, including smell, vibration detection through the lateral line, and electroreception via ampullae of Lorenzini, which aid them in hunting prey.

The main idea of the statement is that sharks have evolved highly specialized senses to locate and hunt their prey. Sharks possess a keen sense of smell which allows them to smell blood from far away, as well as a system of channels in their skin, known as the lateral line, to detect the vibrations of a swimmer. Additionally, sharks have electroreceptors called ampullae of Lorenzini that enable them to sense electromagnetic fields emitted by living creatures. While sharks can only see clearly up to about 50 feet, their other senses more than compensate for this when hunting. When spotting a shark, it is recommended to swim away smoothly to avoid provoking it.

A grotto is a cave or an artificial hollowing.  As you read, which of these words would mean the same as cave or hollowing.  Not air.  Pure and atmosphere would be describing or similar to (a synonym for) air.  Mephitic means foul smelling, so that is the antonym of air or pure.  The best choices are cavern and opening, especially since it says, "forming an opening".

The cultural context of literature encompasses the social and historical background critical for understanding a text's significance, including various factors like the time period, societal norms, and political circumstances of its creation.

The cultural context of a piece of literature refers to the social background that is used to understand the text. This context includes the historical, literary, cultural, socioeconomic, religious, and political background within which the text was written, and is crucial for fully grasping its significance. It's not about the genre, which is the formal category of the text, nor the author's family background, nor exclusively about the family structure of the characters, although these elements might play a role within the broader cultural context.

To analyze a text's cultural context, we should consider what circumstances produced it. Questions such as the historical, social, and political conditions during the time of its creation are vital to this analysis. This helps us understand why characters make the choices they do, and why the author presented them in a particular manner.

For instance, analyzing the social context of Gwendolyn Brooks's poem "We Real Cool" might involve examining society's view of the characters as misfits and how this reflects broader issues like systemic racism and the challenges that Black individuals may face.

https://brainly.com/question/8280542

#SPJ2

I would say B but if I'm wrong it's D.

Hope This Helps!    Have A Nice Weekend!!

I think the answer is B.

1. There

2. Their

3. Made their teeth chatter

4. There

5. They're

6. Their

7. They're

8. Their

9. There

10. Their

Hope this helps x

Please mark brainliest <3

There seem to be no instructions, therefore you just have to read it.

Many scientists believe in Evolution as the common answer to the origin of life. A huge percentage of scientists claim that Evolution is a fact. However, fail to put in doubt this widespread theory and fail to achieve to find proff about the credibility of this theory. How can one know that evolution is not a fact but instead a mere theory or even a myth? The many theories evolution has itself is very complex and oftentimes incomprehensible; it does not bring peace and sastisfactory answers to an individual looking for a purpose in life but instead leaves the person with doubt and many questions which seem to have no answer. The theory of evolution is an idea which can easily be debunked by any person with wits who knows that such a theory has many controversies and that in the end can lead to no final conclusions.

Evolution is no scientific fact but instead a philosophy. However, people believe it’s a fact because of fossil remains that seem similar to modern animals. For example: In the book (Science: Preparation for the Test) states: “Scientists compare animals living today with the fossilized remains of animals that no longer exist. By doing so, they can obtain [supporting ideas] of common ancestry.” And an example of ancestry observed by scientists is found on in the same book mentioned, where it says: “Scientists have found fossilized remains of a series of animals that are relatives of today’s whales...Pakicetus... the skull represents [similarity] between the ear of a land animal and an aquatic animal”. Now, such claims are pointless and overbearing. If we look at both creatures the pakicetus has no registered fossils of evolutionary signs which can give any proven fact of its evolutionary trip from land to the sea. The book entitled: “Life... How did it come to be” has logical insight to the imperfections found in the theory of Evolution. The book mentioned states: “Why are registered fossils so important in Evolution? Gene expert G.L Stebbins said: “No biologist has seen in reality the origin of evolution. None of the great organisms has made an evolutionary change.” Today, we see no organisms who evolve through evolution.” Even Charles Darwin admitted: “The distinctions characterized in specific forms of life and the fact that they are not connected between themselves... is very obvious “. Using common logic Evolution cannot be a direct fact. But, instead it must remain only as a mere theory and in the future a possible myth.

Almost all scientists which claim to follow Darwin’s evolutionary theories have failed to provide proff of its existence and left results to experiments inconclusive. The Magazine entitled: “The origin of life” states: “Biology professor Alexandre Meinesz said in 2008 that during the past 50 years “No proff has sustained the hypothesis of a spontaneous arrival of life on Earth by means of a molecular soup and no scientific knowledge pointed towards this direction”. There is a basic law in science and that is that life cannot emerge on its own, life always comes from a pre-existing life source. However, Evolution claims that life has come from material that was unresponsive and non-existent. How can such a thing even be possible if the basic law of science is that life produces life? The magazine “The origin of life” also states: “Life comes from life. Believing that a simple live cell came to be by a casualty using [un-living] material is an act of faith”.

Evolution can be considered a hypothesis and a theory but in no way can it be considered a straight up fact, no matter how logical or convincing most scientists make it seem. It is simply not a proven fact. Nature, animals, the performance of the human body, etc is absolutely perfect. That is why that something that seems perfect in every sense possible cannot be a work of casualties. The work “Evolution or Creation” states: “Evolution is an act of faith”. Just like religion is an act of faith believing that raw materials can turn to living things is also an act of faith. Unless Evolution had photographic and physical proff of its existence there is no possible way that it can be a teachable fact.

Whenever we want to practice or belief a certain idea, thought, etc. We must first consider who founded the belief or idea and why they founded it. We must later confirm for ourselves if it’s the truth and if not discard of it immediately. Charles Darwin is considered the first to have hypothesized a theory which contradicted all the religious beliefs of there ever being a Creator. Such a critical hypothesis came to him after the death of his beloved daughter. Looking for some religious consolation Darwin was left upset and frustrated by the religious clergy of his time who affirmed that God needed another angel in heaven; by saying this they directly affirmed that God was the direct cause of his child’s death...

Hope this helps, call out for me if you need anything else sweetie :D