Answer:
Hamilton argued that the constitution was not and should not be a document protecting the rights of individuals. Hamilton claims that if the bill of rights is included, the constitution could be misinterpreted as the only rights that individuals posed. Hamilton also suggests that a bill of rights would give the government more power and not less, after all, why forbid the government from undertaking a certain action unless that government has the power to do so? This sentiment is expressed in the following excerpt, were Hamilton lays out some of the dangerous he believes may arise from the inclusion of a bill of rights in the constitution: "They (The Bill of Rights) would contain various exceptions to powers which are not granted; and on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do? Why for instance, should it be said, that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed?". Hamilton also argues that the entire constitution is itself a bill of rights, and so the addition of a bill of rights is unnecessary, as seen here; "... the constitution is itself in every rational sense, and to every useful purpose, A BILL OF RIGHTS. The several bills of rights, in Great-Britain, form its constitution, and conversely, the constitution of each state is its bill of rights. And the proposed constitution, if adopted, will be the bill of rights of the union." The author of Brutus II disagrees with Hamilton, believing that the foundation of the United States should protect and guarantee the rights of its citizens. The author believed that enshrining civil rights in the constitution was vital for the success of the nation. Considering historical context, including the outcome of the debate, the argument presented in Brutus II appears stronger, as it garnered more supported and made its way into the constitution, most definitely impacting the course of US history and the lives of US citizens today.
Plz help me put these events in order chronologically
Answer: 1.) Buddhism, Hinduism, then Christianity. 2.) Era of Warring States, Qin Dynasty, then Han Dynasty. 3.) Greek City-States, Roman Republic, then Roman Empire.
Explanation:
___ what is the Aztec emperor. what did the Spanish do with him
Answer:
Montezuma II was the Aztec emperor. Hernan Cortez and his men were under a siege in a safe(where the city's gold was kept). They trapped Montezuma in there with them.
Which two events happened as a result of the US invasion of Irak?
Saddam and Hassan were executed. This also led to the political instability in Iraq.
Explanation:
The United States of America invaded Iraq in the year 2003. The administration in the United States were told by the president Bush that they were going to invade Iraq.
With this invasion, there was a lot of instability in Iraq in political and economic terms. In the invasion, Saddam and Hassan were also executed. This had even more adverse effects on the country.
During World War II in Europe, American troops played a significant role in which of the following?
Answer:
You have not given any options but let me answer with the most suitable options!
I guess the closest answer is The Normandy Invasions and the D-Day. it was the largest amphibious attack in the human history and the beginning of the decline of the Nazi regime in the mainland Europe and the France.
Moreover, in terms of financial assistance, since the 1941, USA had been supplying the allies with ammunition and all the required war material under the "Lend-Lease Policy".
Hope this helps!
Explanation:
Answer:
D Day invasion
Explanation:
Why did the British promise some of their colonies independence during World War II?
The British felt sorry for their colonies.
The British believed it was wrong to have colonies.
The British wanted colonial troops to help in the fighting.
O The British wanted to follow the example that had been set by Germany.
Answer:
C.) The British wanted colonial troops to help in the fighting
Explanation:
Troops from the British Empire fought in every theatre of war through the years of World War Two - as they had fought in a range of conflicts, on the side of Britain, for the past 150 years or so. There were over two and a half million Indian citizens in uniform during the war.
The British promised independence after WW2 because they wanted colonial troops to help in the fighting.
What was the second world war?This was the war that took place between the axis powers and the allied powers.
The reason for the war was because the allied forces wanted to stop the aggression of the axis powers.
Read more on ww2 here:
https://brainly.com/question/651584
#SPJ5
explain the growth of big businesses and the labor movement
Answer:
The labor movement in the United States grew out of the need to protect the common interest of workers. For those in the industrial sector, organized labor unions fought for better wages, reasonable hours and safer working conditions.
How did samurai believe they should act towards their Lord
The biggest goal of the samurai was to defend the master!
Explanation:
The samurai were obliged to comply with the Bushido code, but of course how many samurai actually adhered to that code varied considerably. Bushido came under the strong influence of the philosophy of Confucianism, and promoted loyalty to his superiors, self-discipline, self-respect, and moral conduct. Death is not the worst for a samurai. The scariest thing is to stay out of honor. And even then an honorable death should be chosen.Learn more on samurai on
https://brainly.com/question/2998922
https://brainly.com/question/902069
https://brainly.com/question/361705
#learnwithBrainly
how were louis xiv and james ii similar and different
Answer: Louis XIV and James II aspired to an absolutist system of government.
Explanation:
Similarities: Both rulers advocated absolutism as a system of government. We can define the state in absolutism as a monarchy. It is a system of government created by breaking the links between the Middle Ages and the New Age. The rulers, as proponents of these ideas, sought to put all the institutions of the state under their control. The most obvious example of an absolutist monarchy in Europe is France.
Differences : Unlike the French ruler Louis XIV, who fully implemented his absolutist values, this was not the case with James II. James II in his quest to make England an absolutist monarchy did not find popular support. James II's intentions were contrary to the views of the English Parliament. In the end, coming into conflict with Parliament and even the church (absolutism implied the subjugation of the church), James II would ultimately lose this battle. On the other hand, Louis XIV did not have these problems and until his death, he enjoyed the absolutist model of government.
Why is Petrarch considered to be a humanist?
He wrote of the pursuit of wealth, power, and prestige.
His work supports the idea that love is attained in the next world.
His love poetry conveys the strength of spiritual feelings.
His sonnets focused on worldly interests of romance and nature.
Answer:
His love poetry conveys the strength of spiritual feelings.
Explanation:
Answer: his sonnets focused on worldly interests of romance and nature.
Explanation: human nature, worldly love (love to a woman, Laura), idealization and romanticization of a real woman that is something which cannot be viewed as a typicaly medieval art. Petrarch is an example of humanist artist (14th-century Italy).
5. Complete the chart by summarizing and explaining the effects of four cases in
which the Supreme Court has interpreted free speech differently (4 points)
Case name
Summary of the case and
ruling
Effects on the
interpretation of the First
Amendment
United States v. O'Brien
Tinker v. Des Moines
Schenck v. United
States
Texas V. Johnson
Four cases in which the Supreme Court interpreted free speech differently are United States v. O'Brien, Tinker v. Des Moines, Schenck v. United States, and Texas v. Johnson.
Explanation:There are several cases in which the Supreme Court has interpreted free speech differently. Here are four examples:
United States v. O'Brien: In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the burning of a draft card during the Vietnam War was not protected by the First Amendment because it was conduct that interfered with a valid government interest.Tinker v. Des Moines: The Supreme Court held that students wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War was protected symbolic speech under the First Amendment, as it did not disrupt the educational process.Schenck v. United States: The Supreme Court ruled that distributing anti-draft leaflets during World War I was not protected speech, as it created a clear and present danger to the country's war effort.Texas v. Johnson: The Supreme Court held that flag burning as a form of political protest is protected by the First Amendment, as it is a form of expressive conduct.These cases have had various effects on the interpretation of the First Amendment, shaping the limits and protections of free speech in different contexts.
Learn more about Supreme Court's interpretation of free speech here:https://brainly.com/question/16121239
#SPJ12
Which of the following describes a similarity between the kingdoms of Ghana and Malia
Answer:
Both grew wealthy by controlling access to west african gold mines.
This statement describes a similarity between the kingdoms of Ghana and Malia
Explanation:
The Ghana and the Malia were two strong and powerful kingdoms which established and extended a good as well as a mutual relationship with one another in terms of everything. They became very wealthy and emerged to be very powerful due to the growth of control accessed to the west african gold mines.
Initially, during the early ages they did not have much interest and hence did not interfere much in the trade and business sectors. They trained and raised powerful armies that were capable of increasing and extending their territories.
Match each need or want to the limited resource needed to obtain it.
Answer:
Time: Watching tv, visiting friend and family, working after school
Your money: car payment,new clothes,saving for college
Government budget: Social Security, Building schools, defenes progra
Explanation:
Briefly describe one major difference between Du Bois and Littwack’s interpretations of Reconstruction ?
Answer:
Du Bois and Litwack have a facsimile of difference in their theory of reconstruction.
Explanation:
Litwack has described the dependency and inter relations of African-Americans with poor White Americans during the emancipation proclamation and Civil war. Where as, Du Bois in his intricate and concise theory has argued about the position of black Americans during civil war, and how the picture was said to be painted of worker based/ruled democracy and came out as slavery held economy. He has also written the benefits of reconstruction affecting and influencing black Americans.
One major difference between Du Bois and Littwack’s interpretations of Reconstruction was:
- DuBois argues that African Americans gained little from Reconstruction. They fought in the Civil War to protect White Americans' economic interests, and they received little in return. African Ams desired land as a source of economic security but did not receive it.
- Litwack argues that African Americans experienced significant gains from Reconstruction, starting with their freedom. As a result, they could take control of their lives in ways that they never could before.
For further information about Du Bois and Littwack’s refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/3616858?referrer=searchResults
who is neville chamberlain
Neville Chamberlain was the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1937 to 1940 and is known for his policy of appeasement towards Nazi Germany. His approach failed and he has been criticized for his failure to adequately prepare Britain for the war.
Explanation:Neville Chamberlain was a British politician who served as the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from 1937 to 1940. He is best known for his policy of appeasement towards Nazi Germany in the lead-up to World War II.
Chamberlain believed that by making concessions to Hitler, he could avoid a war. However, this approach ultimately failed, and Chamberlain's reputation has been heavily criticized for his failure to adequately prepare Britain for the war.
Learn more about Neville Chamberlain here:https://brainly.com/question/12457329
#SPJ6
Neville Chamberlain served as the British Prime Minister from 1937 to 1940. He is best known for his appeasement policy towards Nazi Germany before World War II, particularly the Munich Agreement signed with Adolf Hitler. He resigned after facing criticism for his stance when Germany invaded Norway in 1940.
Explanation:Neville Chamberlain was a notable figure in 20th century British history. Born Arthur Neville Chamberlain on March 18, 1869, he served as the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom from May 1937 to May 1940. He is prominently known for his policy of 'appeasement' towards Nazi Germany in the period leading up to World War II.
Chamberlain believed that by satisfying the reasonable demands of Germany, he could maintain peace and prevent a war. In particular, his Munich Agreement, signed with Adolf Hitler in 1938 which ceded the Sudetenland (part of Czechoslovakia) to Germany, is seen as the epitome of the appeasement policy. However, subsequent events proved the policy to be a failure as Germany continued its aggression, leading to the start of World War II.
Following Germany's invasion of Norway in 1940, and the subsequent criticism Chamberlain faced, he resigned and was succeeded by Winston Churchill.
Learn more about Neville Chamberlain here:https://brainly.com/question/21046580
#SPJ6
Select the boxes in the table to compare and contrast Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge’s policies and actions.
Answer:
Harding - raised tariffs.
Coolidge - frugal policies.
Both - pro-business agenda, reduced world wide armament.
Explanation:
Warren Harding and Calvin Coolidge were the 29th and 30th Presidents of the United States. Both of their terms were during 1920's.
While their policies differentiated in some aspects, in other they were quite similar. For example, they were both republicans, who had a pro-business agenda.
But, living in the aftermath of World War I, Harding's main political goal was to protect american industries and agriculture to secure postwar recovery and avoid recession. Main strategy for this was to impose and raise tariffs. Coolidge continued with this policies (with keeping the tariffs high, but not raising them anymore), trying to protect american manufacturing against foreign competition. Harding's tariffs were at the record high by that time.
Also, they were both aiming to reduce world wide armament to prevent another disaster like the WWI. While Harding urged for lower defence costs during his campaign, this was not a major issue for him. He enacted an international agreement for reducing naval fleets of major powers at that time - USA, UK and Japan. On the other side, Calvin Coolidge's primary foreign policy initiative was the Kellog-Briand Pact of 1928, with the goal of renuncing war, as an instrument of national policy. Even though this Pact was never fully achieved, he managed to cut spending for the military, which leads us to his broader policies of cutting military spendings.
As oposed to Harding who was a protectionist, Calvin Coolidge believed in the minimal involvement of the state in order to produce government surplus, which is why he is known by his frugal policies.
raised tariffs - Harding
pro-business agenda - Both
reduced worldwide armaments - Harding
turned a profit in the White House through frugal policies - Coolidge
Which of the following grounds, at least in part, the exclusionary rule?
The fifth amendment protection against the deprivation of life liberty or property without due process
Explanation:
This rule is grounded in the fifth amendment in the Bill of Rights and this rule governs in protecting the people against illegal seizures and searches and this law also intends the people to protect them of being executed from the prosecutors
This is also formulated to protect the judiciary rights and it states that no person shall be deprived of life,liberty or property without the due process of law and they cannot be compelled in any criminal cases to be witness against themselves
Which of the following is an effect of the alien and section acts?
A. Foreigners were forced to leave the United States
B. The twelfth amendment was passed
C. The Federalist Party lost the election of 1800
The correct answer is letter A
Explanation: These laws made it more difficult for aliens to become citizens.
The president could deport the immigrants back to their home country
it's actually the Federalist Party lost the election of 1800
i chose the other answer and got it incorrect, it showed that this was the correct answer on the quiz instead.
Which term is most used to describe President Richard Nixon's foreign policy towant the Soviet Union
A Detente
B. Collective security
C. Brinkmanship
D. Nentrality
Answer:
The correct answer is A, "détente". Détente means relaxation or lessening in French.
Explanation:
Richard Nixon was the American president from 1969 to 1974. His foreign policy was different from previous years when ideological conflict with USSR was constant as he tried to avoid frontal conflicts with USSR and China.
He was looking for an increase in the U.S. trades with other countries and to diminish the fear of nuclear warfare.
Answer:
Detente
Explanation:
Introduction: Match each word with the phrase that best describes its meaning.
declaration
power to enforce laws
authority
a forceful statement
self-government
something that cannot be taken away
unalienable
the right to govern oneself
1) Intro
Done
The words «declaration», «power to enforce laws», «authority», «self-government» and «unalienable» match with their descriptions as a forceful statement, authority, power to enforce laws, the right to govern oneself and something that cannot be taken away respectively.
Explanation:The following words match with the corresponding phrases that describe their meanings:
Declaration: a forceful statement. Power to enforce laws: authority. Authority: power to enforce laws. Self-government: the right to govern oneself. Unalienable: something that cannot be taken away. Learn more about Vocabulary Matching here:
https://brainly.com/question/36508855
#SPJ12
A declaration is a forceful statement, authority refers to the power to enforce laws, self-government is the ability to govern oneself, and unalienable means something that cannot be taken away.
Explanation:A declaration is a forceful statement that proclaims or asserts something. It is often used to make a formal announcement or to express a strong opinion.
Authority refers to the power or right to enforce laws and make decisions. It is typically held by those in positions of leadership or government.
Self-government is the ability of a group or community to govern itself and make decisions without outside interference. It often involves the establishment of a system of laws and institutions to maintain order and provide for the welfare of the people.
The term unalienable means something that cannot be taken away or given up. In the context of self-government, it refers to the inherent right of individuals or communities to govern themselves and make their own choices.
Learn more about definitions of termshttps://brainly.com/question/14308795
#SPJ2
The Olmec civilization
A) had poor architectural skills.
B) left behind mysterious stone sculptures.
C) were the most advanced pre-Columbian civilization.
D) was not able to trade because of its geographic isolation.
Answer:
b
Explanation:b
Support or refute the assertion that the Civil War was a 2nd American Revolution. Back up your answer with evidence.
Answer:
In literature, one can see the consideration of the Civil War as the Second American Revolution, intended to solve the problem of slavery and the problem of the homesteads. Some publications rightly point out the extreme importance of these problems and the insolubility of the contradictions that divided the US North and South. Civil wars can arise not only as a class or political one, but also as a civilizational conflict in which the warring parties defend a different system of values. They can be generated by 'skillful' fanning of contrsdictions, inciting public opinion on those from whom they construct the “image of the enemy” - of course, if there are serious grounds for such a confrontation. The decisive tool in such a heated atmosphere is not evidence, but gritty phrases, stereotypes, periodic repetitions, pumping of suitable myths into the public consciousness, often misinformation and falsification of genuine facts, that is, what was often observed during the Civil War in the United States.
Explanation:
#1) According to the constitution, how many people represent each state in the senate?
#2) According to the constitution how many people represent each state in the House of Representatives?
#3) Who could vote for representatives in the lower house?
#4) who would elect the senators ?
If anyone knows the answer.. thank you :D
The U.S. Constitution determines Senate and House representation, with two senators per state and House seats based on population, elected by voters, or designated by state legislatures.
According to the U.S. Constitution:
Senate: Each state is represented by two senators, totaling 100 senators currently.House of Representatives: Representation in the House is based on state population, with a total of 435 members.Voters in each state elect members of the House of Representatives, while state legislatures initially chose senators, a process now changed by the Seventeenth Amendment of 1913.What was the immediate effect of the United States dropping the Atomic Bombs on Japan?
Japan immediately surrendered and World War II ended
The Soviet Union signed a peace treaty with the United States and the US
became the lone superpower
Germany vowed to fight to the death against the Americans and the nuclear age
began
European nations spoke out against the use of such weapons and nuclear
weapons were banned
Answer:
The correct answer is: Japan immediately surrendered and World War II ended .
Explanation:
The United States detonated two nuclear uranium bombs over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and 9 1945.
Faced with the Soviet invasion of Manchuria and the expected Soviet and American exodus on their islands, Japan decided to declare the unconditional capitulation, in order to prevent a potential third explosion. So World War II ended.
It is estimated that at least 78,000 people have died by the explosion and the shockwave.
How long have leatherback sea turtles roamed our planet?
Leatherback sea turtles have roamed our planet for 100 million years.
Explanation:
Leatherback sea turtles have a lifespan of about 50 years, these live in oceans and are world's largest turtles about 2m long in length. They also migrate huge distances. These big reptiles have been on our planet earth for a really long time of about 100 million years. These turtles are carnivores in nature i.e they feed on other sea animals like jellyfish. These have been on the planet since dinosaurs existed. For now, these turtles are critically endangered and require conservation and care.
Leatherback sea turtles have existed for around 200 million years and are some of the largest turtles, growing up to seven feet long and weighing over 2,000 pounds.
Leatherback sea turtles have roamed our planet for about 200 million years, making them ancient reptiles that predate many others such as crocodiles, lizards, and snakes. These remarkable creatures are known for their impressive size, with some leatherback turtles reaching up to seven feet in length and weighing over 2,000 pounds. As ectotherms, they lay their eggs on land and exhibit no parental care after their eggs are hatched, a common trait among turtle species.
14. What were the THREE parts of the "American System" for economic development in the first han
the nineteenth century?
A. high tariffs
B. an income tax
C. a national bank
D. heavy military spending
E. federal infrastructure subsidies
Answer:
The correct options are:
A. high tariffs
C. a national bank
E. federal infrastructure subsidies
Explanation:
The American System can be described as an important economic plan that impacted the American Policy. The American System was brought up in the first half of the 19th century.
The main points of the American System included:
1) 20%-25% tax on imported goods so that the American Industry gets promoted and no foreign competition could occur with the nation's business.
2) The establishment of a national bank so that a single currency could be used and trading might become easier.
3) The improvement of the country's infrastructure so that trade and transport becomes easier.
describe a service provided by the federal government and how the federal government impact you or your family
Which organization called for a boycott of California grapes?
Answer:
On September 8, 1965, Filipino farm workers organized as the Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee decided to strike against grape growers in Delano, California, to protest years of poor pay and working conditions.
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer choice is UFW
who were the axis powers
Answer:
Axis powers were countries Germany, Italy, Japan, Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria
Explanation:
Germany, Italy, Hungary, Romania, and Bulgaria, and Japan were axis powers
USA, France, Britain, China, and Russia were allies.
what is the location referred to as ""here"" in the quote from the divine comedy
The correct answer is Purgatorio
Explanation: "For such pride, here one pays the penalty: and I'd not be here yet, had it not been that, while I
Still could sin, I turned to Him."
What role did John Brown have in setting the stage for the Civil War
Answer:
John Brown is referred to as an abolitionist who led a group of people. He led this group against the State of Virginia. He found it important to raise this group to fight against the armed slavery. Even though he was bankrupt by the age of 42, he made it quite clear that his intention was to destroy the system of slavery. In his final days he was tried by the State of Virginia on the grounds of treason and murder. The raid is considered as a fail but it is undeniable true that the raid in fuelled the rage of the people which definitely became a root of the Civil War.
John Brown played a significant role in setting the stage for the Civil War through his radical abolitionist actions, particularly the raid on Harpers Ferry.
In 1859, John Brown, a fervent abolitionist, led a small group of followers in an attack on the federal arsenal at Harpers Ferry, Virginia (now West Virginia). His plan was to seize the weapons stored there and use them to arm a large-scale slave uprising. The raid was unsuccessful; Brown was captured by U.S. Marines led by Colonel Robert E. Lee, and he was subsequently tried, convicted, and hanged for treason against the state of Virginia, murder, and inciting a slave insurrection.
Brown's actions and his trial polarized the nation, deepening the divide between the North and the South. To many in the North, Brown was seen as a martyr who had sacrificed his life for the abolitionist cause. His actions highlighted the moral and political conflicts over slavery and contributed to the growing tension that would eventually lead to the Civil War. Conversely, in the South, Brown was viewed as a dangerous fanatic whose actions were indicative of the North's intentions to interfere with Southern institutions and incite servile insurrection.
The significance of John Brown's raid lies not only in its immediate impact but also in its contribution to the radicalization of the abolitionist movement and the hardening of positions on both sides of the slavery debate. His actions and the response to them underscored the irreconcilable differences between the free and slave states, making the Civil War increasingly inevitable.