to end vote recounts
Answer:
In Bush v. Gore, George W. Bush asked the U.S. Supreme Court to end the votes' recount.
Explanation:
The Bush vs. Gore case was handled by the United States Supreme Court on 11 December 2000 and determined the outcome of the 2000 US presidential election. In three separate trial sessions, the judges decided with a majority of 7 to 2 that the recount of the cards that was taking place in some Florida counties had to be suspended due to a lack of coherent bases. In a further trial session it was established with a 5 to 4 majority that there was not enough time to establish the basis for a new recount that could have met the electoral terms in the State of Florida.
The court's decision stopped the recount of the votes and allowed Florida secretary of state Katherine Harris to validate George W. Bush's electoral victory in that state. The 25 votes of the great electors in Florida gave the Republican candidate the victory in the presidential elections.
The presidential elections took place on November 7, 2000. According to the US electoral system, each state conducts its own consultations for the choice of president and each candidate receives a different number of votes depending on the state in which he wins. Whoever obtains the majority of votes at the federal level is elected president of the United States of America. In 2000 the number of votes needed for the victory was 270.
On November 8, 2000, the electoral division report in Florida stated that Bush had a margin of victory of 1784 votes, equivalent to 0.5% difference. According to the Florida Statute, such a situation required an automatic recount of the votes. This process resulted in a restriction of the margin of victory for Bush and on 10 November, after the recount had ended in all the counties except one, this margin had been thinned until it reached 327 votes.
Florida electoral laws allow a candidate to request a manual recount of votes cast in a county, which Gore did for 4 cases in Florida: Volusia, Palm Beach, Broward and Miami-Dade, which consented to the procedure. However, according to these laws, all the counties had to declare their results to the Florida secretary of state within seven days of the elections, and many of the counties that carried out the manual recount did not believe they could meet this deadline. On November 14, the day the deadline expired, the Florida court declared that this deadline was mandatory, but that the counties could amend their results at a later date.
The dispute in the Bush vs. case Gore was brought before the court on December 11 by lawyers on both sides: for Bush by attorney Theodore B. Olson, from the District of Columbia and for Gore by David Boies. Given the importance of the case, the Supreme Court expressed its verdict only 16 hours after the hearings and the fate of the case was closely linked to the fate of the "Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board" case.
Which political party advocated states’ rights over federal authority? A. Republican Party B. Democratic-Republican Party C. Democratic Party D. Federalist Party
What does Gandhi think of the Caste System?
Mahatma Gandhi viewed the caste system as an oppressive social hierarchy that undermined unity and equality in India. He worked towards its eradication, seeking to replace it with a sense of brotherhood among all Indians.
Mahatma Gandhi's views on the caste system are indicative of his broader pursuit for social reform and equality. Gandhi recognized the caste system as a form of social tyranny, an oppressive hierarchy that enforced discrimination and was contrary to the spirit of self-sufficiency he championed for India. He aspired for an India where the vestiges of caste would be eradicated and all individuals would live with a sense of brotherhood, irrespective of their background. Believing that the caste system deprived the poorest Indians of hope and substantially contributed to social division, Gandhi sought to foster unity and dismantle the structure of oppression that the system facilitated. He understood that the system had become deeply entrenched in the Hindu way of life, but nevertheless saw it as contradicting the very essence of freedom and progress needed in modern society.
which option is one important source of public opinion personal background, survey's, the constitution, foreign policy
Hi!
The option that is considered to be one important source of public opinion is: B) Surveys.
Explanation:
Surveys are a method that consists on gathering information from individuals. This information is collected through use of standardized procedures so that each participant is asked to answer the same questions. So, this is a source of gathering public opinions.
Answer:
surveys
Explanation:
I know because the main sources of public opinion is: interest groups, personal background, and mass media!
Also the correct definition of opinion polls is: surveys that ask people questions about specific topics, issues, or individuals!
And surveys is a type of mass media so it all makes sense! :>
Which of the following best explains why Chinese immigrants moved to the United States in the 1800s? Chinese immigrants wanted to start their own railroads. Chinese immigrants wanted to send money to their families. Chinese immigrants wanted to escape religious persecution. Chinese immigrants wanted to settle in East Coast cities.
To send money to their families. Chinese large-scale migration to the U.S. began with the First Opium War, a war started by Great Britain against the Chinese Empire in 1839 that lasted until 1842, in wich Britain forced China to recognize them as equals and grant them many unprecendented trade rights. Large-scale chinese migration to america was carachterized by young men who had left their families back home, chinese society was marked by many social nets such as guilds and sometimes they would finance the immigration, some villages and even whole regions arranged for most of their young men to immigrate to America in order to send back money.
Answer:
sned money home to their families on edge
Explanation:
What were the main benefits of United States that led to annex Texas
Mexico wanted to keep Texas, and Van Buren feared it would cause war. He also didn't want to add a new state to the Union that allowed slavery. People who wanted to annex Texas said it was the manifest destiny of the United States to spread from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. In 1845, James Polk became President.
How did the Supreme Court support civil rights during the 1970’s?
Oh I actually did a paper on this! The Supreme Court's main contribution to supporting the civil rights movement was the acts they passed in that area. Although the 60's had more to do with the rights of everyone in general, the 70's focused more on the education system. The busing act was extremely important because it allowed counties to change county guidelines to promote racial integration in public schools. The high school I graduated from was actually the first in my state and that's what I researched! This case is known as Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 (1971) if you want more information. Gates v. Collier also ended legal racial segregation in prisons! Griggs v. Duke made it illegal to use intelligence tests as a requirement for African-Americans to get positions and Lau v. Nicolas made it unconstitutional for schools not to provide English translations to Chinese-speaking students.
HELP NOT MUCH TIME! ASAAPPPPPP
Case Study: General Andrew Jackson: Andrew Jackson's military career spanned several wars including the American Revolution, the Creek War, the War of 1812, and the First Seminole War. After the Creek War, Jackson and the Creek Indians signed the Treaty of Fort Jackson in which the Creeks ceded lands in Georgia and Alabama to the U.S. During the War of 1812, Jackson drove the British out of New Orleans and Florida, thereby proving the strength of the newly formed United States. After the Creek Indians ceded their lands in Georgia and Alabama, many of their leaders, known as the Red Sticks, fled to Florida. In 1818, Andrew Jackson invaded Florida in search of the Red Sticks. In 1819, the Spanish ceded Florida to the U.S.
Using the map, what can you infer about how these two events were related?
A. Jackson's attacks showed how weak Spain was in Florida.
B. The invasion allowed the U.S. to create a treaty with France.
C. Jackson's attacks proved that the Native Americans could not be trusted.
D. The invasion of Florida allowed Jackson a chance to explore new territory.
A. Jackson's attacks showed how weak Spain was in Florida is the correct alternative.
In 1818, Andrew Jackson's hunt for the Red Sticks ended up causing international affairs and diplomacy problems. This happened because the invaded land was Spain's territory and got invaded without any official cause or declarations of war.
Despite the controversy the invasion actually ended up turning Andrew Jackson into a hero and forced the signature of the Adams-Onís Treaty, in 1919. The treaty officially transferred the Florida region to the U.S. from Spanish domain. These events were important for this resolution because even though Spain was angered with the 1818 invasion, it showed their inability to retaliate or conquer back the land. Therefore, the only viable option was for the Spanish to sign the treaty and cede Florida, showing how fragile and unable to the defend the land by the Spanish, relinquishing their last piece of land in the Americas.
Answer: Jackson's attacks showed how weak Spain was in Florida.
which statement describes the majority party’s power when it comes to senate committees
All sixteen chairpersons are members of the majority party.
Answer:The chair of each committee and a majority of its members represent the majority party, with the chair setting the agenda for committee business. Each party assigns its own members to committees, and each committee distributes its members among its subcommittees. The Senate places limits on the number and types of panels any one senator may serve on or chair.
Each committee hires its own staff, and levels of operating funds varies from committee to committee. The majority party controls most committee staff and resources, but a portion (consistent with party division) is shared with the minority.
One way ming dynasty was able to cause the empire to experience tremendous economic growth was to..
A) make an alliance with the yuan dynasty
B) use the navy to establish colonies throughout the pacific
C) create a system of roads connecting China with the Middle East
D) institute land reform and relax trade restrictions with Europeans
D) institute land reform and relax trade restrictions with Europeans.
The correct answer is D) institute land reform and relax trade restrictions with Europeans
The Ming Dynasty replaced the Yuan dynasty in China in 1368. It was different than other Dynasties because it earned a lot of money from trading goods to the Europeans - they traded goods like spices, teas, and porcelain -. It ruled the Indian Ocean trade and because of it the explorer Zheng traveled to East Africa. When the emperor Yongle died China isolated itself again.
how did the prohibition and republican party platforms differ on the temperance issue
Temperance--voluntary abstinence from alcohol--was popular in the 1890s, and widely promoted by the largest women's organization of the Gilded Age, the Woman's Christian Temperance Union (WCTU). Prohibition--national, state, or local laws preventing the sale of alcohol--was more controversial. A minority faction of Republicans supported national prohibition, as did some Populists (mostly in the West rather than the South). Since 1869 the strongest supporters of anti-liquor had banded together in the Prohibition Party.
Which event set a precedent for the rights of free speech and freedom of the press in the colonies?
A. the publication of Poor Richard’s Almanac
B. the Salem witch trials
C. the Zenger libel trial
D. the introduction of public libraries
E. the establishment of the Frame of Government
if im correct it is C. the zenger libel trial.
The correct answer is C) the Zenger libel trial.
The event that set a precedent for the rights of free speech and freedom of the press in the colonies was the Zenger libel trial.
The trial of John Peter Zenger set a precedent for free speech. Zenger was a printer in New York. Coming from Germany, Zenger printed the "New York Weekly Journal," where it exposed the negative conduct and corrupt acts of governor William S. Cosby. The authors of the information were anonymous and Zenger went to prison in 1733 and was accused of attacking the government. A lawyer from Philadelphia named Andrew Hamilton defended him and made and the jury declared him not guilty.
Why were the teachings of ST. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas were important to people in the middle ages
The texts written by these two authors are really relevant to people in the middle age, since these theologists gave people of that age new tools in order to understand and interpret the Scriptures. As faith was truly important in the middle age, having a reliable way to know, learn and understand what was written in those passages, it was essential. Therefore, the teachings of ST. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas were helpful and useful for faithful followers who wanted to have a closer connection with Jesus, and in that time, it became necessary to have some sources of knowledge which could allow to approach to what they wanted and needed to know regarding the Holy Scriptures.
Why didn’t Egyptians never use humor when drawing humans
"Queen Nefertiti was a beautiful black Egyptian queen," wrote an outraged reader, Joan P. Wilson, in a letter to the magazine. "The Egyptians are a black race of people. This doll has creamy white skin color
What were the British instructed to do with the tea
They staged the protest by boarding three trade ships in Boston Harbor and throwing the ships' cargo of tea overboard into the ocean. They threw 342 chests of tea into the water.
Answer:
They were instructed to open up the hatches,take out all the chests of tea and throw them overboard.
What effect did John brown raid and execution have in the north
John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry and his execution injected further tensions between the North and South. It stirred fears in the southern states, pushing them closer to secession, and inspired many Northern abolitionists, though not all agreed with his violent methods. This heightened sectional tensions and contributed to the onset of the Civil War.
Explanation:John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry and his subsequent execution had significant effects in the North. Many abolitionists saw Brown as a martyr for the antislavery cause. His bold, violent actions against the institution of slavery further exacerbated tensions between the North and the South, ultimately contributing to the onset of the American Civil War.
Brown's intensity of purpose and his willing to pursue violent means to end slavery were seen by some northerners as valiant. However, not all Northern abolitionists supported Brown or his methods. People like William Lloyd Garrison, a pacifist abolitionist, preferred a non-violent approach. Regardless, the impact of Brown's actions was immense - it intensified the discourse about slavery and provoked greater urgency and tension in the ongoing debates.
Brown's raid also stirred significant fear in the South, as it seemed to confirm their worries about a Northern majority willing to overthrow the institution of slavery by any means necessary. This fear set the stage for increased sectional differences, leading to the secession of several Southern states and eventually the Civil War.
Learn more about John Brown's Raid here:https://brainly.com/question/30093485
#SPJ3
Slave state legislators had more power and what part of Congress during the 1850s
The answer is:
In both the House of Representatives and the Senate is where Slave State Legislators had more power during the 1850s.
Explanation:
African Americans primarily favored the Republican Party in the 1850's due to its more tangible efforts in achieving the abolition of slavery. The South had long favored the state's right to legal slavery and was also a Democratic stronghold.
In The Senate, it wasn't until the Compromise of 1850 that California was admitted as a free state, however California agreed to send one pro-slavery and one anti-slavery senator to Congress in order to avoid creating a free state majority in the Senate and keep things even.
Slave State legislatures had more power in THE SENATE during the 1850s.
The nation consisted of a loose alliance of independent states which was called the league of
The nation consisted of a loose alliance (union) of the independent states, which was called the League of Friendship
The phrase refers to the Articles of Confederation, which was the first constitution of the United States, created a 'firm league of friendship' among the 13 original states, maintaining them as sovereign and independent. However, it was replaced by the current U.S. Constitution in 1789.
Explanation:This phrase is most likely referring to the Articles of Confederation. The Articles were adopted by the United States as its first constitution during the Revolutionary War. These Articles established a 'firm league of friendship' among the 13 original states, which remained sovereign and independent. It created a loose alliance of independent states, with a very weak central government. However, it was replaced by the U.S. Constitution in 1789 due to its weaknesses, which included the inability to levy taxes, regulate trade, or enforce laws.
Learn more about Articles of Confederation here:https://brainly.com/question/18377156
#SPJ6
• president of the Confederate States of America • U.S. senator from Mississippi prior to the state's secession • appointed Robert E. Lee as leader of the Confederate Army Who is described in the box above?
Jefferson Davis was elected Confederate president.
Explain how WW2 was more deadly than any war in history? Which country suffered the most?
By the numbers, the WWII was indeed the most deadly war in history as it killed an estimate of 60 to 75 million people. It was the first war that really took multi-continental proportions and affected every country and group of people in the world. It involved around 100 million people and it was marked by mass killings of civilians, like the Holocaust, and atomic bombings. The Soviet Union was the country that suffered the most casualities, civilian and military, losing roughly 15% of its population.
What does this map show about the importance of the West Coast of North America?
A. Its resources, such as lumber, were valuable to the Asian market, unlike New York City.
B. It was far from Asia and required a route through Central America.
C. Its ports were more convenient for trade with Asia than those on the East Coast.
D. It was too far from New York City to be useful for trade
Answer:
The answer is actually C, I have the same quiz and another source provided that the answer is in fact, C
The map about the importance of the West Coast of North America shows that, "Its ports were more convenient for trade with Asia than those on the East Coast."
Where is the West Coast of North America?The west coast of North America is a region of a continent bordering the Pacific Ocean which includes parts of the U.S. The West Coast is the most populated coastal area in the United States.
The map about the importance of the West Coast of North America shows that the ports in West coast were more convenient for trade with Asia than those on the East Coast.
What was the importance of the West Coast of North America?The West Coast of North America had one big advantage of being the gateway to international trade. The West coast became important in North America which built relations with international countries through trade.
California and Washington both have major ports for trade between the U.S. and Asia that support the exchange of goods. This trade is dominated by American agricultural products and Asian manufactured products. Thus, these ports have become increasingly integral to the world economy.
Hence, option C is correct.
To learn more about West Coast of North America here:
https://brainly.com/question/15686050
#SPJ2
Main purpose of the emancipation Proclamation
The Emancipation Proclamation granted freedom to the slaves in the Confederate States if the States did not return to the Union by January 1, 1863. In addition, under this proclamation, freedom would only come to the slaves if the Union won the war. By the President of the United States of America: A Proclamation.
In what year was the importation of slaves banned in the United States?
I believe the answer is "1807"
Answer:1807
Explanation:This when the importation of slaves was banned
What was the purpose of the first Earth Day event on April 22, 1970?
A. to celebrate spring
B. to plant trees and flowers
C. to protest environmental problems
D. to raise money for the Superfund
C) To protest environmental problems.
Answer:
C) To protest environmental problems. hope this helps :)
Explanation:
How did ancient cultures lay the foundation of many modern ideas?
As an example of an ancient culture laying a foundation for a modern idea, you can take an Ancient Greece and their idea of democracy. Athenians founded ekklesia, where an adult male could participate. They held meetings where they used the voting system to make decisions.
The phrase "For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world" would MOST likely reference a law passed because of which event?
The phrase is likely a reference to the Navigation Acts enacted by the British government, which led to the American Revolutionary War by restricting the colonies' trade and consequently damaging the American economy.
Explanation:The phrase "For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world" most likely references a law or action that led to the American Revolutionary War. This phrase, culled from the Declaration of Independence, was an indictment of King George III. The American colonies were upset about various policies enacted by the British government, one of which, the Navigation Acts, restricted trade by requiring that all goods to and from the colonies had to be transported on British vessels. Essentially, the King was accused of harming the American economy and preventing the colonies from trading with other parts of the world.
Learn more about American Revolutionary War here:https://brainly.com/question/2157569
#SPJ3
HELP ASAP! BRAINLIEST!!
Use the passage to answer the following question:
"I can see no reason to doubt but the imposition of taxes, whether on trade, or on land, or houses, or ships, on real or personal, fixed ort floating property, in the colonies is absolutely irreconcilable with the rights of the colonists as British subjects and as men. I say men, for in a state of nature no man can take my property from me without my consent: if he does, he deprives me of my liberty and makes me a slave."
—James Otis, 1763
Who is the main audience Otis is writing to in this excerpt?
The members of the Constitutional Convention
Those colonists already joined in the fight for freedom
Those colonists who might still feel loyal to the crown
The British aristocracy charged with governing the colonies
The colonist who were still loyal to Britain.
Otis was not even addressing a "fight" for freedom, since the fight had not begun yet in 1763. He was arguing that the colonists were British citizens and must have a voice in Parliament when colonial affairs (such as taxes) were considered, and the taxes imposed. Think about what was going on in 1763 with the imposition of taxes to pay for the French and Indian (and European) wars. Who imposed those taxes without the consent of the colonists? Who would Otis protest to?
The main audience Otis is writing to in this excerpt are those colonists who might still feel loyal to the crown.
Otis argued that the colonists are British citizens and must have their place in Parliament regarding colonial affairs. He explains that the colonist are also human, and they also have the same rights as English men in England.Continuous imposing taxes and laws represent that colonies are not seen as equal as British.He further says that colonists have no right to fight for their things as their liberty are taken away.Therefore we can conclude that James Otis wants those people who are loyal to the crown to understand the issues.
Thus option C. is the correct answer.
Learn more about James Otis here:
brainly.com/question/7947556
Which option most accurately compares the economic systems of the Massachusetts and Virginia colonies
The economy of Virginia was mainly based on tobacco.The plantation owners had to buy slaves to work in the fields,so the slave industry in Virginia was an enormous factor.The plantation owners were very rich,elite category and pretty much ran the politics.Virginia had a very small middle class and they had barely had any say in elections.The poor consisted of 80% of population and were not allowed to vote.One drought and Virginia economy will struggle.
2...Massachusetts economy was much more stable because it did not only rely on one form of income.There were many harbours in Massachusetts and so professions included blacksmiths,clothing makers,merchants and sailors.There was also a much more cash flow in Massachusetts because of much larger middle class who won't flaunt their wealth as they were Puritans who believed showing off wealth was temptation and it was sin.
Whats was the goal of pacifists during word war 1?
Pre-WW1 pacifism was the belief that violence was always immoral, even if someone is trying to kill you. The belief might have been grounded in religious commitment against the killing of human beings or in a secular belief that war could never replace peaceful negotiations as a means of solving disputes.
What happened at Sand Creek in eastern Colorado in 1864? A. An American military officer discovered gold on the land granted to a group of Cheyenne families and forcibly moved the families to another area.
B. A band of Cheyenne who had refused to sign treaties attacked settlers at the town of Sand Creek, killing men, women, and children.
C. A band of friendly Cheyenne men, women and children, who were under government protection, were massacred by an American military officer and 700 volunteers.
D. A band of Cheyenne, who had agreed to government regulations, slaughtered an American military officer and 700 soldiers.
C. A band of friendly Cheyenne men, women and children, who were under government protection, were massacred by an American military officer and 700 volunteers.
At Sand Creek in eastern Colorado in 1864 a band of friendly Cheyenne men, women, and children, who were under government protection, were massacred by an American military officer and 700 volunteers. The correct option is c.
On November 29, 1864, the Sand Creek Massacre in eastern Colorado took place. It involved a militia unit from the Colorado Territory led by Colonel John Chivington attacking a peaceful Cheyenne and Arapaho camp. The Native Americans thought they were protected by the government when they were attacked. But the massacre resulted in the deaths of 150–200 Native Americans, primarily women, children and elderly people.
This tragic incident highlights a dark chapter in American history the treatment of Native American tribes during the westward expansion by highlighting mistreatment and violence. The Sand Creek Massacre serves as a potent reminder of the wrongs done to native Americans in the United States.
learn more about Sand Creek Massacre here
brainly.com/question/9674406
#SPJ6
In what way was the Haitian rebellion like the American Revolutionary War?
A. Both conflicts began as slave revolts
B. Both conflicts involved fighting against the French
C. Both conflicts were mostly about control of scarce resources
D. Both conflicts saw North American colonies break away from European states
Answer:
its b.
Explanation:
sorry if I'm wrong but I believe this is the answer